Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MAKO's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MAKO and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAKO | $7.89 | +8.83% | 691.2M | 13.38 | $0.59 | N/A |
| NEM | $118.14 | +9.93% | 122.8B | 13.80 | $8.56 | +0.96% |
| AEM | $183.47 | +9.68% | 92.8B | 16.24 | $11.30 | +1.05% |
| B | $40.15 | +8.37% | 66.1B | 11.74 | $3.42 | +2.55% |
| WPM | $131.53 | +12.02% | 59.7B | 30.52 | $4.31 | +0.64% |
| FNV | $242.24 | +7.19% | 46.7B | 32.42 | $7.47 | +0.75% |
| AU | $87.94 | +8.02% | 44.5B | 11.39 | $7.72 | +5.56% |
| GFI | $36.76 | +6.37% | 33B | 7.46 | $4.93 | +6.86% |
| KGC | $21.42 | +7.48% | 25.4B | 8.47 | $2.53 | +0.78% |
| RGLD | $246.08 | +6.57% | 20.9B | 25.50 | $9.65 | +0.82% |
Stock Comparison
Newmont Corporation (NYSE: NEM)
MAKO vs NEM Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 122.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while NEM trades at $118.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NEM's competition here
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (NYSE: AEM)
MAKO vs AEM Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 92.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while AEM trades at $183.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AEM's competition here
Barrick Mining Corporation (NYSE: B)
MAKO vs B Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, B has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while B trades at $40.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas B's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to B's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to B. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check B's competition here
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (NYSE: WPM)
MAKO vs WPM Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while WPM trades at $131.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to WPM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check WPM's competition here
Franco-Nevada Corporation (NYSE: FNV)
MAKO vs FNV Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while FNV trades at $242.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check FNV's competition here
AngloGold Ashanti Plc (NYSE: AU)
MAKO vs AU Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while AU trades at $87.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AU's competition here
Gold Fields Limited (NYSE: GFI)
MAKO vs GFI Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while GFI trades at $36.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GFI's competition here
Kinross Gold Corporation (NYSE: KGC)
MAKO vs KGC Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while KGC trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check KGC's competition here
Royal Gold, Inc. (NASDAQ: RGLD)
MAKO vs RGLD Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while RGLD trades at $246.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check RGLD's competition here
Pan American Silver Corp. (NYSE: PAAS)
MAKO vs PAAS Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, PAAS has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while PAAS trades at $41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PAAS's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PAAS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to PAAS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check PAAS's competition here
Coeur Mining, Inc. (NYSE: CDE)
MAKO vs CDE Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while CDE trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to CDE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check CDE's competition here
Equinox Gold Corp. (AMEX: EQX)
MAKO vs EQX Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while EQX trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to EQX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check EQX's competition here
Alamos Gold Inc. (NYSE: AGI)
MAKO vs AGI Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while AGI trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AGI's competition here
Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (NYSE: HMY)
MAKO vs HMY Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while HMY trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to HMY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HMY's competition here
Iamgold Corporation (NYSE: IAG)
MAKO vs IAG Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while IAG trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check IAG's competition here
Eldorado Gold Corporation (NYSE: EGO)
MAKO vs EGO Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while EGO trades at $33.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to EGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check EGO's competition here
New Gold Inc. (AMEX: NGD)
MAKO vs NGD Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while NGD trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NGD's competition here
B2Gold Corp. (AMEX: BTG)
MAKO vs BTG Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while BTG trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BTG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check BTG's competition here
OR Royalties Inc. (NYSE: OR)
MAKO vs OR Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while OR trades at $34.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check OR's competition here
Aura Minerals (NASDAQ: AUGO)
MAKO vs AUGO Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while AUGO trades at $72.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AUGO's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AUGO's competition here
OceanaGold Corporation (NYSE: OGC)
MAKO vs OGC Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, OGC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while OGC trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas OGC's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OGC's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to OGC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check OGC's competition here
SSR Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: SSRM)
MAKO vs SSRM Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while SSRM trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SSRM's competition here
Yamana Gold Inc. (NYSE: AUY)
MAKO vs AUY Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AUY's competition here
Centerra Gold Inc. (NYSE: CGAU)
MAKO vs CGAU Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while CGAU trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check CGAU's competition here
Aris Mining Corporation (AMEX: ARMN)
MAKO vs ARMN Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while ARMN trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 71.22. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ARMN's competition here
Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (NYSE: SAND)
MAKO vs SAND Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while SAND trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SAND's competition here
Orla Mining Ltd. (AMEX: ORLA)
