Larsen & Toubro Limited (LT.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LT.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT.NS | ₹4,179.40 | -0.52% | 5.7T | 35.72 | ₹117.02 | +0.91% |
| LT.BO | ₹4,176.50 | -0.57% | 5.7T | 32.65 | ₹127.91 | +0.91% |
| RVNL.BO | ₹240.10 | -2.46% | 500.7B | 57.17 | ₹4.20 | +1.10% |
| RVNL.NS | ₹240.13 | -2.46% | 500.7B | 56.32 | ₹4.26 | +1.10% |
| NBCC.NS | ₹109.04 | -0.85% | 294.4B | 43.39 | ₹2.51 | +0.62% |
| NBCC.BO | ₹108.95 | -0.95% | 291.9B | 40.96 | ₹2.66 | +0.62% |
| KPIL.NS | ₹1,439.60 | -0.01% | 245.8B | 23.64 | ₹60.90 | +0.63% |
| KPIL.BO | ₹1,438.40 | -0.45% | 244.7B | 23.60 | ₹60.95 | +0.63% |
| ITDCEM.BO | ₹1,235.45 | -2.74% | 212.2B | 51.76 | ₹23.87 | +0.24% |
| CEMPRO.NS | ₹1,222.50 | -3.98% | 210B | 35.12 | ₹34.81 | +0.24% |
Stock Comparison
LT.NS vs LT.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, LT.BO has a market cap of 5.7T. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while LT.BO trades at ₹4,176.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas LT.BO's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to LT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check LT.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs RVNL.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 500.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹240.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 57.17. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check RVNL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs RVNL.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 500.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹240.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 56.32. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check RVNL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs NBCC.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 294.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹109.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 43.39. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check NBCC.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs NBCC.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 291.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹108.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check NBCC.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs KPIL.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 245.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,439.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KPIL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs KPIL.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 244.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,438.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KPIL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs ITDCEM.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 212.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹1,235.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 51.76. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs CEMPRO.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 210B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹1,222.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 35.12. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs CEMPRO.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 210B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹1,222.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs ENGINERSIN.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 146.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹260.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs ENGINERSIN.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 145.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹260.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs KEC.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 144.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while KEC.NS trades at ₹542.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is more volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KEC.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs KEC.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 144.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while KEC.BO trades at ₹542.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is more volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KEC.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs IRCON.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, IRCON.NS has a market cap of 128.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while IRCON.NS trades at ₹136.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas IRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRCON.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to IRCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check IRCON.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs IRCON.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 128.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹136.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check IRCON.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs TECHNOE.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹1,086.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs TECHNOE.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹1,088.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs AFCONS.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹314.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 46.11. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs ITDCEM.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹601.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs RITES.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while RITES.NS trades at ₹209.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check RITES.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs RITES.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 100.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while RITES.BO trades at ₹209.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check RITES.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs NCC.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while NCC.NS trades at ₹156.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check NCC.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs NCC.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while NCC.BO trades at ₹156.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check NCC.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs GRINFRA.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 93.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹963.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs GRINFRA.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 93.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹964.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs POWERMECH.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹2,854.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs POWERMECH.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹2,847.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs KALPATPOWR.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs AXISCADES.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹1,841.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 106.46. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs AXISCADES.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹1,839.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 109.43. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs WELENT.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹567.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check WELENT.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs WELENT.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹567.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check WELENT.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs DBL.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while DBL.NS trades at ₹459.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check DBL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs DBL.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while DBL.BO trades at ₹458.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check DBL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs LOTUSDEV.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹144.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs LOTUSDEV.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹142.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs GVPIL.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹1,034.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs GVPIL.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹1,033.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs TRANSRAILL.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹509.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs TRANSRAILL.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹509.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs CEIGALL.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, CEIGALL.NS has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while CEIGALL.NS trades at ₹372.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas CEIGALL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEIGALL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CEIGALL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CEIGALL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs PRAJIND.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹343.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 59.88. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs PRAJIND.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹342.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 265.85. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs SKIPPER.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, SKIPPER.NS has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while SKIPPER.NS trades at ₹546.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas SKIPPER.NS's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKIPPER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check SKIPPER.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs SKIPPER.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹547.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs PNCINFRA.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹235.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs PNCINFRA.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹235.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs AHLUCONT.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹848.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs AHLUCONT.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹847.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs HCC.