SilverCrest Metals Inc.
SilverCrest Metals Inc. (SILV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SILV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILV | $11.55 | -0.86% | 1.7B | 19.91 | $0.58 | N/A |
| BVN | $30.73 | -6.20% | 8.3B | 9.85 | $3.30 | +3.37% |
| AUGO | $83.72 | -7.30% | 7.4B | -87.03 | -$1.01 | +2.13% |
| TFPM | $32.11 | -4.90% | 6.9B | 28.47 | $1.18 | +0.68% |
| ELVR | $94.95 | +10.09% | 6.7B | -5.32 | -$16.60 | N/A |
| ALM | $20.63 | -5.88% | 6B | -37.68 | -$0.57 | N/A |
| ARIS | $17.90 | -5.49% | 3.9B | 45.78 | $0.41 | +1.49% |
| PPTA | $27.52 | -5.56% | 3.6B | -26.36 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| GMTL | $18.98 | +2.98% | 3.4B | -102.85 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| FRGOX | $43.82 | +0.57% | 3.4B | 17.00 | $2.59 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SILV vs BVN Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while BVN trades at $30.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check BVN's competition here
SILV vs AUGO Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while AUGO trades at $83.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is -87.03. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AUGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check AUGO's competition here
SILV vs TFPM Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while TFPM trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check TFPM's competition here
SILV vs ELVR Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ELVR has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ELVR trades at $94.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ELVR's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ELVR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ELVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ELVR's competition here
SILV vs ALM Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ALM trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -37.68. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ALM's competition here
SILV vs ARIS Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ARIS trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 45.78. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ARIS's competition here
SILV vs PPTA Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while PPTA trades at $27.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -26.36. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check PPTA's competition here
SILV vs GMTL Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GMTL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while GMTL trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas GMTL's P/E ratio is -102.85. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GMTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to GMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check GMTL's competition here
SILV vs FRGOX Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FRGOX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while FRGOX trades at $43.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas FRGOX's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FRGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is more volatile compared to FRGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check FRGOX's competition here
SILV vs FSM Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FSM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while FSM trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas FSM's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FSM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to FSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check FSM's competition here
SILV vs EXK Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while EXK trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -23.17. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check EXK's competition here
SILV vs CNL Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while CNL trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -34.41. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CNL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check CNL's competition here
SILV vs SLSR Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while SLSR trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -40.77. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check SLSR's competition here
SILV vs MUX Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while MUX trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MUX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check MUX's competition here
SILV vs ELE Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ELE trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is 299.83. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ELE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ELE's competition here
SILV vs ASM Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ASM trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ASM's competition here
SILV vs GATO Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check GATO's competition here
SILV vs NEWP Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while NEWP trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -271.50. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check NEWP's competition here
SILV vs SCZM Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SCZM has a market cap of 773.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while SCZM trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas SCZM's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SCZM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to SCZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check SCZM's competition here
SILV vs MMX Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check MMX's competition here
SILV vs MAKO Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MAKO has a market cap of 697.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while MAKO trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas MAKO's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MAKO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to MAKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check MAKO's competition here
SILV vs MTA Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 641M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while MTA trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -228.67. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check MTA's competition here
SILV vs GROY Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 622.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while GROY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -177.50. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check GROY's competition here
SILV vs ITRG Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 484.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ITRG trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -286.00. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ITRG's competition here
SILV vs NSR Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check NSR's competition here
SILV vs VOXR Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while VOXR trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is 54.60. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to VOXR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check VOXR's competition here
SILV vs GROY-WT Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 284.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while GROY-WT trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is more volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check GROY-WT's competition here
SILV vs PLG Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 227.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while PLG trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -35.90. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check PLG's competition here
SILV vs NVA Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while NVA trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -20.30. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to NVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check NVA's competition here
SILV vs ATLX Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ATLX trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ATLX's competition here
SILV vs NEXM Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NEXM has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while NEXM trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas NEXM's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NEXM's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to NEXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check NEXM's competition here
SILV vs ALOY Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALOY has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ALOY trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ALOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ALOY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ALOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ALOY's competition here
SILV vs GRML Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRML has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while GRML trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas GRML's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GRML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to GRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check GRML's competition here
SILV vs GRMLW Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRMLW has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while GRMLW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas GRMLW's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GRMLW's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to GRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check GRMLW's competition here
SILV vs AUMN Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while AUMN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AUMN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check AUMN's competition here
SILV vs TRQ Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check TRQ's competition here
SILV vs HDLS Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HDLS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while HDLS trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas HDLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HDLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is more volatile compared to HDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check HDLS's competition here
SILV vs ERS Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ERS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ERS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ERS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is more volatile compared to ERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ERS's competition here
SILV vs SWC Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SWC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while SWC trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas SWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SWC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to SWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check SWC's competition here
SILV vs ATL Comparison April 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ATL trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ATL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ATL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SILV has daily volatility of 2.21 and ATL has daily volatility of N/A.Check ATL's competition here