Hindustan Construction Company Limited
Hindustan Construction Company Limited (HCC.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HCC.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCC.NS | ₹22.38 | +9.28% | 39.1B | 27.83 | ₹0.75 | N/A |
| LT.BO | ₹4,033.30 | +2.68% | 5.4T | 30.70 | ₹127.91 | +0.97% |
| LT.NS | ₹4,033.40 | +2.67% | 5.4T | 33.58 | ₹116.93 | +0.97% |
| RVNL.BO | ₹272.55 | +0.74% | 565.4B | 49.12 | ₹5.52 | +1.00% |
| RVNL.NS | ₹272.45 | +0.63% | 565.2B | 49.11 | ₹5.52 | +1.00% |
| NBCC.NS | ₹96.79 | +4.00% | 256B | 39.18 | ₹2.42 | +0.72% |
| NBCC.BO | ₹96.78 | +4.01% | 255.9B | 39.17 | ₹2.42 | +0.72% |
| KPIL.BO | ₹1,273.30 | -0.15% | 216.5B | 20.80 | ₹60.95 | +0.71% |
| KPIL.NS | ₹1,273.00 | -0.30% | 216.5B | 20.80 | ₹60.93 | +0.71% |
| TECHNOE.NS | ₹1,373.00 | +6.08% | 155.2B | 33.02 | ₹40.41 | +0.67% |
Stock Comparison
HCC.NS vs LT.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, LT.BO has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while LT.BO trades at ₹4,033.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas LT.BO's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to LT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check LT.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs LT.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, LT.NS has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while LT.NS trades at ₹4,033.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas LT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to LT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check LT.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs RVNL.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 565.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹272.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.12. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check RVNL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs RVNL.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 565.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹272.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 49.11. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check RVNL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs NBCC.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 256B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹96.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 39.18. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check NBCC.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs NBCC.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 255.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹96.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check NBCC.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs KPIL.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 216.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,273.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KPIL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs KPIL.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 216.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,273.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KPIL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs TECHNOE.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹1,373.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs TECHNOE.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 155.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹1,370.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.99. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs CEMPRO.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹879.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs ITDCEM.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 147.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹882.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 36.03. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs CEMPRO.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 147.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹882.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs IRCON.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹142.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check IRCON.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs IRCON.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, IRCON.NS has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while IRCON.NS trades at ₹142.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas IRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to IRCON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check IRCON.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs KEC.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while KEC.BO trades at ₹507.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KEC.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs KEC.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while KEC.NS trades at ₹507.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KEC.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs ENGINERSIN.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 121.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹228.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs ENGINERSIN.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 121.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹228.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs AFCONS.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹303.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs ITDCEM.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹601.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs RITES.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while RITES.NS trades at ₹207.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check RITES.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs RITES.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while RITES.BO trades at ₹207.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check RITES.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs NCC.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while NCC.NS trades at ₹150.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check NCC.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs NCC.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while NCC.BO trades at ₹151.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check NCC.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs GRINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹946.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs GRINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹945.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs KALPATPOWR.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs AXISCADES.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹2,045.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 83.97. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to AXISCADES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs AXISCADES.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹2,044.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 83.54. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs POWERMECH.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹2,546.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs POWERMECH.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹2,547.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs PRAJIND.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹393.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 138.39. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs PRAJIND.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹393.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 68.07. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs DBL.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while DBL.NS trades at ₹435.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check DBL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs DBL.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while DBL.BO trades at ₹437.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check DBL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs WELENT.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹500.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check WELENT.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs WELENT.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹500.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check WELENT.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs TRANSRAILL.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹510.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs TRANSRAILL.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹510.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs LOTUSDEV.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹141.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs LOTUSDEV.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹141.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs CEIGALL.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, CEIGALL.NS has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while CEIGALL.NS trades at ₹341.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas CEIGALL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEIGALL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to CEIGALL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CEIGALL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs PNCINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹212.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs PNCINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹212.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs AHLUCONT.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹807.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs AHLUCONT.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹807.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs SKIPPER.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, SKIPPER.NS has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while SKIPPER.NS trades at ₹480.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas SKIPPER.NS's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKIPPER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to SKIPPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SKIPPER.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs SKIPPER.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹480.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs GVPIL.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹768.