Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LFT-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFT-PA | $20.40 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 90.63 | $0.23 | +16.86% |
| RCB | $24.70 | +0.00% | 60B | 15.64 | $1.59 | +6.26% |
| NLY | $22.98 | +0.00% | 16.5B | 7.88 | $2.92 | +12.19% |
| NLY-PI | $25.75 | +0.00% | 16.5B | 14.56 | $1.77 | +12.19% |
| NLY-PG | $25.36 | +0.00% | 13.8B | 14.36 | $1.77 | +12.19% |
| RITM-PA | $25.56 | +0.00% | 13.7B | 17.47 | $1.46 | +9.54% |
| RITM-PB | $25.35 | -0.02% | 13.6B | N/A | N/A | +9.54% |
| NLY-PF | $25.94 | +0.00% | 13.5B | 14.69 | $1.77 | +12.19% |
| RITM-PD | $24.90 | +0.00% | 13.4B | N/A | N/A | +9.54% |
| RITM-PC | $24.65 | +0.00% | 13.2B | N/A | N/A | +9.54% |
Stock Comparison
LFT-PA vs RCB Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RCB trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RCB's competition here
LFT-PA vs NLY Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NLY trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NLY's competition here
LFT-PA vs NLY-PI Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NLY-PI trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NLY-PI's competition here
LFT-PA vs NLY-PG Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NLY-PG trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NLY-PG's competition here
LFT-PA vs RITM-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RITM-PA trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RITM-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs RITM-PB Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RITM-PB trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RITM-PB's competition here
LFT-PA vs NLY-PF Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NLY-PF trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NLY-PF's competition here
LFT-PA vs RITM-PD Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RITM-PD trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RITM-PD's competition here
LFT-PA vs RITM-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RITM-PC trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RITM-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs AGNC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while AGNC trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check AGNC's competition here
LFT-PA vs AGNCO Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while AGNCO trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.70. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check AGNCO's competition here
LFT-PA vs AGNCP Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while AGNCP trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check AGNCP's competition here
LFT-PA vs AGNCL Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while AGNCL trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check AGNCL's competition here
LFT-PA vs AGNCM Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while AGNCM trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.43. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check AGNCM's competition here
LFT-PA vs AGNCN Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while AGNCN trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check AGNCN's competition here
LFT-PA vs STWD Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while STWD trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check STWD's competition here
LFT-PA vs RITM Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RITM trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RITM's competition here
LFT-PA vs NRZ Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NRZ's competition here
LFT-PA vs EFC-PE Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check EFC-PE's competition here
LFT-PA vs ABR-PF Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ABR-PF trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ABR-PF's competition here
LFT-PA vs RCD Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RCD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RCD trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RCD's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RCD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to RCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RCD's competition here
LFT-PA vs ABR-PD Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ABR-PD trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ABR-PD's competition here
LFT-PA vs ABR-PE Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ABR-PE trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ABR-PE's competition here
LFT-PA vs BXMT Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while BXMT trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BXMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check BXMT's competition here
LFT-PA vs RWT-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RWT-PA trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RWT-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs RWTN Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RWTN trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RWTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RWTN's competition here
LFT-PA vs TWO-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while TWO-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check TWO-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs MFAO Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while MFAO trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check MFAO's competition here
LFT-PA vs TWO-PB Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while TWO-PB trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 44.97. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check TWO-PB's competition here
LFT-PA vs TWO-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while TWO-PA trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is 45.05. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check TWO-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs MFAN Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while MFAN trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check MFAN's competition here
LFT-PA vs EFC-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while EFC-PA trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check EFC-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs EFC-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while EFC-PC trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check EFC-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs EFC-PB Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while EFC-PB trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check EFC-PB's competition here
LFT-PA vs MFA-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while MFA-PC trades at $23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check MFA-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs EFC-PD Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while EFC-PD trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check EFC-PD's competition here
LFT-PA vs NYMTH Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NYMTH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NYMTH trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NYMTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NYMTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NYMTH's competition here
LFT-PA vs NYMTM Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NYMTM trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 531.49. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NYMTM's competition here
LFT-PA vs MFA-PB Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while MFA-PB trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check MFA-PB's competition here
LFT-PA vs DX Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while DX trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check DX's competition here
LFT-PA vs ARR Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ARR trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is 94.26. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ARR's competition here
LFT-PA vs RC-PE Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RC-PE trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RC-PE's competition here
LFT-PA vs RC-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RC-PC trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RC-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs FBRT-PE Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while FBRT-PE trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -12.66. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check FBRT-PE's competition here
LFT-PA vs PMT-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while PMT-PC trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -26.63. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check PMT-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs IVR-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while IVR-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check IVR-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs DX-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while DX-PC trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check DX-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs ARI Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ARI trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ARI's competition here
LFT-PA vs ABR Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ABR trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ABR's competition here
LFT-PA vs TRTX-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while TRTX-PC trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check TRTX-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs ARR-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ARR-PC trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ARR-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs LADR Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while LADR trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check LADR's competition here
LFT-PA vs NYMTO Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NYMTO's competition here
LFT-PA vs KREF-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while KREF-PA trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check KREF-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs EFC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while EFC trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check EFC's competition here
LFT-PA vs SCCC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while SCCC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check SCCC's competition here
LFT-PA vs ORC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ORC trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ORC's competition here
LFT-PA vs TWO Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while TWO trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TWO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check TWO's competition here
