SilverCrest Metals Inc. (SILV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SILV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILV | $11.55 | -0.86% | 1.7B | 19.91 | $0.58 | N/A |
| BVN | $33.42 | +2.01% | 8.5B | 8.11 | $4.12 | +3.36% |
| ELVR | $84.51 | +8.28% | 6.4B | -5.09 | -$16.60 | N/A |
| TFPM | $29.16 | +4.14% | 6B | 19.31 | $1.51 | +0.79% |
| AUGO | $60.89 | +7.62% | 5.1B | 57.99 | $1.05 | +3.70% |
| ALM | $17.68 | +3.57% | 5B | -36.83 | -$0.48 | N/A |
| FRGOX | $37.33 | +9.50% | 3.5B | 13.90 | $2.60 | N/A |
| ARIS | $15.89 | +5.23% | 3.3B | 18.28 | $0.87 | +1.76% |
| PPTA | $24.09 | +2.77% | 3B | -17.84 | -$1.35 | N/A |
| AYA | $18.71 | +7.04% | 2.7B | 31.18 | $0.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SILV vs BVN Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while BVN trades at $33.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check BVN's competition here
SILV vs ELVR Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ELVR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ELVR trades at $84.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ELVR's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ELVR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ELVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ELVR's competition here
SILV vs TFPM Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while TFPM trades at $29.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check TFPM's competition here
SILV vs AUGO Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while AUGO trades at $60.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is 57.99. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AUGO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check AUGO's competition here
SILV vs ALM Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ALM trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -36.83. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ALM's competition here
SILV vs FRGOX Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FRGOX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while FRGOX trades at $37.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas FRGOX's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FRGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is more volatile compared to FRGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check FRGOX's competition here
SILV vs ARIS Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ARIS trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ARIS's competition here
SILV vs PPTA Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while PPTA trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -17.84. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check PPTA's competition here
SILV vs AYA Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AYA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while AYA trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas AYA's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AYA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to AYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check AYA's competition here
SILV vs GMTL Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GMTL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while GMTL trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas GMTL's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GMTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to GMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check GMTL's competition here
SILV vs SSMR Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SSMR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while SSMR trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas SSMR's P/E ratio is -60.68. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SSMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to SSMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check SSMR's competition here
SILV vs SLSR Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while SLSR trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -49.26. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check SLSR's competition here
SILV vs MUX Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while MUX trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MUX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check MUX's competition here
SILV vs ASM Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ASM trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ASM's competition here
SILV vs GATO Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check GATO's competition here
SILV vs ELE Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 987M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ELE trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is 255.50. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ELE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ELE's competition here
SILV vs ALOY Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALOY has a market cap of 931.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ALOY trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ALOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALOY's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ALOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ALOY's competition here
SILV vs NEWP Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 839.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while NEWP trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -228.00. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check NEWP's competition here
SILV vs MMX Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check MMX's competition here
SILV vs MTA Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 684.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while MTA trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -183.25. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check MTA's competition here
SILV vs MAKO Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MAKO has a market cap of 664.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while MAKO trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas MAKO's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MAKO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to MAKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check MAKO's competition here
SILV vs SCZM Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SCZM has a market cap of 647.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while SCZM trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas SCZM's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SCZM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to SCZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check SCZM's competition here
SILV vs GROY-WT Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 584.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while GROY-WT trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check GROY-WT's competition here
SILV vs GROY Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 545.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while GROY trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -144.25. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check GROY's competition here
SILV vs NSR Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check NSR's competition here
SILV vs ITRG Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 426.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ITRG trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is 63.00. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ITRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ITRG's competition here
SILV vs REA Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, REA has a market cap of 365.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while REA trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas REA's P/E ratio is -13.70. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to REA's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to REA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check REA's competition here
SILV vs VOXR Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 287M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while VOXR trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VOXR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check VOXR's competition here
SILV vs SBMT Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SBMT has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while SBMT trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas SBMT's P/E ratio is -11.72. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SBMT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to SBMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check SBMT's competition here
SILV vs PLG Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while PLG trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check PLG's competition here
SILV vs ATLX Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ATLX trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ATLX's competition here
SILV vs NEXM Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NEXM has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while NEXM trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas NEXM's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NEXM's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to NEXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check NEXM's competition here
SILV vs LITM Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while LITM trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check LITM's competition here
SILV vs FNUC Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while FNUC trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check FNUC's competition here
SILV vs GRML Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRML has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while GRML trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas GRML's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GRML's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to GRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check GRML's competition here
SILV vs GRMLW Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRMLW has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while GRMLW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas GRMLW's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GRMLW's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to GRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check GRMLW's competition here
SILV vs TRQ Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check TRQ's competition here
SILV vs ERS Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ERS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ERS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ERS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is more volatile compared to ERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check ERS's competition here
SILV vs HDLS Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HDLS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while HDLS trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas HDLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HDLS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is more volatile compared to HDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check HDLS's competition here
SILV vs ATL Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while ATL trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas ATL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ATL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SILV has daily volatility of 2.21 and ATL has daily volatility of N/A.Check ATL's competition here
SILV vs SWC Comparison June 2026
SILV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILV stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SWC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SILV is priced at $11.55, while SWC trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILV currently has a P/E ratio of 19.91, whereas SWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILV's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SWC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILV is less volatile compared to SWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILV.Check SWC's competition here