Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd.
Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. (TRQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRQ | $31.41 | -0.91% | 0 | 11.90 | $2.64 | N/A |
| BVN | $32.87 | -3.35% | 8.4B | 9.96 | $3.30 | +3.46% |
| TFPM | $30.83 | -2.71% | 6.4B | 20.43 | $1.51 | +0.74% |
| ELVR | $79.91 | -2.60% | 6B | -4.81 | -$16.60 | N/A |
| AUGO | $71.46 | -5.53% | 6B | 63.80 | $1.12 | +3.12% |
| ALM | $17.22 | -0.46% | 4.8B | -35.15 | -$0.49 | N/A |
| ARIS | $17.07 | -5.95% | 3.5B | 19.61 | $0.87 | +1.63% |
| FRGOX | $39.85 | -5.50% | 3.4B | 16.15 | $2.59 | N/A |
| PPTA | $24.64 | -7.51% | 3.1B | -18.25 | -$1.35 | N/A |
| GMTL | $16.85 | -0.88% | 2.9B | -85.75 | -$0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRQ vs BVN Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while BVN trades at $32.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check BVN's competition here
TRQ vs TFPM Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while TFPM trades at $30.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check TFPM's competition here
TRQ vs ELVR Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, ELVR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while ELVR trades at $79.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ELVR's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELVR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to ELVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check ELVR's competition here
TRQ vs AUGO Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while AUGO trades at $71.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is 63.80. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUGO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check AUGO's competition here
TRQ vs ALM Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while ALM trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -35.15. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check ALM's competition here
TRQ vs ARIS Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while ARIS trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check ARIS's competition here
TRQ vs FRGOX Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, FRGOX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while FRGOX trades at $39.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas FRGOX's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is more volatile compared to FRGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check FRGOX's competition here
TRQ vs PPTA Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while PPTA trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check PPTA's competition here
TRQ vs GMTL Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, GMTL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while GMTL trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GMTL's P/E ratio is -85.75. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to GMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check GMTL's competition here
TRQ vs AYA Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, AYA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while AYA trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas AYA's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AYA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to AYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check AYA's competition here
TRQ vs SILV Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check SILV's competition here
TRQ vs SLSR Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while SLSR trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -49.58. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check SLSR's competition here
TRQ vs MUX Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while MUX trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check MUX's competition here
TRQ vs ASM Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while ASM trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check ASM's competition here
TRQ vs ELE Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while ELE trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is 264.67. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to ELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check ELE's competition here
TRQ vs GATO Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check GATO's competition here
TRQ vs NEWP Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 874.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while NEWP trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -237.50. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check NEWP's competition here
TRQ vs SCZM Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, SCZM has a market cap of 760.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while SCZM trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SCZM's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCZM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to SCZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check SCZM's competition here
TRQ vs MMX Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check MMX's competition here
TRQ vs MAKO Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, MAKO has a market cap of 695.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while MAKO trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MAKO's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAKO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to MAKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check MAKO's competition here
TRQ vs MTA Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 610.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while MTA trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -130.70. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check MTA's competition here
TRQ vs GROY Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 586.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while GROY trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -155.25. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check GROY's competition here
TRQ vs ALOY Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, ALOY has a market cap of 533.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while ALOY trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ALOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALOY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to ALOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check ALOY's competition here
TRQ vs NSR Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check NSR's competition here
TRQ vs REA Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, REA has a market cap of 418.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while REA trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas REA's P/E ratio is -41.94. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to REA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check REA's competition here
TRQ vs ITRG Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 408.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while ITRG trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is 60.38. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check ITRG's competition here
TRQ vs VOXR Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while VOXR trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is 59.70. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VOXR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check VOXR's competition here
TRQ vs GROY-WT Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 245.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while GROY-WT trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check GROY-WT's competition here
TRQ vs PLG Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while PLG trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -31.70. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check PLG's competition here
TRQ vs ATLX Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while ATLX trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check ATLX's competition here
TRQ vs NEXM Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, NEXM has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while NEXM trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas NEXM's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEXM's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to NEXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check NEXM's competition here
TRQ vs LITM Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while LITM trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check LITM's competition here
TRQ vs FNUC Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while FNUC trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check FNUC's competition here
TRQ vs GRML Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, GRML has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while GRML trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GRML's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRML's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to GRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check GRML's competition here
TRQ vs GRMLW Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, GRMLW has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while GRMLW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas GRMLW's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRMLW's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to GRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check GRMLW's competition here
TRQ vs HDLS Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, HDLS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while HDLS trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas HDLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HDLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is more volatile compared to HDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check HDLS's competition here
TRQ vs ERS Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, ERS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while ERS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is more volatile compared to ERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check ERS's competition here
TRQ vs ATL Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, ATL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while ATL trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas ATL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRQ has daily volatility of 0.76 and ATL has daily volatility of N/A.Check ATL's competition here
TRQ vs SWC Comparison May 2026
TRQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRQ stands at 0. In comparison, SWC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRQ is priced at $31.41, while SWC trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRQ currently has a P/E ratio of 11.90, whereas SWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRQ's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRQ is less volatile compared to SWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRQ.Check SWC's competition here