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, HCC.NS has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while HCC.NS trades at ₹27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas HCC.NS's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to HCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check HCC.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs HCC.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while HCC.BO trades at ₹27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 38.80. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check HCC.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs MANINFRA.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹104.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs MANINFRA.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹103.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs EIEL.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹226.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check EIEL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs KNRCON.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹136.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs JKIL.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹508.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check JKIL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs JKIL.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹509.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to JKIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check JKIL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs KNRCON.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹136.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs PSPPROJECT.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹962.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 68.77. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs PSPPROJECT.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹962.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 68.82. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs BONDADA.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹341.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs HGINFRA.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹582.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs HGINFRA.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹582.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs ASHOKA.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹134.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs ASHOKA.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹134.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs DREDGECORP.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, DREDGECORP.BO has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while DREDGECORP.BO trades at ₹1,219.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas DREDGECORP.BO's P/E ratio is 228.73. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DREDGECORP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check DREDGECORP.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs DREDGECORP.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, DREDGECORP.NS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while DREDGECORP.NS trades at ₹1,218.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas DREDGECORP.NS's P/E ratio is 229.12. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DREDGECORP.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check DREDGECORP.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs ORIANA.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, ORIANA.NS has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while ORIANA.NS trades at ₹1,605.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas ORIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIANA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ORIANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ORIANA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs INTERARCH.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹1,914.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs PATELENG.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹32.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs PATELENG.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹32.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs RAMKY.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹414.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs RAMKY.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹412.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs VINDHYATEL.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while VINDHYATEL.NS trades at ₹2,162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas VINDHYATEL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VINDHYATEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs VINDHYATEL.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.BO has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while VINDHYATEL.BO trades at ₹2,162.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas VINDHYATEL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VINDHYATEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs EMSLIMITED.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹445.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs EMSLIMITED.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹447.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs GEPIL.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs GEPIL.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs BGRENERGY.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹334.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs BGRENERGY.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs KPEL.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, KPEL.NS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while KPEL.NS trades at ₹344.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas KPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPEL.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KPEL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs CAPACITE.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, CAPACITE.NS has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while CAPACITE.NS trades at ₹267.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas CAPACITE.NS's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPACITE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CAPACITE.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs CAPACITE.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, CAPACITE.BO has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while CAPACITE.BO trades at ₹267.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas CAPACITE.BO's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPACITE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CAPACITE.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs WALCHANNAG.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, WALCHANNAG.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while WALCHANNAG.BO trades at ₹294.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas WALCHANNAG.BO's P/E ratio is -134.93. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WALCHANNAG.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to WALCHANNAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check WALCHANNAG.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs JMCPROJECT.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs WALCHANNAG.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, WALCHANNAG.NS has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while WALCHANNAG.NS trades at ₹294.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas WALCHANNAG.NS's P/E ratio is -134.86. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WALCHANNAG.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to WALCHANNAG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check WALCHANNAG.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹250.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹250.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 48.20. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs CFF.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, CFF.BO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while CFF.BO trades at ₹860.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas CFF.BO's P/E ratio is 45.16. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CFF.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CFF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CFF.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs GARUDA.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, GARUDA.NS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while GARUDA.NS trades at ₹190.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas GARUDA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GARUDA.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GARUDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GARUDA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs GARUDA.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, GARUDA.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while GARUDA.BO trades at ₹190.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas GARUDA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GARUDA.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GARUDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GARUDA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs MBEL.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹306.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check MBEL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs SPMLINFRA.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while SPMLINFRA.NS trades at ₹204.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas SPMLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs SPMLINFRA.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while SPMLINFRA.BO trades at ₹204.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas SPMLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 37.11. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPMLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs INDIANHUME.NS Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹324.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs INDIANHUME.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹324.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs GPTINFRA.BO Comparison June 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.7T. In comparison, GPTINFRA.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,179.40, while GPTINFRA.BO trades at ₹134.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 35.72, whereas GPTINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPTINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GPTINFRA.BO's competition here