Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MAKO's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MAKO and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAKO | $9.36 | +6.12% | 788.1M | 15.26 | $0.59 | N/A |
| NEM | $117.84 | +3.79% | 121.7B | 13.50 | $8.56 | +0.87% |
| AEM | $189.02 | +4.78% | 93.1B | 16.27 | $11.30 | +0.93% |
| B | $41.06 | +4.80% | 67B | 13.03 | $3.07 | +2.31% |
| WPM | $138.65 | +3.71% | 61.3B | 31.31 | $4.31 | +0.54% |
| FNV | $244.85 | +2.92% | 46.4B | 32.18 | $7.47 | +0.69% |
| AU | $94.16 | +4.56% | 45.9B | 11.76 | $7.72 | +4.78% |
| GFI | $36.82 | +5.05% | 32.1B | 7.28 | $4.93 | +6.40% |
| KGC | $23.74 | +2.42% | 27.7B | 9.22 | $2.53 | +0.65% |
| RGLD | $236.23 | +3.66% | 19.6B | 23.96 | $9.65 | +0.80% |
Stock Comparison
Newmont Corporation (NYSE: NEM)
MAKO vs NEM Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 121.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while NEM trades at $117.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NEM's competition here
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (NYSE: AEM)
MAKO vs AEM Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while AEM trades at $189.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AEM's competition here
Barrick Mining Corporation (NYSE: B)
MAKO vs B Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, B has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while B trades at $41.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas B's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to B's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to B. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check B's competition here
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (NYSE: WPM)
MAKO vs WPM Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while WPM trades at $138.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check WPM's competition here
Franco-Nevada Corporation (NYSE: FNV)
MAKO vs FNV Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while FNV trades at $244.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check FNV's competition here
AngloGold Ashanti Plc (NYSE: AU)
MAKO vs AU Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while AU trades at $94.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AU's competition here
Gold Fields Limited (NYSE: GFI)
MAKO vs GFI Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while GFI trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GFI's competition here
Kinross Gold Corporation (NYSE: KGC)
MAKO vs KGC Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while KGC trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check KGC's competition here
Royal Gold, Inc. (NASDAQ: RGLD)
MAKO vs RGLD Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while RGLD trades at $236.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check RGLD's competition here
Pan American Silver Corp. (NYSE: PAAS)
MAKO vs PAAS Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, PAAS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while PAAS trades at $46.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas PAAS's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PAAS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to PAAS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check PAAS's competition here
Coeur Mining, Inc. (NYSE: CDE)
MAKO vs CDE Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while CDE trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check CDE's competition here
Alamos Gold Inc. (NYSE: AGI)
MAKO vs AGI Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while AGI trades at $32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AGI's competition here
Iamgold Corporation (NYSE: IAG)
MAKO vs IAG Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while IAG trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check IAG's competition here
Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (NYSE: HMY)
MAKO vs HMY Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while HMY trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HMY's competition here
Eldorado Gold Corporation (NYSE: EGO)
MAKO vs EGO Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while EGO trades at $37.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check EGO's competition here
Equinox Gold Corp. (AMEX: EQX)
MAKO vs EQX Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while EQX trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check EQX's competition here
New Gold Inc. (AMEX: NGD)
MAKO vs NGD Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while NGD trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NGD's competition here
SSR Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: SSRM)
MAKO vs SSRM Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while SSRM trades at $35.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SSRM's competition here
Aura Minerals (NASDAQ: AUGO)
MAKO vs AUGO Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while AUGO trades at $91.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AUGO's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AUGO's competition here
B2Gold Corp. (AMEX: BTG)
MAKO vs BTG Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while BTG trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BTG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check BTG's competition here
OR Royalties Inc. (NYSE: OR)
MAKO vs OR Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while OR trades at $34.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check OR's competition here
OceanaGold Corporation (NYSE: OGC)
MAKO vs OGC Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, OGC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while OGC trades at $27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas OGC's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OGC's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to OGC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check OGC's competition here
Yamana Gold Inc. (NYSE: AUY)
MAKO vs AUY Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AUY's competition here
Centerra Gold Inc. (NYSE: CGAU)
MAKO vs CGAU Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while CGAU trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check CGAU's competition here
Aris Mining Corporation (AMEX: ARMN)
MAKO vs ARMN Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while ARMN trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 71.22. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ARMN's competition here
Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (NYSE: SAND)
MAKO vs SAND Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while SAND trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SAND's competition here
Orla Mining Ltd. (AMEX: ORLA)
MAKO vs ORLA Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while ORLA trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ORLA's competition here
Aris Mining Corporation (NYSE: ARIS)
MAKO vs ARIS Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while ARIS trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ARIS's competition here