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs GVPIL.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹768.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs MANINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹115.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs MANINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs HGINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹602.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs HGINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹602.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs BONDADA.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹340.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs ORIANA.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, ORIANA.NS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while ORIANA.NS trades at ₹1,962.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas ORIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORIANA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to ORIANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ORIANA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs HCC.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while HCC.BO trades at ₹22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check HCC.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs KNRCON.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹133.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs KNRCON.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹133.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs JKIL.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹508.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to JKIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check JKIL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs JKIL.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹508.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check JKIL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs ASHOKA.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹123.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs ASHOKA.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹123.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs EIEL.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹209.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check EIEL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs RAMKY.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹459.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs RAMKY.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹460.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs PSPPROJECT.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹773.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 73.36. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs PSPPROJECT.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹772.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 73.61. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs DREDGECORP.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, DREDGECORP.BO has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while DREDGECORP.BO trades at ₹1,073.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas DREDGECORP.BO's P/E ratio is -44.39. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DREDGECORP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to DREDGECORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check DREDGECORP.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs DREDGECORP.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, DREDGECORP.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while DREDGECORP.NS trades at ₹1,072.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas DREDGECORP.NS's P/E ratio is -44.48. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DREDGECORP.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check DREDGECORP.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs INTERARCH.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹1,813.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs PATELENG.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs PATELENG.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs KPEL.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, KPEL.NS has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while KPEL.NS trades at ₹368.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas KPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KPEL.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to KPEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KPEL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs GEPIL.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs GEPIL.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs BGRENERGY.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹297.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs BGRENERGY.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹299.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs JMCPROJECT.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs VINDHYATEL.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while VINDHYATEL.NS trades at ₹1,773.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas VINDHYATEL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VINDHYATEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs VINDHYATEL.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.BO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while VINDHYATEL.BO trades at ₹1,768.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas VINDHYATEL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VINDHYATEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs CAPACITE.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, CAPACITE.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while CAPACITE.BO trades at ₹225.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas CAPACITE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAPACITE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to CAPACITE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CAPACITE.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs CAPACITE.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, CAPACITE.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while CAPACITE.NS trades at ₹224.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas CAPACITE.NS's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAPACITE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to CAPACITE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CAPACITE.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs EMSLIMITED.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹336.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs EMSLIMITED.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹336.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹238.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs MBEL.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹310.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check MBEL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs INDIANHUME.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹317.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs INDIANHUME.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹317.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs CEINSYSTECH.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, CEINSYSTECH.BO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while CEINSYSTECH.BO trades at ₹903.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas CEINSYSTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CEINSYSTECH.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs SPMLINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while SPMLINFRA.NS trades at ₹211.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas SPMLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs SPMLINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while SPMLINFRA.BO trades at ₹211.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas SPMLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 37.46. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPMLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs CFF.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, CFF.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while CFF.BO trades at ₹753.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas CFF.BO's P/E ratio is 39.83. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CFF.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to CFF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CFF.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs GARUDA.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, GARUDA.BO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while GARUDA.BO trades at ₹171.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas GARUDA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GARUDA.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to GARUDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GARUDA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs GARUDA.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, GARUDA.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while GARUDA.NS trades at ₹171.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas GARUDA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GARUDA.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to GARUDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GARUDA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs WALCHANNAG.NS Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, WALCHANNAG.NS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while WALCHANNAG.NS trades at ₹245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas WALCHANNAG.NS's P/E ratio is -19.43. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WALCHANNAG.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to WALCHANNAG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check WALCHANNAG.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs WALCHANNAG.BO Comparison May 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 39.1B. In comparison, WALCHANNAG.BO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹22.38, while WALCHANNAG.BO trades at ₹245.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.83, whereas WALCHANNAG.BO's P/E ratio is -19.40. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WALCHANNAG.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to WALCHANNAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check WALCHANNAG.BO's competition here