BF Utilities Limited
BF Utilities Limited (BFUTILITIE.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BFUTILITIE.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFUTILITIE.BO | ₹560.55 | -2.39% | 21B | 13.30 | ₹42.00 | N/A |
| ADANIGREEN.NS | ₹1,290.70 | +3.69% | 2T | 127.04 | ₹9.69 | N/A |
| ADANIGREEN.BO | ₹1,291.10 | +3.67% | 2T | 127.83 | ₹9.59 | N/A |
| ENRIN.NS | ₹3,320.70 | +0.32% | 1.2T | 98.47 | ₹33.31 | +0.12% |
| NTPCGREEN.NS | ₹111.29 | +0.69% | 931B | 160.13 | ₹0.69 | N/A |
| NHPC.NS | ₹83.28 | -0.96% | 838.8B | 53.53 | ₹1.56 | +2.29% |
| NHPC.BO | ₹83.28 | -0.88% | 835.5B | 53.32 | ₹1.56 | +2.29% |
| SUZLON.BO | ₹54.98 | -3.12% | 763.3B | 23.58 | ₹2.36 | N/A |
| SUZLON.NS | ₹54.96 | -3.26% | 763.1B | 23.58 | ₹2.36 | N/A |
| SJVN.NS | ₹79.86 | -0.92% | 310.7B | 48.21 | ₹1.64 | +1.85% |
Stock Comparison
BFUTILITIE.BO vs ADANIGREEN.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, ADANIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while ADANIGREEN.NS trades at ₹1,290.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas ADANIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 127.04. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ADANIGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to ADANIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check ADANIGREEN.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs ADANIGREEN.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, ADANIGREEN.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while ADANIGREEN.BO trades at ₹1,291.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas ADANIGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 127.83. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ADANIGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to ADANIGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check ADANIGREEN.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs ENRIN.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, ENRIN.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while ENRIN.NS trades at ₹3,320.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas ENRIN.NS's P/E ratio is 98.47. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ENRIN.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is more volatile compared to ENRIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check ENRIN.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs NTPCGREEN.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, NTPCGREEN.NS has a market cap of 931B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while NTPCGREEN.NS trades at ₹111.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas NTPCGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 160.13. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to NTPCGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check NTPCGREEN.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs NHPC.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, NHPC.NS has a market cap of 838.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while NHPC.NS trades at ₹83.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas NHPC.NS's P/E ratio is 53.53. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NHPC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is more volatile compared to NHPC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check NHPC.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs NHPC.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, NHPC.BO has a market cap of 835.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while NHPC.BO trades at ₹83.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas NHPC.BO's P/E ratio is 53.32. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NHPC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is more volatile compared to NHPC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check NHPC.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs SUZLON.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, SUZLON.BO has a market cap of 763.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while SUZLON.BO trades at ₹54.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas SUZLON.BO's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SUZLON.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to SUZLON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check SUZLON.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs SUZLON.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, SUZLON.NS has a market cap of 763.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while SUZLON.NS trades at ₹54.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas SUZLON.NS's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SUZLON.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to SUZLON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check SUZLON.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs SJVN.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, SJVN.NS has a market cap of 310.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while SJVN.NS trades at ₹79.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas SJVN.NS's P/E ratio is 48.21. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SJVN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to SJVN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check SJVN.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs SJVN.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, SJVN.BO has a market cap of 310.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while SJVN.BO trades at ₹79.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas SJVN.BO's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SJVN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to SJVN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check SJVN.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs ACMESOLAR.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, ACMESOLAR.BO has a market cap of 184B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while ACMESOLAR.BO trades at ₹298.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas ACMESOLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to ACMESOLAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check ACMESOLAR.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs ACMESOLAR.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, ACMESOLAR.NS has a market cap of 182.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while ACMESOLAR.NS trades at ₹298.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas ACMESOLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 37.53. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ACMESOLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to ACMESOLAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check ACMESOLAR.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs INOXWIND.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, INOXWIND.NS has a market cap of 174.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while INOXWIND.NS trades at ₹103.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas INOXWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 36.84. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INOXWIND.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to INOXWIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check INOXWIND.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs INOXWIND.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, INOXWIND.BO has a market cap of 174.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while INOXWIND.BO trades at ₹103.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas INOXWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INOXWIND.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to INOXWIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check INOXWIND.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs IWEL.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, IWEL.BO has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while IWEL.BO trades at ₹10,301.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas IWEL.BO's P/E ratio is 89.28. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IWEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to IWEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check IWEL.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs IWEL.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, IWEL.NS has a market cap of 124B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while IWEL.NS trades at ₹10,293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas IWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 89.29. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IWEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to IWEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check IWEL.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs WAAREERTL.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, WAAREERTL.NS has a market cap of 106.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while WAAREERTL.NS trades at ₹1,024.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas WAAREERTL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WAAREERTL.NS's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to WAAREERTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check WAAREERTL.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs KPIGREEN.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, KPIGREEN.BO has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while KPIGREEN.BO trades at ₹458.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas KPIGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KPIGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to KPIGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check KPIGREEN.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs KPIGREEN.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, KPIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while KPIGREEN.NS trades at ₹459.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas KPIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KPIGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to KPIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check KPIGREEN.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs INOXGREEN.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, INOXGREEN.NS has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while INOXGREEN.NS trades at ₹188.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas INOXGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 107.11. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INOXGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to INOXGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check INOXGREEN.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs INOXGREEN.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, INOXGREEN.BO has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while INOXGREEN.BO trades at ₹188.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas INOXGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 107.63. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INOXGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to INOXGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check INOXGREEN.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs RTNPOWER.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, RTNPOWER.NS has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while RTNPOWER.NS trades at ₹10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas RTNPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RTNPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to RTNPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check RTNPOWER.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs RTNPOWER.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, RTNPOWER.BO has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while RTNPOWER.BO trades at ₹10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas RTNPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 40.48. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RTNPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to RTNPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check RTNPOWER.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs BFUTILITIE.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, BFUTILITIE.NS has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while BFUTILITIE.NS trades at ₹559.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas BFUTILITIE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to BFUTILITIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check BFUTILITIE.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs INDOWIND.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, INDOWIND.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while INDOWIND.BO trades at ₹10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas INDOWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 123.33. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INDOWIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to INDOWIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check INDOWIND.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs INDOWIND.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, INDOWIND.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while INDOWIND.NS trades at ₹10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas INDOWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 123.22. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INDOWIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to INDOWIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check INDOWIND.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs KARMAENG.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, KARMAENG.NS has a market cap of 606.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while KARMAENG.NS trades at ₹51.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas KARMAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KARMAENG.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to KARMAENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check KARMAENG.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs KARMAENG.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, KARMAENG.BO has a market cap of 574.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while KARMAENG.BO trades at ₹50.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas KARMAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KARMAENG.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to KARMAENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check KARMAENG.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs SMEL.BO Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, SMEL.BO has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while SMEL.BO trades at ₹8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas SMEL.BO's P/E ratio is 437.50. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SMEL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is more volatile compared to SMEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check SMEL.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.BO vs KPIGLOBAL.NS Comparison May 2026
BFUTILITIE.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.BO stands at 21B. In comparison, KPIGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.BO is priced at ₹560.55, while KPIGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹541.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.30, whereas KPIGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.BO is less volatile compared to KPIGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.BO.Check KPIGLOBAL.NS's competition here