Fortuna Mining Corp. (NYSE: FSM)
MAKO vs FSM Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, FSM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while FSM trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas FSM's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FSM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to FSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check FSM's competition here
Seabridge Gold Inc. (NYSE: SA)
MAKO vs SA Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while SA trades at $28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas SA's P/E ratio is 142.71. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to SA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SA's competition here
NovaGold Resources Inc. (AMEX: NG)
MAKO vs NG Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while NG trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -36.79. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NG's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NG's competition here
Allied Gold Corporation (NYSE: AAUC)
MAKO vs AAUC Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, AAUC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while AAUC trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas AAUC's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AAUC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AAUC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AAUC's competition here
DRDGOLD Limited (NYSE: DRD)
MAKO vs DRD Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while DRD trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check DRD's competition here
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: HYMC)
MAKO vs HYMC Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while HYMC trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -16.55. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HYMC's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HYMC's competition here
i-80 Gold Corp (AMEX: IAUX)
MAKO vs IAUX Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while IAUX trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check IAUX's competition here
Elemental Royalty Corporation (NASDAQ: ELE)
MAKO vs ELE Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while ELE trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is -140.04. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ELE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ELE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ELE's competition here
Collective Mining Ltd. (NASDAQ: CNL)
MAKO vs CNL Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while CNL trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -18.17. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CNL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check CNL's competition here
Scorpio Gold Corporation American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: SGLD)
MAKO vs SGLD Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, SGLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while SGLD trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas SGLD's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SGLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SGLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SGLD's competition here
Osisko Gold Group Inc. (NYSE: OGG)
MAKO vs OGG Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, OGG has a market cap of 847.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while OGG trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas OGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OGG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to OGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check OGG's competition here
Dakota Gold Corp. (AMEX: DC)
MAKO vs DC Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 793.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while DC trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check DC's competition here
Gold Royalty Corp. (AMEX: GROY)
MAKO vs GROY Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 697M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while GROY trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is 325.78. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GROY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to GROY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GROY's competition here
Osisko Development Corp. (NYSE: ODV)
MAKO vs ODV Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 694.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while ODV trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -7.91. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ODV's competition here
International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (AMEX: THM)
MAKO vs THM Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 609.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while THM trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -173.88. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check THM's competition here
Gold Royalty Corp. (AMEX: GROY-WT)
MAKO vs GROY-WT Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 601.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while GROY-WT trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is -95.06. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GROY-WT's competition here
Galiano Gold Inc. (AMEX: GAU)
MAKO vs GAU Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 549.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while GAU trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GAU's competition here
Contango Silver & Gold Inc. (AMEX: CTGO)
MAKO vs CTGO Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 526.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while CTGO trades at $16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CTGO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check CTGO's competition here
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (AMEX: CMCL)
MAKO vs CMCL Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 471.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while CMCL trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check CMCL's competition here
Golden Star Resources Ltd. (AMEX: GSS)
MAKO vs GSS Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GSS's competition here
Dakota Gold Corp. WT (AMEX: DC-WT)
MAKO vs DC-WT Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 438.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while DC-WT trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check DC-WT's competition here
Corvus Gold Inc. (NASDAQ: KOR)
MAKO vs KOR Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, KOR has a market cap of 415.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while KOR trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas KOR's P/E ratio is -20.58. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KOR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to KOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check KOR's competition here
