Mako Mining Corp Common Stock
Mako Mining Corp Common Stock (MAKO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MAKO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAKO | $8.70 | +9.57% | 715.4M | 14.85 | $0.55 | N/A |
| BVN | $34.41 | +4.70% | 8.6B | 10.28 | $3.30 | +3.36% |
| TFPM | $32.31 | +4.78% | 6.6B | 21.01 | $1.51 | +0.71% |
| AUGO | $76.26 | +6.71% | 6.3B | 67.06 | $1.12 | +2.98% |
| ELVR | $87.30 | +9.24% | 6.2B | -4.97 | -$16.60 | N/A |
| ALM | $18.78 | +9.06% | 4.9B | -36.00 | -$0.49 | N/A |
| ARIS | $17.62 | +3.22% | 3.6B | 20.15 | $0.87 | +1.60% |
| PPTA | $27.21 | +10.41% | 3.4B | -20.38 | -$1.35 | N/A |
| FRGOX | $40.38 | -3.54% | 3.3B | 15.37 | $2.59 | N/A |
| GMTL | $17.38 | +3.15% | 2.9B | -87.10 | -$0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MAKO vs BVN Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while BVN trades at $34.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check BVN's competition here
MAKO vs TFPM Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while TFPM trades at $32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check TFPM's competition here
MAKO vs AUGO Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while AUGO trades at $76.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is 67.06. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AUGO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AUGO's competition here
MAKO vs ELVR Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, ELVR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while ELVR trades at $87.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ELVR's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELVR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ELVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ELVR's competition here
MAKO vs ALM Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while ALM trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ALM's competition here
MAKO vs ARIS Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while ARIS trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ARIS's competition here
MAKO vs PPTA Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while PPTA trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -20.38. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check PPTA's competition here
MAKO vs FRGOX Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, FRGOX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while FRGOX trades at $40.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas FRGOX's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FRGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to FRGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check FRGOX's competition here
MAKO vs GMTL Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, GMTL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while GMTL trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas GMTL's P/E ratio is -87.10. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GMTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GMTL's competition here
MAKO vs AYA Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, AYA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while AYA trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas AYA's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AYA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AYA's competition here
MAKO vs SILV Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SILV's competition here
MAKO vs SLSR Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while SLSR trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -51.89. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SLSR's competition here
MAKO vs MUX Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while MUX trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MUX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check MUX's competition here
MAKO vs ASM Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while ASM trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 39.88. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ASM's competition here
MAKO vs ELE Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while ELE trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is 277.17. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ELE's competition here
MAKO vs GATO Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GATO's competition here
MAKO vs NEWP Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 903.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while NEWP trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -245.50. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NEWP's competition here
MAKO vs SCZM Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, SCZM has a market cap of 774.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while SCZM trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas SCZM's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SCZM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to SCZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SCZM's competition here
MAKO vs MMX Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check MMX's competition here
MAKO vs MTA Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 630.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while MTA trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -168.75. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check MTA's competition here
MAKO vs GROY Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 607.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while GROY trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -160.75. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GROY's competition here
MAKO vs ALOY Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, ALOY has a market cap of 534.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while ALOY trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ALOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALOY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ALOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ALOY's competition here
MAKO vs NSR Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NSR's competition here
MAKO vs ITRG Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 422.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while ITRG trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is 62.38. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ITRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ITRG's competition here
MAKO vs REA Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, REA has a market cap of 399.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while REA trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas REA's P/E ratio is -40.08. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to REA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to REA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check REA's competition here
MAKO vs VOXR Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while VOXR trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VOXR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check VOXR's competition here
MAKO vs GROY-WT Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while GROY-WT trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GROY-WT's competition here
MAKO vs PLG Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 206.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while PLG trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check PLG's competition here
MAKO vs ATLX Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while ATLX trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ATLX's competition here
MAKO vs NEXM Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, NEXM has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while NEXM trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas NEXM's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NEXM's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NEXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NEXM's competition here
MAKO vs LITM Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while LITM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check LITM's competition here
MAKO vs FNUC Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while FNUC trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check FNUC's competition here
MAKO vs GRML Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, GRML has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while GRML trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas GRML's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GRML's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GRML's competition here
MAKO vs GRMLW Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, GRMLW has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while GRMLW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas GRMLW's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GRMLW's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GRMLW's competition here
MAKO vs SWC Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, SWC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while SWC trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas SWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SWC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to SWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SWC's competition here
MAKO vs TRQ Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check TRQ's competition here
MAKO vs HDLS Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, HDLS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while HDLS trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas HDLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HDLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to HDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HDLS's competition here
MAKO vs ATL Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, ATL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while ATL trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ATL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MAKO has daily volatility of 7.51 and ATL has daily volatility of N/A.Check ATL's competition here
MAKO vs ERS Comparison May 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 715.4M. In comparison, ERS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $8.70, while ERS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ERS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ERS's competition here