BF Utilities Limited
BF Utilities Limited (BFUTILITIE.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BFUTILITIE.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFUTILITIE.NS | ₹599.15 | +5.35% | 21.5B | 13.60 | ₹41.97 | N/A |
| ADANIGREEN.NS | ₹1,435.00 | -2.74% | 2.4T | 150.88 | ₹9.59 | N/A |
| ADANIGREEN.BO | ₹1,439.30 | -2.43% | 2.4T | 150.88 | ₹9.59 | N/A |
| ENRIN.NS | ₹3,615.00 | -6.64% | 1.3T | 101.07 | ₹36.78 | +0.11% |
| NTPCGREEN.NS | ₹101.31 | -2.13% | 839.3B | 160.66 | ₹0.62 | N/A |
| NHPC.NS | ₹72.52 | -8.05% | 775.5B | 27.87 | ₹2.77 | +2.47% |
| NHPC.BO | ₹72.94 | -7.46% | 775.4B | 27.87 | ₹2.77 | +2.47% |
| SUZLON.NS | ₹53.41 | -6.28% | 739.7B | 23.35 | ₹2.31 | N/A |
| SUZLON.BO | ₹53.65 | -6.17% | 739.1B | 23.33 | ₹2.31 | N/A |
| SJVN.NS | ₹71.93 | -4.30% | 286.5B | 44.73 | ₹1.63 | +2.00% |
Stock Comparison
BFUTILITIE.NS vs ADANIGREEN.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, ADANIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while ADANIGREEN.NS trades at ₹1,435.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas ADANIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 150.88. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ADANIGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to ADANIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check ADANIGREEN.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs ADANIGREEN.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, ADANIGREEN.BO has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while ADANIGREEN.BO trades at ₹1,439.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas ADANIGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 150.88. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ADANIGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to ADANIGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check ADANIGREEN.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs ENRIN.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, ENRIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while ENRIN.NS trades at ₹3,615.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas ENRIN.NS's P/E ratio is 101.07. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ENRIN.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to ENRIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check ENRIN.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs NTPCGREEN.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, NTPCGREEN.NS has a market cap of 839.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while NTPCGREEN.NS trades at ₹101.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas NTPCGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 160.66. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to NTPCGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check NTPCGREEN.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs NHPC.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, NHPC.NS has a market cap of 775.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while NHPC.NS trades at ₹72.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas NHPC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NHPC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to NHPC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check NHPC.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs NHPC.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, NHPC.BO has a market cap of 775.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while NHPC.BO trades at ₹72.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas NHPC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NHPC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to NHPC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check NHPC.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs SUZLON.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, SUZLON.NS has a market cap of 739.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while SUZLON.NS trades at ₹53.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas SUZLON.NS's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SUZLON.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to SUZLON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check SUZLON.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs SUZLON.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, SUZLON.BO has a market cap of 739.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while SUZLON.BO trades at ₹53.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas SUZLON.BO's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SUZLON.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to SUZLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check SUZLON.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs SJVN.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, SJVN.NS has a market cap of 286.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while SJVN.NS trades at ₹71.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas SJVN.NS's P/E ratio is 44.73. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SJVN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to SJVN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check SJVN.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs SJVN.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, SJVN.BO has a market cap of 286.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while SJVN.BO trades at ₹72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas SJVN.BO's P/E ratio is 44.71. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SJVN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to SJVN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check SJVN.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs ACMESOLAR.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, ACMESOLAR.NS has a market cap of 186.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while ACMESOLAR.NS trades at ₹333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas ACMESOLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ACMESOLAR.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is less volatile compared to ACMESOLAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check ACMESOLAR.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs ACMESOLAR.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, ACMESOLAR.BO has a market cap of 186B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while ACMESOLAR.BO trades at ₹333.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas ACMESOLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is less volatile compared to ACMESOLAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check ACMESOLAR.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs INOXWIND.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, INOXWIND.NS has a market cap of 144.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while INOXWIND.NS trades at ₹83.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas INOXWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INOXWIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to INOXWIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check INOXWIND.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs INOXWIND.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, INOXWIND.BO has a market cap of 144.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while INOXWIND.BO trades at ₹84.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas INOXWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INOXWIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to INOXWIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check INOXWIND.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs IWEL.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, IWEL.BO has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while IWEL.BO trades at ₹10,301.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas IWEL.BO's P/E ratio is 89.28. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IWEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to IWEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check IWEL.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs IWEL.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, IWEL.NS has a market cap of 124B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while IWEL.NS trades at ₹10,293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas IWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 89.29. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IWEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to IWEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check IWEL.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs WAAREERTL.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, WAAREERTL.NS has a market cap of 101.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while WAAREERTL.NS trades at ₹977.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas WAAREERTL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WAAREERTL.NS's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to WAAREERTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check WAAREERTL.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs KPIGREEN.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, KPIGREEN.BO has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while KPIGREEN.BO trades at ₹420.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas KPIGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KPIGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to KPIGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check KPIGREEN.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs KPIGREEN.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, KPIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while KPIGREEN.NS trades at ₹418.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas KPIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KPIGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to KPIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check KPIGREEN.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs INOXGREEN.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, INOXGREEN.NS has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while INOXGREEN.NS trades at ₹173.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas INOXGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 61.36. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INOXGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is less volatile compared to INOXGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check INOXGREEN.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs INOXGREEN.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, INOXGREEN.BO has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while INOXGREEN.BO trades at ₹174.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas INOXGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 61.29. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INOXGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is less volatile compared to INOXGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check INOXGREEN.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs RTNPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, RTNPOWER.BO has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while RTNPOWER.BO trades at ₹9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas RTNPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 95.10. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RTNPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to RTNPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check RTNPOWER.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs RTNPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, RTNPOWER.NS has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while RTNPOWER.NS trades at ₹9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas RTNPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RTNPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to RTNPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check RTNPOWER.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs BFUTILITIE.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, BFUTILITIE.BO has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while BFUTILITIE.BO trades at ₹600.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas BFUTILITIE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to BFUTILITIE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check BFUTILITIE.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs INDOWIND.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, INDOWIND.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while INDOWIND.NS trades at ₹9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas INDOWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 106.89. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INDOWIND.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to INDOWIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check INDOWIND.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs INDOWIND.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, INDOWIND.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while INDOWIND.BO trades at ₹9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas INDOWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 105.67. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INDOWIND.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to INDOWIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check INDOWIND.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs KARMAENG.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, KARMAENG.BO has a market cap of 547.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while KARMAENG.BO trades at ₹44.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas KARMAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KARMAENG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to KARMAENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check KARMAENG.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs KARMAENG.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, KARMAENG.NS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while KARMAENG.NS trades at ₹44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas KARMAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KARMAENG.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to KARMAENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check KARMAENG.NS's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs SMEL.BO Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, SMEL.BO has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while SMEL.BO trades at ₹8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas SMEL.BO's P/E ratio is 437.50. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SMEL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to SMEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check SMEL.BO's competition here
BFUTILITIE.NS vs KPIGLOBAL.NS Comparison June 2026
BFUTILITIE.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFUTILITIE.NS stands at 21.5B. In comparison, KPIGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFUTILITIE.NS is priced at ₹599.15, while KPIGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹541.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFUTILITIE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.60, whereas KPIGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BFUTILITIE.NS is more volatile compared to KPIGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFUTILITIE.NS.Check KPIGLOBAL.NS's competition here