MAKO vs ORLA Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while ORLA trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ORLA's competition here
Aris Mining Corporation (NYSE: ARIS)
MAKO vs ARIS Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while ARIS trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ARIS's competition here
Allied Gold Corporation (NYSE: AAUC)
MAKO vs AAUC Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, AAUC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while AAUC trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AAUC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AAUC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AAUC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AAUC's competition here
Fortuna Mining Corp. (NYSE: FSM)
MAKO vs FSM Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, FSM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while FSM trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas FSM's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FSM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to FSM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check FSM's competition here
Seabridge Gold Inc. (NYSE: SA)
MAKO vs SA Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while SA trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SA's P/E ratio is 133.37. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SA's competition here
NovaGold Resources Inc. (AMEX: NG)
MAKO vs NG Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while NG trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NG's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NG's competition here
DRDGOLD Limited (NYSE: DRD)
MAKO vs DRD Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while DRD trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check DRD's competition here
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: HYMC)
MAKO vs HYMC Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while HYMC trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HYMC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HYMC's competition here
i-80 Gold Corp (AMEX: IAUX)
MAKO vs IAUX Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while IAUX trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -8.06. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check IAUX's competition here
Collective Mining Ltd. (NASDAQ: CNL)
MAKO vs CNL Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while CNL trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -18.90. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CNL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check CNL's competition here
Dakota Gold Corp. (AMEX: DC)
MAKO vs DC Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 767.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while DC trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -19.07. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check DC's competition here
Osisko Gold Group Inc. (NYSE: OGG)
MAKO vs OGG Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, OGG has a market cap of 742.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while OGG trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas OGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OGG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to OGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check OGG's competition here
Osisko Development Corp. (NYSE: ODV)
MAKO vs ODV Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 694.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while ODV trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -7.91. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ODV's competition here
Gold Royalty Corp. (AMEX: GROY)
MAKO vs GROY Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 667.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while GROY trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is 310.68. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GROY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GROY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GROY's competition here
New Found Gold Corp (AMEX: NFGC)
MAKO vs NFGC Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 628.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while NFGC trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NFGC's competition here
Galiano Gold Inc. (AMEX: GAU)
MAKO vs GAU Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 544.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while GAU trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GAU's competition here
Gold Royalty Corp. (AMEX: GROY-WT)
MAKO vs GROY-WT Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 530.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while GROY-WT trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is -83.88. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GROY-WT's competition here
Contango Silver & Gold Inc. (AMEX: CTGO)
MAKO vs CTGO Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 508.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while CTGO trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CTGO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check CTGO's competition here
International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (AMEX: THM)
MAKO vs THM Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 453.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while THM trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -129.48. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check THM's competition here
Golden Star Resources Ltd. (AMEX: GSS)
MAKO vs GSS Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GSS's competition here
Dakota Gold Corp. WT (AMEX: DC-WT)
MAKO vs DC-WT Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 438.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while DC-WT trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check DC-WT's competition here
Corvus Gold Inc. (NASDAQ: KOR)
MAKO vs KOR Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, KOR has a market cap of 415.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while KOR trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas KOR's P/E ratio is -20.58. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KOR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to KOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check KOR's competition here
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (AMEX: CMCL)
MAKO vs CMCL Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 399.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while CMCL trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check CMCL's competition here
Vista Gold Corp. (AMEX: VGZ)
MAKO vs VGZ Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 392.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while VGZ trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is -44.83. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to VGZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check VGZ's competition here
Gold X2 Mining Inc. (AMEX: AUXX)
