Larsen & Toubro Limited
Larsen & Toubro Limited (LT.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LT.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT.BO | ₹4,105.20 | +3.83% | 5.6T | 31.86 | ₹127.91 | +0.83% |
| LT.NS | ₹4,098.80 | +3.65% | 5.6T | 31.87 | ₹127.90 | +0.83% |
| RVNL.BO | ₹291.70 | +7.24% | 598.7B | 52.02 | ₹5.52 | +0.95% |
| RVNL.NS | ₹291.47 | +7.24% | 598.5B | 52.00 | ₹5.52 | +0.95% |
| NBCC.NS | ₹91.93 | +3.70% | 245.7B | 37.60 | ₹2.42 | +0.75% |
| NBCC.BO | ₹91.90 | +3.64% | 245.6B | 37.59 | ₹2.42 | +0.75% |
| KPIL.NS | ₹1,193.20 | +1.90% | 207B | 24.80 | ₹48.87 | +0.74% |
| KPIL.BO | ₹1,193.25 | +1.87% | 206.9B | 24.77 | ₹48.92 | +0.74% |
| KEC.BO | ₹570.00 | +1.07% | 150.6B | 21.80 | ₹25.94 | +0.97% |
| KEC.NS | ₹570.00 | +1.07% | 150.5B | 21.80 | ₹25.93 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
LT.BO vs LT.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, LT.NS has a market cap of 5.6T. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while LT.NS trades at ₹4,098.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas LT.NS's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to LT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check LT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RVNL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 598.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹291.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 52.02. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RVNL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs RVNL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 598.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹291.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RVNL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs NBCC.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 245.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹91.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 37.60. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check NBCC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs NBCC.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 245.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹91.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check NBCC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs KPIL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 207B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,193.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KPIL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs KPIL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 206.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,193.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KPIL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs KEC.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 150.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while KEC.BO trades at ₹570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KEC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs KEC.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 150.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while KEC.NS trades at ₹570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KEC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs TECHNOE.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 139.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹1,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs TECHNOE.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 139B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹1,192.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs IRCON.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, IRCON.NS has a market cap of 133B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while IRCON.NS trades at ₹141.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas IRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to IRCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check IRCON.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs IRCON.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 132.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹141.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check IRCON.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs AFCONS.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹345.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ENGINERSIN.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 123.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹228.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ENGINERSIN.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹225.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs CEMPRO.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 109.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹642.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs CEMPRO.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 109.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹643.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs ITDCEM.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹643.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs ITDCEM.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹601.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RITES.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 102.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while RITES.NS trades at ₹214.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RITES.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RITES.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while RITES.BO trades at ₹214.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RITES.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs NCC.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while NCC.BO trades at ₹156.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check NCC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs NCC.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while NCC.NS trades at ₹156.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check NCC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs GRINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹882.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs GRINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹884.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs KALPATPOWR.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs TRANSRAILL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹557.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs TRANSRAILL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹557.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs DBL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 73.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while DBL.NS trades at ₹452.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check DBL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs DBL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while DBL.BO trades at ₹452.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check DBL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs POWERMECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹2,305.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs POWERMECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹2,297.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs AXISCADES.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹1,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 71.96. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs AXISCADES.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹1,730.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 71.83. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs LOTUSDEV.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹142.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs LOTUSDEV.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹142.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs PRAJIND.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹347.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 123.67. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PRAJIND.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹347.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 61.47. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs WELENT.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹455.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check WELENT.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs WELENT.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹455.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check WELENT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs AHLUCONT.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹811.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs AHLUCONT.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹818.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs CEIGALL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, CEIGALL.NS has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while CEIGALL.NS trades at ₹296.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas CEIGALL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEIGALL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CEIGALL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CEIGALL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PNCINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹200.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs PNCINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹200.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs SKIPPER.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹400.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs SKIPPER.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, SKIPPER.NS has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while SKIPPER.NS trades at ₹401.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas SKIPPER.NS's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKIPPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SKIPPER.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs HGINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹612.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ORIANA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, ORIANA.NS has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while ORIANA.NS trades at ₹2,048.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas ORIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIANA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ORIANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ORIANA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs HGINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹610.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs MANINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹95.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs MANINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹96.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ASHOKA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹135.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs ASHOKA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹135.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs EIEL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹214.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check EIEL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs BONDADA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹341.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs JKIL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹489.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to JKIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check JKIL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs JKIL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹490.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check JKIL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RAMKY.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹508.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RAMKY.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹508.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs KNRCON.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹122.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs KNRCON.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹122.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs HCC.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, HCC.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while HCC.NS trades at ₹18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas HCC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to HCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check HCC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs HCC.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while HCC.BO trades at ₹18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check HCC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GVPIL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹494.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GVPIL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs INTERARCH.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹1,913.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PSPPROJECT.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 66.24. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs PSPPROJECT.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹713.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 68.35. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PATELENG.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PATELENG.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs DREDGECORP.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, DREDGECORP.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while DREDGECORP.NS trades at ₹939.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas DREDGECORP.NS's P/E ratio is -37.79. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DREDGECORP.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check DREDGECORP.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs DREDGECORP.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, DREDGECORP.BO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while DREDGECORP.BO trades at ₹940.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas DREDGECORP.BO's P/E ratio is -37.78. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DREDGECORP.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check DREDGECORP.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs BGRENERGY.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹355.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs BGRENERGY.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹356.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs GEPIL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GEPIL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs KPEL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, KPEL.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while KPEL.NS trades at ₹335.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas KPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPEL.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KPEL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs CAPACITE.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, CAPACITE.BO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while CAPACITE.BO trades at ₹246.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas CAPACITE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPACITE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CAPACITE.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs CAPACITE.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, CAPACITE.NS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while CAPACITE.NS trades at ₹246.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas CAPACITE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPACITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CAPACITE.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs CEINSYSTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, CEINSYSTECH.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while CEINSYSTECH.BO trades at ₹1,124.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas CEINSYSTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CEINSYSTECH.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs JMCPROJECT.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs EMSLIMITED.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹340.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs EMSLIMITED.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹339.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs MBEL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹321.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check MBEL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs SIMPLEXINF.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹227.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs SIMPLEXINF.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹227.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs INDIANHUME.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹323.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs INDIANHUME.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹323.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs VINDHYATEL.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.BO has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while VINDHYATEL.BO trades at ₹1,345.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas VINDHYATEL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VINDHYATEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check VINDHYATEL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs VINDHYATEL.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.NS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while VINDHYATEL.NS trades at ₹1,348.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas VINDHYATEL.NS's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VINDHYATEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check VINDHYATEL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs GARUDA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, GARUDA.BO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while GARUDA.BO trades at ₹173.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas GARUDA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GARUDA.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GARUDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GARUDA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GARUDA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, GARUDA.NS has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while GARUDA.NS trades at ₹173.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas GARUDA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GARUDA.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GARUDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GARUDA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs SPMLINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while SPMLINFRA.NS trades at ₹196.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas SPMLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SPMLINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs SPMLINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while SPMLINFRA.BO trades at ₹195.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas SPMLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPMLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SPMLINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GPTINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, GPTINFRA.BO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while GPTINFRA.BO trades at ₹115.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas GPTINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPTINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GPTINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs CFF.BO Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, CFF.BO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while CFF.BO trades at ₹738.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas CFF.BO's P/E ratio is 47.71. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CFF.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CFF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CFF.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GPTINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.6T. In comparison, GPTINFRA.NS has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,105.20, while GPTINFRA.NS trades at ₹115.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.86, whereas GPTINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPTINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GPTINFRA.NS's competition here