Larsen & Toubro Limited
Larsen & Toubro Limited (LT.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LT.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT.NS | ₹4,076.30 | +2.94% | 5.4T | 30.92 | ₹127.90 | +0.86% |
| LT.BO | ₹4,075.85 | +2.93% | 5.4T | 30.91 | ₹127.91 | +0.86% |
| RVNL.BO | ₹287.15 | +4.38% | 567.1B | 49.45 | ₹5.50 | +1.00% |
| RVNL.NS | ₹287.06 | +4.39% | 566.7B | 49.33 | ₹5.51 | +1.00% |
| NBCC.BO | ₹90.96 | +2.03% | 239.4B | 36.64 | ₹2.42 | +0.77% |
| NBCC.NS | ₹91.00 | +2.04% | 239.4B | 36.63 | ₹2.42 | +0.77% |
| KPIL.BO | ₹1,213.80 | +2.72% | 200B | 23.95 | ₹48.92 | +0.77% |
| KPIL.NS | ₹1,212.00 | +2.43% | 200B | 23.96 | ₹48.87 | +0.77% |
| KEC.NS | ₹565.35 | -1.45% | 150.1B | 21.75 | ₹25.93 | +0.98% |
| KEC.BO | ₹565.60 | -1.45% | 150.1B | 21.74 | ₹25.94 | +0.98% |
Stock Comparison
LT.NS vs LT.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, LT.BO has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while LT.BO trades at ₹4,075.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas LT.BO's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is more volatile compared to LT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check LT.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs RVNL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 567.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹287.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.45. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check RVNL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs RVNL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 566.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹287.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 49.33. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check RVNL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs NBCC.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 239.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹90.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check NBCC.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs NBCC.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 239.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹91.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 36.63. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check NBCC.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs KPIL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 200B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,213.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KPIL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs KPIL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 200B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,212.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KPIL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs KEC.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 150.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while KEC.NS trades at ₹565.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KEC.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs KEC.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 150.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while KEC.BO trades at ₹565.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KEC.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs TECHNOE.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 129.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹1,195.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs TECHNOE.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 129.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹1,196.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs IRCON.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, IRCON.NS has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while IRCON.NS trades at ₹141.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas IRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to IRCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check IRCON.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs IRCON.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹141.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check IRCON.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs ENGINERSIN.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 122.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹219.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs ENGINERSIN.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 122.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹219.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs AFCONS.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 112.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹337.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs CEMPRO.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹638.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs CEMPRO.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 106.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹639.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs ITDCEM.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 106.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹638.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs ITDCEM.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹601.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs RITES.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while RITES.NS trades at ₹212.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check RITES.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs RITES.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while RITES.BO trades at ₹212.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check RITES.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs NCC.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while NCC.NS trades at ₹155.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check NCC.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs NCC.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while NCC.BO trades at ₹155.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check NCC.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs KALPATPOWR.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs GRINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹882.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs GRINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 81.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹884.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs TRANSRAILL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹558.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs TRANSRAILL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹558.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs DBL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while DBL.BO trades at ₹453.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check DBL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs DBL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while DBL.NS trades at ₹453.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check DBL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs AXISCADES.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹1,710.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 67.88. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs AXISCADES.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹1,711.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 69.40. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs POWERMECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹2,306.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs POWERMECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹2,304.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs LOTUSDEV.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs LOTUSDEV.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs PRAJIND.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹352.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 59.93. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs PRAJIND.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹352.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 121.25. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs WELENT.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹449.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check WELENT.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs WELENT.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹448.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check WELENT.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs AHLUCONT.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹817.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs AHLUCONT.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹817.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs CEIGALL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, CEIGALL.NS has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while CEIGALL.NS trades at ₹299.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CEIGALL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEIGALL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CEIGALL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CEIGALL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs PNCINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹197.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs PNCINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹196.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs SKIPPER.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, SKIPPER.NS has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while SKIPPER.NS trades at ₹401.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SKIPPER.NS's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKIPPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check SKIPPER.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs SKIPPER.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹402.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs ORIANA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, ORIANA.NS has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while ORIANA.NS trades at ₹2,021.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ORIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIANA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ORIANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ORIANA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs MANINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹96.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs MANINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹96.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs HGINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹629.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs HGINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹630.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs JKIL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹488.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to JKIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check JKIL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs JKIL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹487.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check JKIL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs BONDADA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs EIEL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹213.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check EIEL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs ASHOKA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹135.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs ASHOKA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹135.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs RAMKY.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹510.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs RAMKY.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹510.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs KNRCON.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹124.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs KNRCON.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹124.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs HCC.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, HCC.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while HCC.NS trades at ₹18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas HCC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to HCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check HCC.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs INTERARCH.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹1,931.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is more volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs GVPIL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹497.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs GVPIL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹496.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs HCC.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while HCC.BO trades at ₹18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check HCC.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs PSPPROJECT.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹710.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 66.88. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs PSPPROJECT.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹713.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 64.55. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs PATELENG.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs PATELENG.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹27.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs DREDGECORP.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, DREDGECORP.NS has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while DREDGECORP.NS trades at ₹905.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DREDGECORP.NS's P/E ratio is -37.94. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DREDGECORP.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check DREDGECORP.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs DREDGECORP.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, DREDGECORP.BO has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while DREDGECORP.BO trades at ₹904.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DREDGECORP.BO's P/E ratio is -37.97. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DREDGECORP.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check DREDGECORP.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs GEPIL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs GEPIL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs BGRENERGY.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹349.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is more volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs BGRENERGY.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹346.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is more volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs KPEL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, KPEL.NS has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while KPEL.NS trades at ₹329.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPEL.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to KPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check KPEL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs JMCPROJECT.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs CAPACITE.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, CAPACITE.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while CAPACITE.NS trades at ₹250.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CAPACITE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPACITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CAPACITE.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs CAPACITE.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, CAPACITE.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while CAPACITE.BO trades at ₹250.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CAPACITE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPACITE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CAPACITE.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs CEINSYSTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, CEINSYSTECH.BO has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while CEINSYSTECH.BO trades at ₹1,110.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CEINSYSTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CEINSYSTECH.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs EMSLIMITED.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹335.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs EMSLIMITED.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹336.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs MBEL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹321.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check MBEL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹226.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹226.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs INDIANHUME.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹327.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs INDIANHUME.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹325.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs GARUDA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, GARUDA.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while GARUDA.NS trades at ₹173.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GARUDA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GARUDA.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GARUDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GARUDA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs GARUDA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, GARUDA.BO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while GARUDA.BO trades at ₹174.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GARUDA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GARUDA.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GARUDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GARUDA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs CFF.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, CFF.BO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while CFF.BO trades at ₹694.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CFF.BO's P/E ratio is 48.70. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CFF.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to CFF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check CFF.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs VINDHYATEL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while VINDHYATEL.NS trades at ₹1,380.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas VINDHYATEL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VINDHYATEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs VINDHYATEL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.BO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while VINDHYATEL.BO trades at ₹1,387.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas VINDHYATEL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VINDHYATEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs SPMLINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while SPMLINFRA.BO trades at ₹196.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SPMLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPMLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs SPMLINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while SPMLINFRA.NS trades at ₹196.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SPMLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.NS vs GPTINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, GPTINFRA.BO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while GPTINFRA.BO trades at ₹115.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GPTINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPTINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GPTINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.NS vs GPTINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.NS stands at 5.4T. In comparison, GPTINFRA.NS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.NS is priced at ₹4,076.30, while GPTINFRA.NS trades at ₹115.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GPTINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, LT.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPTINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.NS is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.NS.Check GPTINFRA.NS's competition here