MAKO vs AUXX Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, AUXX has a market cap of 390.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while AUXX trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AUXX's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AUXX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AUXX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AUXX's competition here
TRX Gold Corporation (AMEX: TRX)
MAKO vs TRX Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 317.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while TRX trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -31.24. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check TRX's competition here
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (AMEX: IDR)
MAKO vs IDR Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 317M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while IDR trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check IDR's competition here
Goldgroup Mining Inc. (AMEX: GORO)
MAKO vs GORO Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 232.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while GORO trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is 61.60. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GORO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GORO's competition here
U.S. Gold Corp. (NASDAQ: USAU)
MAKO vs USAU Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while USAU trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to USAU's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check USAU's competition here
Mayfair Gold Corp. (AMEX: MINE)
MAKO vs MINE Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 167.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while MINE trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MINE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check MINE's competition here
GoldMining Inc. (AMEX: GLDG)
MAKO vs GLDG Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while GLDG trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GLDG's competition here
Gold Standard Ventures Corp (AMEX: GSV)
MAKO vs GSV Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GSV's competition here
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (NYSE: FSLUF)
MAKO vs FSLUF Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, FSLUF has a market cap of 87.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while FSLUF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas FSLUF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FSLUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to FSLUF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check FSLUF's competition here
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (AMEX: PZG)
MAKO vs PZG Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while PZG trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check PZG's competition here
Namib Minerals Warrants (NASDAQ: NAMMW)
MAKO vs NAMMW Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, NAMMW has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while NAMMW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas NAMMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NAMMW's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NAMMW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NAMMW's competition here
Scorpio Gold Corporation American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: SGLD)
MAKO vs SGLD Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, SGLD has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while SGLD trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SGLD's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SGLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SGLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SGLD's competition here
Namib Minerals (NASDAQ: NAMM)
MAKO vs NAMM Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, NAMM has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while NAMM trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas NAMM's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NAMM's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NAMM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NAMM's competition here
Almaden Minerals Ltd. (AMEX: AAU)
MAKO vs AAU Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AAU's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AAU's competition here
Austin Gold Corp. (AMEX: AUST)
MAKO vs AUST Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while AUST trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AUST's competition here
Osisko Development Corp. Warrant expiring 5/27/2027 (NASDAQ: ODVWZ)
MAKO vs ODVWZ Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while ODVWZ trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ODVWZ's competition here
Blue Gold Limited (NASDAQ: BGLWW)
MAKO vs BGLWW Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, BGLWW has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while BGLWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas BGLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BGLWW's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to BGLWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check BGLWW's competition here
Blue Gold Limited (NASDAQ: BGL)
MAKO vs BGL Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, BGL has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while BGL trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas BGL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BGL's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to BGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check BGL's competition here
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: HYMCZ)
MAKO vs HYMCZ Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HYMCZ's competition here
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: HYMCL)
MAKO vs HYMCL Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while HYMCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HYMCL's competition here
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: HYMCW)
MAKO vs HYMCW Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HYMCW's competition here
Klondex Mines Ltd. (NYSE: KLDX)
MAKO vs KLDX Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, KLDX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while KLDX trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas KLDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KLDX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to KLDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check KLDX's competition here
Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. (NYSE: KL)
MAKO vs KL Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check KL's competition here
Pretium Resources Inc. (NYSE: PVG)
MAKO vs PVG Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check PVG's competition here
Great Panther Mining Limited (AMEX: GPL)
MAKO vs GPL Comparison November 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 691.2M. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.89 on the NASDAQ, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GPL's competition here