Ladder Capital Corp
Ladder Capital Corp LADR Peers
See (LADR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LADR | $10.67 | +2.40% | 1.37B | 13.01 | $0.82 | +8.59% |
| RITM-PA | $25.15 | +0.04% | 13.33B | 17.23 | $1.46 | +8.68% |
| RITM-PB | $25.08 | +0.27% | 13.30B | N/A | N/A | +8.68% |
| RITM-PC | $24.53 | +0.54% | 13.00B | N/A | N/A | +8.68% |
| RITM-PD | $23.92 | +0.91% | 12.68B | N/A | N/A | +8.68% |
| NLY | $19.49 | +1.36% | 11.79B | 21.19 | $0.92 | +13.55% |
| NLY-PF | $25.63 | +0.17% | 11.66B | 14.50 | $1.77 | +13.55% |
| NLY-PI | $25.56 | -0.20% | 11.61B | 14.46 | $1.77 | +13.55% |
| NLY-PG | $24.75 | -0.21% | 11.61B | 14.00 | $1.77 | +13.55% |
| AGNC | $9.00 | +2.39% | 9.18B | 25.00 | $0.36 | +16.04% |
Stock Comparison
LADR vs RITM-PA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while RITM-PA trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs RITM-PB Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while RITM-PB trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs RITM-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.00B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while RITM-PC trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs RITM-PD Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while RITM-PD trades at $23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NLY Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 11.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NLY trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NLY-PF Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 11.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NLY-PF trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NLY-PI Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 11.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NLY-PI trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NLY-PG Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 11.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NLY-PG trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs AGNC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while AGNC trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs AGNCO Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while AGNCO trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs AGNCM Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 9.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while AGNCM trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.35. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs AGNCP Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 8.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while AGNCP trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.43. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs AGNCN Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 8.97B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while AGNCN trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.79. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs AGNCL Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while AGNCL trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs STWD Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 6.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while STWD trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs RITM Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while RITM trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NRZ Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs EFC-PE Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs ABR-PF Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while ABR-PF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs ABR-PD Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while ABR-PD trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs BXMT Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while BXMT trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is -42.73. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BXMT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs RWT-PA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while RWT-PA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs ABR-PE Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while ABR-PE trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs RWTN Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while RWTN trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RWTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR and RWTN have similar daily volatility (2.84).
LADR vs RC-PE Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while RC-PE trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs RC-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while RC-PC trades at $14.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs MFA-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while MFA-PC trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NYMTM Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NYMTM trades at $24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 525.11. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs EFC-PB Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while EFC-PB trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs EFC-PD Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while EFC-PD trades at $23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs ABR Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while ABR trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NYMTL Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NYMTL trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 464.26. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs FBRT-PE Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while FBRT-PE trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NYMTZ Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NYMTZ trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 389.10. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs PMT-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while PMT-PC trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -25.85. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is less volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs TRTX-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while TRTX-PC trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs ARR Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while ARR trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is -39.44. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs ARR-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while ARR-PC trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -13.41. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs ARI Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while ARI trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is -196.00. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs DX Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while DX trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs DX-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while DX-PC trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NYMTO Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs KREF-PA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while KREF-PA trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs TWO Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while TWO trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -36.33. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs EFC-PA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while EFC-PA trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs TWO-PB Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while TWO-PB trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs EFC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while EFC trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs TWO-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while TWO-PC trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs EFC-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while EFC-PC trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs TWO-PA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while TWO-PA trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is 42.47. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs SCCC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while SCCC trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs LFT-PA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while LFT-PA trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is 95.63. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs PMT Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while PMT trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs PMT-PA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while PMT-PA trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -33.05. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs PMT-PB Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while PMT-PB trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -33.54. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs CIM Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while CIM trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs CIM-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while CIM-PC trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.10. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs CIM-PD Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while CIM-PD trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs CIM-PB Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while CIM-PB trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs CIM-PA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while CIM-PA trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs MFA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 986.50M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while MFA trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs MFAO Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 972.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while MFAO trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs MFAN Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 972.59M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while MFAN trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs MFA-PB Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 970.97M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while MFA-PB trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs FBRT Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 959.32M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while FBRT trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs GPMT-PA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 862.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while GPMT-PA trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs RWT Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 789.92M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while RWT trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RWT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs ORC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 770.15M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while ORC trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR and ORC have similar daily volatility (2.84).
LADR vs MITT-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 745.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while MITT-PC trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs SACH-PA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 735.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while SACH-PA trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is less volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs RC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 733.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while RC trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs RCB Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 711.84M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while RCB trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs KREF Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 647.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while KREF trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is 56.18. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs BRMK Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635.03M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs AIC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs TRTX Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 629.68M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while TRTX trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NYMT Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 608.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NYMT trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is -112.33. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NYMTN Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 591.90M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NYMTN trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 470.24. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs IVR-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 497.81M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while IVR-PC trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs IVR Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 497.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while IVR trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NREF-PA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 383.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NREF-PA trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is less volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs CMTG Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 361.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while CMTG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs REFI Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, REFI has a market cap of 314.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while REFI trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas REFI's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to REFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs ACRE Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 271.73M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while ACRE trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -20.58. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is less volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs NREF Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 261.48M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while NREF trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is less volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs AOMR Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, AOMR has a market cap of 238.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while AOMR trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AOMR's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AOMR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to AOMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs EARN Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, EARN has a market cap of 206.39M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while EARN trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas EARN's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EARN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to EARN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs MITT Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 205.06M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while MITT trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs MITT-PA Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, MITT-PA has a market cap of 203.34M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while MITT-PA trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MITT-PA's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MITT-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to MITT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs MITN Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 202.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while MITN trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs MITT-PB Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, MITT-PB has a market cap of 202.23M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while MITT-PB trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MITT-PB's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MITT-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to MITT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs ACR-PC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, ACR-PC has a market cap of 183.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while ACR-PC trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ACR-PC's P/E ratio is 49.01. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACR-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to ACR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs SEVN Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, SEVN has a market cap of 173.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while SEVN trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SEVN's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to SEVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs ACR-PD Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, ACR-PD has a market cap of 154.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while ACR-PD trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ACR-PD's P/E ratio is 41.34. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACR-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to ACR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs ACR Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, ACR has a market cap of 137.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while ACR trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ACR's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to ACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs LFT Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, LFT has a market cap of 137.35M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while LFT trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas LFT's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to LFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs AJX Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, AJX has a market cap of 137.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while AJX trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AJX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AJX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to AJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs AAIC Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, AAIC has a market cap of 137.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while AAIC trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AAIC's P/E ratio is -60.50. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAIC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is less volatile compared to AAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.
LADR vs AAIC-PB Comparison
LADR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LADR stands at 1.37B. In comparison, AAIC-PB has a market cap of 137.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LADR is priced at $10.67, while AAIC-PB trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LADR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AAIC-PB's P/E ratio is -69.28. In terms of profitability, LADR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAIC-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LADR is more volatile compared to AAIC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LADR.