The Macerich Company
The Macerich Company (MAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAC | $19.22 | +2.23% | 4.9B | -24.65 | -$0.78 | +3.63% |
| SPG | $192.83 | -1.03% | 63B | 13.62 | $14.16 | +4.49% |
| O | $64.94 | -0.09% | 60.6B | 55.51 | $1.17 | +4.99% |
| SPG-PJ | $54.16 | +0.11% | 55.9B | 7.99 | $6.78 | +4.49% |
| KIM-PN | $61.07 | +0.00% | 41.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.44% |
| KIM | $23.20 | -0.34% | 15.7B | 28.28 | $0.82 | +4.44% |
| REG | $78.23 | -0.55% | 14.3B | 27.74 | $2.82 | +3.67% |
| KIM-PM | $20.66 | -0.22% | 13.9B | 12.54 | $1.65 | +4.44% |
| KIM-PL | $20.02 | -0.05% | 13.5B | 12.14 | $1.65 | +4.44% |
| ADC | $81.06 | -0.36% | 9.7B | 45.81 | $1.77 | +3.83% |
Stock Comparison
MAC vs SPG Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while SPG trades at $192.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SPG's competition here
MAC vs O Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, O has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while O trades at $64.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas O's P/E ratio is 55.51. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check O's competition here
MAC vs SPG-PJ Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while SPG-PJ trades at $54.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
MAC vs KIM-PN Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while KIM-PN trades at $61.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KIM-PN's competition here
MAC vs KIM Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while KIM trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KIM's competition here
MAC vs REG Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while REG trades at $78.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check REG's competition here
MAC vs KIM-PM Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while KIM-PM trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KIM-PM's competition here
MAC vs KIM-PL Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while KIM-PL trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KIM-PL's competition here
MAC vs ADC Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while ADC trades at $81.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 45.81. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ADC's competition here
MAC vs FRT Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while FRT trades at $106.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check FRT's competition here
MAC vs BRX Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while BRX trades at $29.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BRX's competition here
MAC vs NNN Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while NNN trades at $45.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check NNN's competition here
MAC vs FRT-PC Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while FRT-PC trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check FRT-PC's competition here
MAC vs KRG Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while KRG trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KRG's competition here
MAC vs PECO Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while PECO trades at $38.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 43.38. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PECO's competition here
MAC vs REGCP Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while REGCP trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check REGCP's competition here
MAC vs SKT Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while SKT trades at $35.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 36.28. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SKT's competition here
MAC vs REGCO Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while REGCO trades at $22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check REGCO's competition here
MAC vs CURB Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while CURB trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 72.76. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CURB's competition here
MAC vs FCPT Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while FCPT trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check FCPT's competition here
MAC vs AKR Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while AKR trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 207.40. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check AKR's competition here
MAC vs IVT Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while IVT trades at $31.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check IVT's competition here
MAC vs ROIC Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ROIC's competition here
MAC vs GTY Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while GTY trades at $33.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check GTY's competition here
MAC vs ADC-PA Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while ADC-PA trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ADC-PA's competition here
MAC vs NTST Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while NTST trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 261.38. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check NTST's competition here
MAC vs ALX Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while ALX trades at $240.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 43.64. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ALX's competition here
MAC vs CBL Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while CBL trades at $38.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CBL's competition here
MAC vs RPT-PD Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check RPT-PD's competition here
MAC vs BFS Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while BFS trades at $34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BFS's competition here
MAC vs UBP Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check UBP's competition here
MAC vs UBA Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check UBA's competition here
MAC vs WSR Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 826M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while WSR trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WSR's competition here
MAC vs UBP-PK Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check UBP-PK's competition here
MAC vs BFS-PD Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 767.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while BFS-PD trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BFS-PD's competition here
MAC vs UBP-PH Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check UBP-PH's competition here
MAC vs BFS-PE Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 531.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while BFS-PE trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BFS-PE's competition here
MAC vs SITC-PA Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SITC-PA's competition here
MAC vs SITC Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 316.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while SITC trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SITC's competition here
MAC vs PINE Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 293.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while PINE trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -88.45. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PINE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PINE's competition here
MAC vs CDR-PB Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while CDR-PB trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CDR-PB's competition here
MAC vs CDR-PC Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 268.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while CDR-PC trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CDR-PC's competition here
MAC vs SRG-PA Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while SRG-PA trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -13.42. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SRG-PA's competition here
MAC vs SRG Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 159.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while SRG trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SRG's competition here
MAC vs WHLRL Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while WHLRL trades at $95.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -51.16. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WHLRL's competition here
MAC vs WHLRP Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while WHLRP trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WHLRP's competition here
MAC vs WHLRD Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while WHLRD trades at $37.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -19.63. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WHLRD's competition here
MAC vs WHLR Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 317.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while WHLR trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WHLR's competition here
MAC vs BPYUP Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BPYUP's competition here
MAC vs PEI-PD Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PEI-PD's competition here
MAC vs PEI-PB Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PEI-PB's competition here
MAC vs PEI Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PEI's competition here
MAC vs RVI Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while RVI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check RVI's competition here
MAC vs CDR Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CDR's competition here
MAC vs WRI Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WRI's competition here
MAC vs HMG Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check HMG's competition here
MAC vs BPYU Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BPYU's competition here
MAC vs NNN-PF Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check NNN-PF's competition here
MAC vs PEI-PC Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PEI-PC's competition here
MAC vs WPG Comparison March 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 4.9B. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $19.22, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -24.65, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WPG's competition here