Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (SCZM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SCZM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCZM | $6.69 | +1.52% | 620.4M | 30.41 | $0.22 | N/A |
| HL-PB | $65.32 | +0.00% | 10.4B | 92.68 | $0.70 | +0.09% |
| BVN | $29.70 | +1.71% | 7.5B | 7.43 | $4.00 | +3.82% |
| TFPM | $31.49 | +4.34% | 6.5B | 24.99 | $1.26 | +0.73% |
| OGC | $26.10 | +4.32% | 5.8B | 7.96 | $3.28 | N/A |
| AUGO | $65.46 | +8.20% | 5.5B | 18.23 | $3.59 | +3.44% |
| ELVR | $69.67 | +5.05% | 5.2B | -4.20 | -$16.60 | N/A |
| ALM | $15.71 | -1.50% | 4.5B | -27.72 | -$0.57 | N/A |
| ARIS | $16.00 | +9.44% | 3.3B | 9.47 | $1.69 | +1.75% |
| AAUC | $24.60 | +3.75% | 3.1B | 17.83 | $1.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SCZM vs HL-PB Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while HL-PB trades at $65.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 92.68. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check HL-PB's competition here
SCZM vs BVN Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while BVN trades at $29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check BVN's competition here
SCZM vs TFPM Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while TFPM trades at $31.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check TFPM's competition here
SCZM vs OGC Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, OGC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while OGC trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas OGC's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to OGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check OGC's competition here
SCZM vs AUGO Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while AUGO trades at $65.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AUGO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check AUGO's competition here
SCZM vs ELVR Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, ELVR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while ELVR trades at $69.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas ELVR's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ELVR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to ELVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check ELVR's competition here
SCZM vs ALM Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while ALM trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -27.72. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALM's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check ALM's competition here
SCZM vs ARIS Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while ARIS trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check ARIS's competition here
SCZM vs AAUC Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, AAUC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while AAUC trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas AAUC's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AAUC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to AAUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check AAUC's competition here
SCZM vs AYA Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, AYA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while AYA trades at $19.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas AYA's P/E ratio is 59.45. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AYA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to AYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check AYA's competition here
SCZM vs PPTA Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while PPTA trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -16.16. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check PPTA's competition here
SCZM vs GMTL Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, GMTL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while GMTL trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas GMTL's P/E ratio is -93.13. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GMTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to GMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check GMTL's competition here
SCZM vs SSMR Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, SSMR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while SSMR trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas SSMR's P/E ratio is -59.14. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SSMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to SSMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check SSMR's competition here
SCZM vs TMCWW Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while TMCWW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +65.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check TMCWW's competition here
SCZM vs SILV Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check SILV's competition here
SCZM vs SLSR Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while SLSR trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -46.94. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check SLSR's competition here
SCZM vs MUX Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while MUX trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MUX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check MUX's competition here
SCZM vs ASM Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while ASM trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check ASM's competition here
SCZM vs ELE Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while ELE trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is -137.08. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ELE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to ELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check ELE's competition here
SCZM vs GATO Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check GATO's competition here
SCZM vs ALOY Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, ALOY has a market cap of 812.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while ALOY trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas ALOY's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALOY's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to ALOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check ALOY's competition here
SCZM vs NEWP Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 787.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while NEWP trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -147.43. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check NEWP's competition here
SCZM vs MMX Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check MMX's competition here
SCZM vs MAKO Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, MAKO has a market cap of 669.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while MAKO trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas MAKO's P/E ratio is 29.42. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MAKO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to MAKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check MAKO's competition here
SCZM vs GROY-WT Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 541.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while GROY-WT trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is -97.85. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check GROY-WT's competition here
SCZM vs GROY Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 540.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while GROY trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -266.54. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check GROY's competition here
SCZM vs BMM Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, BMM has a market cap of 534.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while BMM trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas BMM's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BMM's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to BMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check BMM's competition here
SCZM vs NVAWW Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 506.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while NVAWW trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check NVAWW's competition here
SCZM vs NSR Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check NSR's competition here
SCZM vs ITRG Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 409.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while ITRG trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ITRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check ITRG's competition here
SCZM vs REA Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, REA has a market cap of 278.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while REA trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas REA's P/E ratio is -60.91. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to REA's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to REA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check REA's competition here
SCZM vs VOXR Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 269.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while VOXR trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VOXR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check VOXR's competition here
SCZM vs SBMT Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, SBMT has a market cap of 229.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while SBMT trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas SBMT's P/E ratio is -33.74. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SBMT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to SBMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check SBMT's competition here
SCZM vs PLG Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while PLG trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -23.67. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check PLG's competition here
SCZM vs NAMM Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, NAMM has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while NAMM trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas NAMM's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NAMM's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to NAMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check NAMM's competition here
SCZM vs ATLX Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while ATLX trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check ATLX's competition here
SCZM vs NEXM Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, NEXM has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while NEXM trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas NEXM's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NEXM's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to NEXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check NEXM's competition here
SCZM vs ZTEK Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, ZTEK has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while ZTEK trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas ZTEK's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZTEK's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to ZTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check ZTEK's competition here
SCZM vs FNUC Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while FNUC trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check FNUC's competition here
SCZM vs WWR Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while WWR trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check WWR's competition here
SCZM vs BLBX Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, BLBX has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while BLBX trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas BLBX's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BLBX's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to BLBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check BLBX's competition here
SCZM vs GRML Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, GRML has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while GRML trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas GRML's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GRML's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to GRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check GRML's competition here
SCZM vs GRMLW Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, GRMLW has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while GRMLW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas GRMLW's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GRMLW's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to GRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check GRMLW's competition here
SCZM vs BGLWW Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, BGLWW has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while BGLWW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas BGLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BGLWW's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is less volatile compared to BGLWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check BGLWW's competition here
SCZM vs HDLS Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, HDLS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while HDLS trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas HDLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HDLS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to HDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check HDLS's competition here
SCZM vs SWC Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, SWC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while SWC trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas SWC's P/E ratio is 117.73. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SWC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to SWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check SWC's competition here
SCZM vs TRQ Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check TRQ's competition here
SCZM vs ERS Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, ERS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while ERS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas ERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ERS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCZM is more volatile compared to ERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCZM.Check ERS's competition here
SCZM vs ATL Comparison July 2026
SCZM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCZM stands at 620.4M. In comparison, ATL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCZM is priced at $6.69, while ATL trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCZM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.41, whereas ATL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCZM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ATL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SCZM has daily volatility of 7.51 and ATL has daily volatility of N/A.Check ATL's competition here