Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See GARUDA.BO's competitors and their performance on the BSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for GARUDA.BO and its BSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARUDA.BO | ₹136.55 | -2.46% | 13.2B | 9.69 | ₹14.62 | +0.02% |
| LT.NS | ₹3,871.70 | +0.90% | 5.3T | 29.85 | ₹129.69 | +0.98% |
| LT.BO | ₹3,858.00 | +0.41% | 5.3T | 29.72 | ₹129.82 | +0.98% |
| RVNL.NS | ₹179.67 | -3.40% | 374.6B | 42.14 | ₹4.26 | +0.95% |
| RVNL.BO | ₹179.80 | -3.39% | 374.1B | 42.31 | ₹4.25 | +0.95% |
| CEMPRO.NS | ₹1,265.00 | -1.74% | 232.9B | 34.57 | ₹36.59 | +0.24% |
| KPIL.NS | ₹1,337.70 | -1.43% | 228.4B | 21.02 | ₹63.65 | +0.82% |
| CEMPRO.BO | ₹1,262.80 | -1.98% | 228.1B | 35.63 | ₹35.44 | +0.24% |
| ITDCEM.BO | ₹1,326.00 | -0.17% | 227.8B | 37.42 | ₹35.44 | +0.24% |
| KPIL.BO | ₹1,335.50 | -1.65% | 227.3B | 20.98 | ₹63.66 | +0.82% |
Stock Comparison
Larsen & Toubro Limited (NSE: LT.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs LT.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LT.NS has a market cap of 5.3T. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while LT.NS trades at ₹3,871.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas LT.NS's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LT.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to LT.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check LT.NS's competition here
Larsen & Toubro Limited (BSE: LT.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs LT.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LT.BO has a market cap of 5.3T. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while LT.BO trades at ₹3,858.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas LT.BO's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to LT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check LT.BO's competition here
Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (NSE: RVNL.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs RVNL.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 374.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹179.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 42.14. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check RVNL.NS's competition here
Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (BSE: RVNL.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs RVNL.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 374.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹179.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check RVNL.BO's competition here
Cemindia Projects Limited (NSE: CEMPRO.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs CEMPRO.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 232.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹1,265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here
Kalpataru Projects International Limited (NSE: KPIL.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs KPIL.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 228.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,337.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check KPIL.NS's competition here
Cemindia Projects Limited (BSE: CEMPRO.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs CEMPRO.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 228.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹1,262.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 35.63. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here
Cemindia Projects Ltd (BSE: ITDCEM.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs ITDCEM.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 227.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹1,326.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here
Kalpataru Projects International Limited (BSE: KPIL.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs KPIL.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 227.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,335.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check KPIL.BO's competition here
IRB Infrastructure Developers Limited (BSE: IRB.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs IRB.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, IRB.BO has a market cap of 190B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while IRB.BO trades at ₹15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas IRB.BO's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IRB.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to IRB.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check IRB.BO's competition here
IRB Infrastructure Developers Limited (NSE: IRB.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs IRB.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, IRB.NS has a market cap of 190B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while IRB.NS trades at ₹15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas IRB.NS's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IRB.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to IRB.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check IRB.NS's competition here
NBCC (India) Limited (BSE: NBCC.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs NBCC.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 188.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹69.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check NBCC.BO's competition here
NBCC (India) Limited (NSE: NBCC.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs NBCC.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 188.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹69.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check NBCC.NS's competition here
Engineers India Limited (NSE: ENGINERSIN.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs ENGINERSIN.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 141.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹251.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here
Engineers India Limited (BSE: ENGINERSIN.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs ENGINERSIN.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 141.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹251.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here
Sri Lotus Developers and Realty Limited (NSE: LOTUSDEV.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs LOTUSDEV.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 120.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹245.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 41.05. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here
Sri Lotus Developers and Realty Limited (BSE: LOTUSDEV.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs LOTUSDEV.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 118.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹243.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 40.58. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here
VA Tech Wabag Limited (NSE: WABAG.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs WABAG.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, WABAG.NS has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while WABAG.NS trades at ₹1,812.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas WABAG.NS's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WABAG.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to WABAG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check WABAG.NS's competition here
