Larsen & Toubro Limited
Larsen & Toubro Limited (LT.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LT.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT.BO | ₹3,973.60 | -1.22% | 5.5T | 31.07 | ₹127.91 | +0.86% |
| LT.NS | ₹3,974.50 | -1.21% | 5.5T | 33.95 | ₹117.07 | +0.86% |
| RVNL.BO | ₹305.00 | -1.20% | 635.9B | 55.25 | ₹5.52 | +0.89% |
| RVNL.NS | ₹305.00 | -1.20% | 635.9B | 55.25 | ₹5.52 | +0.89% |
| NBCC.NS | ₹100.64 | +3.91% | 271.7B | 41.59 | ₹2.42 | +0.68% |
| NBCC.BO | ₹100.61 | +3.96% | 271.6B | 41.57 | ₹2.42 | +0.68% |
| KPIL.NS | ₹1,275.70 | -1.71% | 217.9B | 26.06 | ₹48.96 | +0.71% |
| KPIL.BO | ₹1,274.45 | -2.49% | 217.6B | 26.08 | ₹48.86 | +0.71% |
| CEMPRO.NS | ₹956.15 | -1.46% | 164.3B | 35.04 | ₹27.29 | +0.21% |
| CEMPRO.BO | ₹955.90 | -1.63% | 164.2B | 35.04 | ₹27.28 | +0.21% |
Stock Comparison
LT.BO vs LT.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, LT.NS has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while LT.NS trades at ₹3,974.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas LT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to LT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check LT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RVNL.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 635.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RVNL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs RVNL.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 635.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RVNL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs NBCC.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 271.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹100.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check NBCC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs NBCC.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 271.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹100.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 41.57. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check NBCC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs KPIL.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 217.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KPIL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs KPIL.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 217.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,274.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KPIL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs CEMPRO.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 164.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹956.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs CEMPRO.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 164.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹955.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs ITDCEM.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 163.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹955.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 39.96. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs KEC.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 159.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while KEC.BO trades at ₹598.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KEC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs KEC.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 159.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while KEC.NS trades at ₹598.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KEC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs IRCON.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 148.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹158.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check IRCON.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs IRCON.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, IRCON.NS has a market cap of 148.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while IRCON.NS trades at ₹158.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas IRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to IRCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check IRCON.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs TECHNOE.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹1,260.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs TECHNOE.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹1,257.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ENGINERSIN.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 144.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹256.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs ENGINERSIN.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 144.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹256.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs AFCONS.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 125.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹340.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RITES.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 109.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while RITES.NS trades at ₹227.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RITES.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RITES.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while RITES.BO trades at ₹227.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RITES.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs NCC.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while NCC.NS trades at ₹170.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check NCC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs NCC.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 106.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while NCC.BO trades at ₹169.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check NCC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs ITDCEM.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹601.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs GRINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 94.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹979.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs GRINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹978.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs AXISCADES.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 92.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹2,174.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 91.67. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs AXISCADES.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 92.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹2,173.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 91.64. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs KALPATPOWR.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs POWERMECH.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹2,605.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs POWERMECH.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹2,601.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs DBL.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while DBL.NS trades at ₹478.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check DBL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs DBL.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while DBL.BO trades at ₹478.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check DBL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs TRANSRAILL.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹566.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs TRANSRAILL.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹566.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs PRAJIND.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 74.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹403.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 141.56. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PRAJIND.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹403.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 70.34. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs LOTUSDEV.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹146.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs LOTUSDEV.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹146.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs WELENT.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹522.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check WELENT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs WELENT.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹521.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check WELENT.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs CEIGALL.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, CEIGALL.NS has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while CEIGALL.NS trades at ₹376.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas CEIGALL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEIGALL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CEIGALL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CEIGALL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PNCINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹224.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PNCINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹224.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs AHLUCONT.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹847.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs AHLUCONT.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹847.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs MANINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹134.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs MANINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹134.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs SKIPPER.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, SKIPPER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while SKIPPER.NS trades at ₹466.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas SKIPPER.NS's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKIPPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SKIPPER.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs SKIPPER.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹466.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GVPIL.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹649.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs HCC.