LSB Industries, Inc.
LSB Industries, Inc. LXU Peers
See (LXU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LXU | $8.21 | +0.06% | 590.8M | -22.22 | -$0.37 | N/A |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 25.7B | N/A | N/A | +7.12% |
| DOW | $28.73 | +0.00% | 20.1B | 71.15 | $0.40 | +9.83% |
| CE | $60.62 | +0.00% | 6.7B | -4.03 | -$15.12 | +2.39% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $34.22 | -0.01% | 2.3B | 11.22 | $3.06 | +2.15% |
| HUN | $11.32 | +0.00% | 1.9B | -14.24 | -$0.78 | +9.00% |
| BAK | $3.35 | +0.00% | 1.4B | -0.80 | -$4.28 | N/A |
| TROX | $5.53 | +0.00% | 884.2M | -5.87 | -$0.95 | +8.96% |
| WLKP | $22.38 | +0.00% | 791.5M | 15.07 | $1.49 | +8.40% |
Stock Comparison
LXU vs SHLM Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs DOW Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while DOW trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is 71.15. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DOW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs CE Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while CE trades at $60.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs UNVR Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs MEOH Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while MEOH trades at $34.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs HUN Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while HUN trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs BAK Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while BAK trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BAK's ROE of +27.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is more volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs TROX Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 884.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while TROX trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs WLKP Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 791.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while WLKP trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs ASIX Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 678.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while ASIX trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs ASPI Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 579.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while ASPI trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -11.71. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs VHI Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 512.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while VHI trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VHI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs SIRE Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs CINR Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs RYAM Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while RYAM trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs FF Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while FF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -29.79. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is more volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs ORGN Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while ORGN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs FMST Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while FMST trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs FMSTW Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while FMSTW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs ORGNW Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while ORGNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.
LXU vs MKD Comparison
LXU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LXU stands at 590.8M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LXU is priced at $8.21, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LXU currently has a P/E ratio of -22.22, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LXU's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LXU is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LXU.