VA Tech Wabag Limited (BSE: WABAG.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs WABAG.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, WABAG.BO has a market cap of 112B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while WABAG.BO trades at ₹1,807.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas WABAG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WABAG.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to WABAG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check WABAG.BO's competition here
Cemindia Projects Limited (NSE: ITDCEM.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs ITDCEM.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹601.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here
Techno Electric & Engineering Company Limited (BSE: TECHNOE.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs TECHNOE.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹830.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here
Techno Electric & Engineering Company Limited (NSE: TECHNOE.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs TECHNOE.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹829.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here
Ircon International Limited (BSE: IRCON.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs IRCON.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹96.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check IRCON.BO's competition here
Ircon International Limited (NSE: IRCON.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs IRCON.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, IRCON.NS has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while IRCON.NS trades at ₹96.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas IRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IRCON.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to IRCON.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check IRCON.NS's competition here
RITES Limited (NSE: RITES.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs RITES.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while RITES.NS trades at ₹188.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check RITES.NS's competition here
RITES Limited (BSE: RITES.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs RITES.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 90.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while RITES.BO trades at ₹188.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check RITES.BO's competition here
KEC International Limited (NSE: KEC.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs KEC.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while KEC.NS trades at ₹329.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check KEC.NS's competition here
KEC International Limited (BSE: KEC.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs KEC.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 87.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while KEC.BO trades at ₹329.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check KEC.BO's competition here
Kalpataru Power Transmission Limited (NSE: KALPATPOWR.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs KALPATPOWR.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here
Welspun Enterprises Limited (BSE: WELENT.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs WELENT.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹620.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check WELENT.BO's competition here
Welspun Enterprises Limited (NSE: WELENT.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs WELENT.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 84B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹619.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check WELENT.NS's competition here
Axiscades Technologies Limited (NSE: AXISCADES.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs AXISCADES.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹1,875.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 220.43. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here
Axiscades Technologies Limited (BSE: AXISCADES.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs AXISCADES.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹1,876.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 220.46. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. (NSE: AFCONS.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs AFCONS.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹206.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 53.24. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here
G R Infraprojects Limited (BSE: GRINFRA.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs GRINFRA.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹755.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here
G R Infraprojects Limited (NSE: GRINFRA.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs GRINFRA.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹754.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here
GMR Power and Urban Infra Limited (NSE: GMRP&UI.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs GMRP&UI.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GMRP&UI.NS has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while GMRP&UI.NS trades at ₹92.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GMRP&UI.NS's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GMRP&UI.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to GMRP&UI.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check GMRP&UI.NS's competition here
NCC Limited (NSE: NCC.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs NCC.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while NCC.NS trades at ₹114.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check NCC.NS's competition here
NCC Limited (BSE: NCC.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs NCC.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while NCC.BO trades at ₹114.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check NCC.BO's competition here
Power Mech Projects Limited (NSE: POWERMECH.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs POWERMECH.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹2,163.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here
Power Mech Projects Limited (BSE: POWERMECH.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs POWERMECH.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹2,163.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here
Ceigall India Ltd. (NSE: CEIGALL.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs CEIGALL.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CEIGALL.NS has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while CEIGALL.NS trades at ₹390.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CEIGALL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CEIGALL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to CEIGALL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check CEIGALL.NS's competition here
Isgec Heavy Engineering Limited (BSE: ISGEC.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs ISGEC.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹919.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here
Isgec Heavy Engineering Limited (NSE: ISGEC.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs ISGEC.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ISGEC.NS has a market cap of 67.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while ISGEC.NS trades at ₹919.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ISGEC.NS's P/E ratio is 34.51. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ISGEC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to ISGEC.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check ISGEC.NS's competition here
Dilip Buildcon Limited (NSE: DBL.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs DBL.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while DBL.NS trades at ₹375.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check DBL.NS's competition here