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, HCC.NS has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while HCC.NS trades at ₹23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas HCC.NS's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to HCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check HCC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs GVPIL.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹646.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs HCC.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while HCC.BO trades at ₹23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check HCC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs HGINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹626.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs HGINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹625.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs ORIANA.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, ORIANA.NS has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while ORIANA.NS trades at ₹2,001.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas ORIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIANA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ORIANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ORIANA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs BONDADA.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹355.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs JKIL.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹512.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO and JKIL.BO have similar daily volatility (1.45).Check JKIL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs JKIL.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹511.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check JKIL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ASHOKA.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹137.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ASHOKA.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹137.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs EIEL.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹217.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check EIEL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs KNRCON.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs KNRCON.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹131.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs INTERARCH.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹2,134.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RAMKY.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹503.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RAMKY.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹502.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs PSPPROJECT.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹833.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 79.96. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PSPPROJECT.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹831.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 80.42. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs PATELENG.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹28.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs PATELENG.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹28.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs KPEL.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, KPEL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while KPEL.NS trades at ₹405.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas KPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPEL.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KPEL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs DREDGECORP.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, DREDGECORP.NS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while DREDGECORP.NS trades at ₹953.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas DREDGECORP.NS's P/E ratio is -39.86. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DREDGECORP.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check DREDGECORP.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs DREDGECORP.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, DREDGECORP.BO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while DREDGECORP.BO trades at ₹952.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas DREDGECORP.BO's P/E ratio is -39.80. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DREDGECORP.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check DREDGECORP.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GEPIL.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GEPIL.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs CAPACITE.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, CAPACITE.NS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while CAPACITE.NS trades at ₹252.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas CAPACITE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPACITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CAPACITE.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs CAPACITE.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, CAPACITE.BO has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while CAPACITE.BO trades at ₹252.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas CAPACITE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPACITE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CAPACITE.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs VINDHYATEL.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while VINDHYATEL.NS trades at ₹1,797.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas VINDHYATEL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VINDHYATEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check VINDHYATEL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs VINDHYATEL.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while VINDHYATEL.BO trades at ₹1,794.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas VINDHYATEL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VINDHYATEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check VINDHYATEL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs EMSLIMITED.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹363.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs EMSLIMITED.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹363.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs BGRENERGY.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹279.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs BGRENERGY.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹279.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs JMCPROJECT.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs CEINSYSTECH.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, CEINSYSTECH.BO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while CEINSYSTECH.BO trades at ₹1,092.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas CEINSYSTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CEINSYSTECH.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GARUDA.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, GARUDA.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while GARUDA.BO trades at ₹199.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas GARUDA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GARUDA.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GARUDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GARUDA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GARUDA.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, GARUDA.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while GARUDA.NS trades at ₹199.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas GARUDA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GARUDA.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GARUDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GARUDA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs MBEL.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹322.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check MBEL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs INDIANHUME.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹340.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs INDIANHUME.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹340.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs SIMPLEXINF.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹223.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs SIMPLEXINF.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹223.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs WALCHANNAG.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, WALCHANNAG.NS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while WALCHANNAG.NS trades at ₹254.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas WALCHANNAG.NS's P/E ratio is -21.33. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WALCHANNAG.NS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to WALCHANNAG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check WALCHANNAG.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs WALCHANNAG.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, WALCHANNAG.BO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while WALCHANNAG.BO trades at ₹254.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas WALCHANNAG.BO's P/E ratio is -21.30. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WALCHANNAG.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to WALCHANNAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check WALCHANNAG.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs SPMLINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while SPMLINFRA.NS trades at ₹218.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas SPMLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SPMLINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs SPMLINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while SPMLINFRA.BO trades at ₹218.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas SPMLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 39.62. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPMLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SPMLINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs CFF.BO Comparison May 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.5T. In comparison, CFF.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹3,973.60, while CFF.BO trades at ₹792.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 31.07, whereas CFF.BO's P/E ratio is 55.60. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CFF.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CFF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CFF.BO's competition here