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (AMEX: IDR)
MAKO vs IDR Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 415.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while IDR trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check IDR's competition here
Vista Gold Corp. (AMEX: VGZ)
MAKO vs VGZ Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 390.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while VGZ trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is -44.58. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to VGZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check VGZ's competition here
New Found Gold Corp (AMEX: NFGC)
MAKO vs NFGC Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 378.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while NFGC trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NFGC's competition here
TRX Gold Corporation (AMEX: TRX)
MAKO vs TRX Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 368.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while TRX trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -36.24. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check TRX's competition here
U.S. Gold Corp. (NASDAQ: USAU)
MAKO vs USAU Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while USAU trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to USAU's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check USAU's competition here
GoldMining Inc. (AMEX: GLDG)
MAKO vs GLDG Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 190.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while GLDG trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -12.66. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GLDG's competition here
Mayfair Gold Corp. (AMEX: MINE)
MAKO vs MINE Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 171.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while MINE trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -11.21. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MINE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to MINE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check MINE's competition here
Gold Standard Ventures Corp (AMEX: GSV)
MAKO vs GSV Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GSV's competition here
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (AMEX: PZG)
MAKO vs PZG Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while PZG trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check PZG's competition here
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (NYSE: FSLUF)
MAKO vs FSLUF Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, FSLUF has a market cap of 87.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while FSLUF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas FSLUF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FSLUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to FSLUF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check FSLUF's competition here
Namib Minerals (NASDAQ: NAMM)
MAKO vs NAMM Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, NAMM has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while NAMM trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas NAMM's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NAMM's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NAMM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NAMM's competition here
Namib Minerals Warrants (NASDAQ: NAMMW)
MAKO vs NAMMW Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, NAMMW has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while NAMMW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas NAMMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NAMMW's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NAMMW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NAMMW's competition here
Almaden Minerals Ltd. (AMEX: AAU)
MAKO vs AAU Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AAU's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AAU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AAU's competition here
Austin Gold Corp. (AMEX: AUST)
MAKO vs AUST Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while AUST trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AUST's competition here
Osisko Development Corp. Warrant expiring 5/27/2027 (NASDAQ: ODVWZ)
MAKO vs ODVWZ Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while ODVWZ trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ODVWZ's competition here
Blue Gold Limited (NASDAQ: BGL)
MAKO vs BGL Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, BGL has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while BGL trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas BGL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BGL's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to BGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check BGL's competition here
Atlas Critical Minerals Corporation (NASDAQ: ATCX)
MAKO vs ATCX Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, ATCX has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while ATCX trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ATCX's competition here
Blue Gold Limited (NASDAQ: BGLWW)
MAKO vs BGLWW Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, BGLWW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while BGLWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas BGLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BGLWW's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to BGLWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check BGLWW's competition here
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: HYMCZ)
MAKO vs HYMCZ Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HYMCZ's competition here
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: HYMCL)
MAKO vs HYMCL Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while HYMCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HYMCL's competition here
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: HYMCW)
MAKO vs HYMCW Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HYMCW's competition here
Klondex Mines Ltd. (NYSE: KLDX)
MAKO vs KLDX Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, KLDX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while KLDX trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas KLDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KLDX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to KLDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check KLDX's competition here
Great Panther Mining Limited (AMEX: GPL)
MAKO vs GPL Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GPL's competition here
Pretium Resources Inc. (NYSE: PVG)
MAKO vs PVG Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check PVG's competition here
Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. (NYSE: KL)
MAKO vs KL Comparison October 2026
Mako Mining Corp. (NASDAQ: MAKO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 788.1M. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $9.36 on the NASDAQ, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check KL's competition here