Mako Mining Corp Common Stock (MAKO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MAKO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAKO | $7.94 | +4.61% | 695.3M | 14.44 | $0.55 | N/A |
| BVN | $34.86 | +4.31% | 8.9B | 8.46 | $4.12 | +3.30% |
| ELVR | $102.33 | +21.09% | 7.7B | -6.16 | -$16.60 | N/A |
| TFPM | $30.74 | +5.42% | 6.3B | 20.35 | $1.51 | +0.76% |
| AUGO | $66.18 | +8.69% | 5.5B | 59.09 | $1.12 | +3.38% |
| ALM | $17.96 | +1.58% | 5.1B | -37.42 | -$0.48 | N/A |
| ARIS | $17.30 | +8.87% | 3.6B | 19.89 | $0.87 | +1.63% |
| FRGOX | $39.52 | +9.56% | 3.5B | 14.39 | $2.60 | N/A |
| PPTA | $26.01 | +7.97% | 3.3B | -19.27 | -$1.35 | N/A |
| AYA | $20.65 | +10.37% | 3B | 34.42 | $0.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MAKO vs BVN Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while BVN trades at $34.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check BVN's competition here
MAKO vs ELVR Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, ELVR has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while ELVR trades at $102.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas ELVR's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELVR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ELVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ELVR's competition here
MAKO vs TFPM Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while TFPM trades at $30.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check TFPM's competition here
MAKO vs AUGO Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while AUGO trades at $66.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is 59.09. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AUGO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AUGO's competition here
MAKO vs ALM Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while ALM trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -37.42. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ALM's competition here
MAKO vs ARIS Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while ARIS trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ARIS's competition here
MAKO vs FRGOX Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, FRGOX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while FRGOX trades at $39.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas FRGOX's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FRGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to FRGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check FRGOX's competition here
MAKO vs PPTA Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while PPTA trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -19.27. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check PPTA's competition here
MAKO vs AYA Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, AYA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while AYA trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas AYA's P/E ratio is 34.42. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AYA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to AYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AYA's competition here
MAKO vs GMTL Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, GMTL has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while GMTL trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas GMTL's P/E ratio is -76.45. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GMTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GMTL's competition here
MAKO vs SSMR Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, SSMR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while SSMR trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas SSMR's P/E ratio is -60.48. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SSMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SSMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SSMR's competition here
MAKO vs SILV Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SILV's competition here
MAKO vs SLSR Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while SLSR trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -52.84. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SLSR's competition here
MAKO vs MUX Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while MUX trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MUX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check MUX's competition here
MAKO vs ASM Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while ASM trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ASM's competition here
MAKO vs ELE Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while ELE trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is 269.33. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ELE's competition here
MAKO vs GATO Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GATO's competition here
MAKO vs ALOY Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, ALOY has a market cap of 942.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while ALOY trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas ALOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALOY's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ALOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ALOY's competition here
MAKO vs NEWP Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 891.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while NEWP trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -242.25. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NEWP's competition here
MAKO vs MMX Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check MMX's competition here
MAKO vs MTA Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 717.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while MTA trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -192.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check MTA's competition here
MAKO vs SCZM Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, SCZM has a market cap of 700.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while SCZM trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas SCZM's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SCZM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SCZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SCZM's competition here
MAKO vs GROY Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 564M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while GROY trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -149.25. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GROY's competition here
MAKO vs GROY-WT Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 563.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while GROY-WT trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GROY-WT's competition here
MAKO vs NSR Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NSR's competition here
MAKO vs ITRG Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 459.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while ITRG trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is 67.88. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ITRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ITRG's competition here
MAKO vs REA Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, REA has a market cap of 352.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while REA trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas REA's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to REA's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to REA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check REA's competition here
MAKO vs VOXR Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 295.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while VOXR trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VOXR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check VOXR's competition here
MAKO vs SBMT Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, SBMT has a market cap of 256.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while SBMT trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas SBMT's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SBMT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SBMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SBMT's competition here
MAKO vs PLG Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while PLG trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -31.60. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check PLG's competition here
MAKO vs ATLX Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while ATLX trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ATLX's competition here
MAKO vs NEXM Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, NEXM has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while NEXM trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas NEXM's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NEXM's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NEXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NEXM's competition here
MAKO vs LITM Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while LITM trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check LITM's competition here
MAKO vs FNUC Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while FNUC trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check FNUC's competition here
MAKO vs GRML Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, GRML has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while GRML trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas GRML's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GRML's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GRML's competition here
MAKO vs GRMLW Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, GRMLW has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while GRMLW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas GRMLW's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GRMLW's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GRMLW's competition here
MAKO vs ATL Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, ATL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while ATL trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas ATL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MAKO has daily volatility of 4.21 and ATL has daily volatility of N/A.Check ATL's competition here
MAKO vs SWC Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, SWC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while SWC trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas SWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SWC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to SWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SWC's competition here
MAKO vs TRQ Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check TRQ's competition here
MAKO vs ERS Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, ERS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while ERS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas ERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ERS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ERS's competition here
MAKO vs HDLS Comparison June 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 695.3M. In comparison, HDLS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $7.94, while HDLS trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.44, whereas HDLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HDLS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to HDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HDLS's competition here