Lakeside Holding Limited
Lakeside Holding Limited (LSH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LSH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSH | $0.82 | +0.00% | 8.6M | -1.41 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| UPS | $84.50 | -1.93% | 71.6B | 12.58 | $6.72 | +7.74% |
| FDX | $217.10 | -2.86% | 51.2B | 12.91 | $16.81 | +2.58% |
| ZTO | $20.23 | +2.74% | 15.9B | 12.73 | $1.59 | +3.45% |
| EXPD | $114.65 | -1.36% | 15.7B | 19.01 | $6.03 | +1.31% |
| XPO | $118.79 | -1.25% | 14B | 41.08 | $2.89 | N/A |
| CHRW | $113.86 | -1.27% | 13.5B | 25.82 | $4.41 | +2.17% |
| JBHT | $139.56 | -3.12% | 13.5B | 25.37 | $5.50 | +1.24% |
| GXO | $48.07 | -3.30% | 5.5B | 77.47 | $0.62 | N/A |
| LSTR | $128.37 | -3.75% | 4.4B | 26.91 | $4.77 | +2.70% |
Stock Comparison
LSH vs UPS Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while UPS trades at $84.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check UPS's competition here
LSH vs FDX Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while FDX trades at $217.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check FDX's competition here
LSH vs ZTO Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while ZTO trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check ZTO's competition here
LSH vs EXPD Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while EXPD trades at $114.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check EXPD's competition here
LSH vs XPO Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while XPO trades at $118.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 41.08. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check XPO's competition here
LSH vs CHRW Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while CHRW trades at $113.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check CHRW's competition here
LSH vs JBHT Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while JBHT trades at $139.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check JBHT's competition here
LSH vs GXO Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while GXO trades at $48.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 77.47. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check GXO's competition here
LSH vs LSTR Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while LSTR trades at $128.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check LSTR's competition here
LSH vs PBI Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while PBI trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to PBI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check PBI's competition here
LSH vs HUBG Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while HUBG trades at $33.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check HUBG's competition here
LSH vs FWRD Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 888.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while FWRD trades at $29.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check FWRD's competition here
LSH vs AIRTP Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 439.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while AIRTP trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 54.34. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check AIRTP's competition here
LSH vs CYRX Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 364.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while CYRX trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to CYRX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check CYRX's competition here
LSH vs RLGT Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 276.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while RLGT trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check RLGT's competition here
LSH vs PAL Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 178.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while PAL trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -94.00. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check PAL's competition here
LSH vs CRGO Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while CRGO trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check CRGO's competition here
LSH vs SINO Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check SINO's competition here
LSH vs SFWL Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while SFWL trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check SFWL's competition here
LSH vs FLX Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while FLX trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check FLX's competition here
LSH vs BTOC Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while BTOC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check BTOC's competition here
LSH vs AIRT Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while AIRT trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to AIRT's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check AIRT's competition here
LSH vs JYD Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while JYD trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to JYD's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check JYD's competition here
LSH vs CJMB Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while CJMB trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check CJMB's competition here
LSH vs NCEW Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while NCEW trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is 68.98. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to NCEW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check NCEW's competition here
LSH vs HKPD Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, HKPD has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while HKPD trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas HKPD's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to HKPD's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to HKPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check HKPD's competition here
LSH vs CRGOW Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while CRGOW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check CRGOW's competition here
LSH vs PSIG Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while PSIG trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check PSIG's competition here
LSH vs GVH Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while GVH trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check GVH's competition here
LSH vs SGLY Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while SGLY trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check SGLY's competition here
LSH vs ATXG Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while ATXG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check ATXG's competition here
LSH vs AIRTW Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check AIRTW's competition here
LSH vs ECHO Comparison August 2025
LSH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSH stands at 8.6M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSH is priced at $0.82, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSH currently has a P/E ratio of -1.41, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSH's ROE is -2.70%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LSH is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSH.Check ECHO's competition here