Dilip Buildcon Limited (BSE: DBL.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs DBL.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while DBL.BO trades at ₹375.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check DBL.BO's competition here
Transrail Lighting Limited (BSE: TRANSRAILL.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs TRANSRAILL.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹425.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here
Transrail Lighting Limited (NSE: TRANSRAILL.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs TRANSRAILL.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹423.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here
Hindustan Construction Company Limited (NSE: HCC.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs HCC.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HCC.NS has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while HCC.NS trades at ₹17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas HCC.NS's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HCC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to HCC.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check HCC.NS's competition here
Praj Industries Limited (NSE: PRAJIND.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs PRAJIND.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹241.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 84.81. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here
Praj Industries Limited (BSE: PRAJIND.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs PRAJIND.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹241.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 84.68. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here
Man Infraconstruction Limited (NSE: MANINFRA.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs MANINFRA.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹106.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here
Man Infraconstruction Limited (BSE: MANINFRA.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs MANINFRA.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹106.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here
GE Power India Limited (BSE: GVPIL.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs GVPIL.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹566.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is similarly volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here
GE Power India Limited (NSE: GVPIL.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs GVPIL.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹566.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here
Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Limited (NSE: AHLUCONT.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs AHLUCONT.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹527.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here
Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Limited (BSE: AHLUCONT.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs AHLUCONT.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹527.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here
Hindustan Construction Company Limited (BSE: HCC.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs HCC.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while HCC.BO trades at ₹17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check HCC.BO's competition here
Vindhya Telelinks Limited (NSE: VINDHYATEL.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs VINDHYATEL.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.NS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while VINDHYATEL.NS trades at ₹2,703.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas VINDHYATEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VINDHYATEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check VINDHYATEL.NS's competition here
Vindhya Telelinks Limited (BSE: VINDHYATEL.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs VINDHYATEL.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.BO has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while VINDHYATEL.BO trades at ₹2,699.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas VINDHYATEL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VINDHYATEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check VINDHYATEL.BO's competition here
PNC Infratech Limited (NSE: PNCINFRA.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs PNCINFRA.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹123.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here
PNC Infratech Limited (BSE: PNCINFRA.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs PNCINFRA.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹124.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here
J. Kumar Infraprojects Limited (NSE: JKIL.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs JKIL.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹405.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check JKIL.NS's competition here
J. Kumar Infraprojects Limited (BSE: JKIL.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs JKIL.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹404.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to JKIL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check JKIL.BO's competition here
Bondada Engineering Limited (BSE: BONDADA.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs BONDADA.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹272.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here
Enviro Infra Engineers Ltd. (NSE: EIEL.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs EIEL.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹160.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check EIEL.NS's competition here
KNR Constructions Limited (NSE: KNRCON.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs KNRCON.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹98.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here
KNR Constructions Limited (BSE: KNRCON.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs KNRCON.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹98.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here
PSP Projects Limited (BSE: PSPPROJECT.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs PSPPROJECT.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹695.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here
PSP Projects Limited (NSE: PSPPROJECT.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs PSPPROJECT.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹691.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 39.72. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here
Ashoka Buildcon Limited (NSE: ASHOKA.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs ASHOKA.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹96.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here
Ashoka Buildcon Limited (BSE: ASHOKA.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs ASHOKA.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹96.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here
H.G. Infra Engineering Limited (BSE: HGINFRA.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs HGINFRA.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹378.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here
H.G. Infra Engineering Limited (NSE: HGINFRA.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs HGINFRA.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹379.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here