LFT-PA vs CIM Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while CIM trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is -34.71. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check CIM's competition here
LFT-PA vs SCCG Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SCCG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while SCCG trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas SCCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCCG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to SCCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check SCCG's competition here
LFT-PA vs CIM-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while CIM-PA trades at $22.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check CIM-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs CIM-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while CIM-PC trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check CIM-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs CIM-PD Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while CIM-PD trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check CIM-PD's competition here
LFT-PA vs CIM-PB Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while CIM-PB trades at $24.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check CIM-PB's competition here
LFT-PA vs PMT-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while PMT-PA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -33.34. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check PMT-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs PMT Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while PMT trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check PMT's competition here
LFT-PA vs PMT-PB Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while PMT-PB trades at $24.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -33.04. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check PMT-PB's competition here
LFT-PA vs MFA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while MFA trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check MFA's competition here
LFT-PA vs GPMT-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 971.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while GPMT-PA trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check GPMT-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs SACH-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 865.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while SACH-PA trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 42.69. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check SACH-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs MITP Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MITP has a market cap of 808.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while MITP trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas MITP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MITP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to MITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check MITP's competition here
LFT-PA vs MITN Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 804.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while MITN trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check MITN's competition here
LFT-PA vs MITT-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 785.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while MITT-PC trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check MITT-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs RWT Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 781M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RWT trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RWT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RWT's competition here
LFT-PA vs CHMI-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CHMI-PA has a market cap of 777.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while CHMI-PA trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas CHMI-PA's P/E ratio is 38.40. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHMI-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to CHMI-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check CHMI-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs FBRT Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 743.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while FBRT trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check FBRT's competition here
LFT-PA vs ADAM Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ADAM has a market cap of 735.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ADAM trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ADAM's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to ADAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ADAM's competition here
LFT-PA vs TRTX Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 664.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while TRTX trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check TRTX's competition here
LFT-PA vs NYMT Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 642.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NYMT trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NYMT's competition here
LFT-PA vs BRMK Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check BRMK's competition here
LFT-PA vs NYMTZ Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 633.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NYMTZ trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 396.39. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NYMTZ's competition here
LFT-PA vs AIC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check AIC's competition here
LFT-PA vs IVR Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 614.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while IVR trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check IVR's competition here
LFT-PA vs NYMTN Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NYMTN trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 460.96. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NYMTN's competition here
LFT-PA vs NYMTL Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 611.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NYMTL trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 464.26. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NYMTL's competition here
LFT-PA vs KREF Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while KREF trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KREF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check KREF's competition here
LFT-PA vs NREF-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 437.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NREF-PA trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NREF-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs CMTG Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 330.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while CMTG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check CMTG's competition here
LFT-PA vs RC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while RC trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check RC's competition here
LFT-PA vs ACRE Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 282.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ACRE trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -255.25. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ACRE's competition here
LFT-PA vs NREF Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while NREF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check NREF's competition here
LFT-PA vs MITT Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while MITT trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check MITT's competition here
LFT-PA vs REFI Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, REFI has a market cap of 251.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while REFI trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas REFI's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REFI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to REFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check REFI's competition here
LFT-PA vs MITT-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MITT-PA has a market cap of 247.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while MITT-PA trades at $23.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas MITT-PA's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MITT-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to MITT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check MITT-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs MITT-PB Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MITT-PB has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while MITT-PB trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas MITT-PB's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MITT-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to MITT-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check MITT-PB's competition here
LFT-PA vs AOMR Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AOMR has a market cap of 214.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while AOMR trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas AOMR's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AOMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to AOMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check AOMR's competition here
LFT-PA vs ICR-PA Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ICR-PA has a market cap of 186.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ICR-PA trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ICR-PA's P/E ratio is 31.89. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ICR-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is more volatile compared to ICR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ICR-PA's competition here
LFT-PA vs ACR-PC Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ACR-PC has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ACR-PC trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ACR-PC's P/E ratio is 49.74. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACR-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to ACR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ACR-PC's competition here
LFT-PA vs ACR-PD Comparison February 2026
LFT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFT-PA stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ACR-PD has a market cap of 154M. Regarding current trading prices, LFT-PA is priced at $20.40, while ACR-PD trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 90.63, whereas ACR-PD's P/E ratio is 43.67. In terms of profitability, LFT-PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACR-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFT-PA is less volatile compared to ACR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFT-PA.Check ACR-PD's competition here