Interarch Building Products Ltd. (NSE: INTERARCH.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs INTERARCH.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹1,460.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here
GE Power India Limited (BSE: GEPIL.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs GEPIL.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here
GE Power India Limited (NSE: GEPIL.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs GEPIL.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here
Oriana Power Ltd. (NSE: ORIANA.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs ORIANA.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ORIANA.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while ORIANA.NS trades at ₹230.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ORIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ORIANA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to ORIANA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check ORIANA.NS's competition here
Patel Engineering Limited (NSE: PATELENG.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs PATELENG.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here
Patel Engineering Limited (BSE: PATELENG.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs PATELENG.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here
Ramky Infrastructure Limited (NSE: RAMKY.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs RAMKY.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹307.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here
Ramky Infrastructure Limited (BSE: RAMKY.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs RAMKY.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹307.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here
BGR Energy Systems Limited (BSE: BGRENERGY.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs BGRENERGY.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹282.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here
BGR Energy Systems Limited (NSE: BGRENERGY.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs BGRENERGY.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹281.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here
Simplex Infrastructures Limited (NSE: SIMPLEXINF.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs SIMPLEXINF.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹253.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 43.35. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here
Simplex Infrastructures Limited (BSE: SIMPLEXINF.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs SIMPLEXINF.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹253.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 48.71. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here
JMC Projects (India) Limited (NSE: JMCPROJECT.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs JMCPROJECT.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here
Bajel Projects Limited (NSE: BAJEL.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs BAJEL.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BAJEL.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while BAJEL.NS trades at ₹160.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BAJEL.NS's P/E ratio is 1718.38. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BAJEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to BAJEL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check BAJEL.NS's competition here
Bajel Projects Limited (BSE: BAJEL.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs BAJEL.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BAJEL.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while BAJEL.BO trades at ₹160.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BAJEL.BO's P/E ratio is 1714.74. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BAJEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to BAJEL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check BAJEL.BO's competition here
BF Utilities Limited (NSE: BFUTILITIE.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs BFUTILITIE.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BFUTILITIE.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while BFUTILITIE.NS trades at ₹427.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BFUTILITIE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to BFUTILITIE.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check BFUTILITIE.NS's competition here
BF Utilities Limited (BSE: BFUTILITIE.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs BFUTILITIE.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BFUTILITIE.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while BFUTILITIE.BO trades at ₹424.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BFUTILITIE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to BFUTILITIE.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check BFUTILITIE.BO's competition here
EMS Limited (BSE: EMSLIMITED.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs EMSLIMITED.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹280.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here
The Indian Hume Pipe Company Limited (BSE: INDIANHUME.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs INDIANHUME.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here
The Indian Hume Pipe Company Limited (NSE: INDIANHUME.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs INDIANHUME.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹296.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here
EMS Limited (NSE: EMSLIMITED.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs EMSLIMITED.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹280.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here
M & B Engineering Limited (BSE: MBEL.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs MBEL.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MBEL.BO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while MBEL.BO trades at ₹262.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MBEL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MBEL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to MBEL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check MBEL.BO's competition here
M & B Engineering Limited (NSE: MBEL.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs MBEL.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹262.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check MBEL.NS's competition here
GPT Infraprojects Limited (NSE: GPTINFRA.NS)
GARUDA.BO vs GPTINFRA.NS Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GPTINFRA.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while GPTINFRA.NS trades at ₹112.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GPTINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GPTINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check GPTINFRA.NS's competition here
GPT Infraprojects Limited (BSE: GPTINFRA.BO)
GARUDA.BO vs GPTINFRA.BO Comparison November 2026
Garuda Construction and Engineering Limited (BSE: GARUDA.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARUDA.BO stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GPTINFRA.BO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARUDA.BO is priced at ₹136.55 on the BSE, while GPTINFRA.BO trades at ₹112.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARUDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GPTINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, GARUDA.BO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GPTINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GARUDA.BO is more volatile compared to GPTINFRA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARUDA.BO.Check GPTINFRA.BO's competition here