Kinder Morgan, Inc.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.25B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 108.88B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while EP-PC trades at $49.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, EBBNF has a market cap of 103.36B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while EBBNF trades at $22.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas EBBNF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBBNF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to EBBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ENBRF has a market cap of 103.08B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ENBRF trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ENBRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENBRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to ENBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ENNPF has a market cap of 102.36B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ENNPF trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ENNPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENNPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to ENNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, EBRGF has a market cap of 102.03B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while EBRGF trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas EBRGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBRGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to EBRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ENBGF has a market cap of 101.76B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ENBGF trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ENBGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENBGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to ENBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 101.53B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ENB trades at $46.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 73.46B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while WMB trades at $60.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 64.96B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while EPD trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 55.58B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ET trades at $16.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 52.88B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TRP trades at $50.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TCANF has a market cap of 52.88B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TCANF trades at $6.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TCANF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCANF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 52.68B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while LNG trades at $236.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TNCAF has a market cap of 52.14B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TNCAF trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TNCAF's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNCAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TNCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 51.78B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while MPLX trades at $50.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, EBGEF has a market cap of 51.01B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while EBGEF trades at $23.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas EBGEF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to EBGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, EBBGF has a market cap of 50.75B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while EBBGF trades at $23.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas EBBGF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBBGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to EBBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 50.06B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while OKE trades at $80.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.78B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ENBA trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 39.61B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ET-PI trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 34.43B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TRGP trades at $158.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 34.13B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 28.90B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while CQP trades at $59.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CQP's ROE of -18.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, EBRZF has a market cap of 27.89B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while EBRZF trades at $12.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas EBRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBRZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to EBRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, PMMBF has a market cap of 22.67B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while PMMBF trades at $16.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas PMMBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMMBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to PMMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 22.64B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while PBA trades at $39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 20.67B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while VG trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, PMBPF has a market cap of 20.27B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while PMBPF trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas PMBPF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMBPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to PMBPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, SOCGM has a market cap of 15.98B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while SOCGM trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SOCGM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOCGM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to SOCGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while MMP trades at $69.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 13.67B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while WES trades at $35.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 11.38B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while PAA trades at $16.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 10.33B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while DTM trades at $101.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, PPLAF has a market cap of 10.02B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while PPLAF trades at $17.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas PPLAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPLAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to PPLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 9.08B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while VNOM trades at $41.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, PBNAF has a market cap of 9.03B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while PBNAF trades at $15.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas PBNAF's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PBNAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to PBNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.70B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while DCP trades at $41.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while AM trades at $17.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while HESM trades at $36.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, KEYUF has a market cap of 7.04B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while KEYUF trades at $30.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas KEYUF's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEYUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to KEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ENLC trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, EQTNP has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while EQTNP trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas EQTNP's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EQTNP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to EQTNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, FRVWY has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while FRVWY trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas FRVWY's P/E ratio is 47.37. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRVWY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to FRVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ETRN trades at $12.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI and ETRN have similar daily volatility (2.74).

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, VOPKF has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while VOPKF trades at $42.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas VOPKF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VOPKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to VOPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, VOPKY has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while VOPKY trades at $41.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas VOPKY's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VOPKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to VOPKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GLNG trades at $39.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 82.98. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while FRO trades at $17.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while PAGP trades at $17.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while EURN trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while CEQP trades at $28.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while NS trades at $21.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while HEP trades at $20.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TPZEF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TPZEF trades at $16.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TPZEF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPZEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TPZEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GBNXF has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GBNXF trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GBNXF's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBNXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to GBNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while KNTK trades at $40.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, SOCGP has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while SOCGP trades at $25.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SOCGP's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOCGP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to SOCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while RTLR trades at $15.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while SEAL-PB trades at $24.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while DKL trades at $38.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DKL's ROE of -4.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while STNG trades at $40.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while NSS trades at $25.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while DHT trades at $11.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while INSW trades at $36.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GLP trades at $50.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GEL trades at $13.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -11.13. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TRMD trades at $17.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TNK trades at $46.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, SPKOY has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while SPKOY trades at $24.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SPKOY's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPKOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to SPKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, FDVWF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while FDVWF trades at $71.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas FDVWF's P/E ratio is 35.02. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FDVWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to FDVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while FLNG trades at $23.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.18M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, SNPKF has a market cap of 945.41M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while SNPKF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SNPKF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNPKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to SNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 937.42M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while LPG trades at $21.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 896.24M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while NVGS trades at $12.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 866.89M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GLP-PB trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 779.27M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TEN-PE trades at $26.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 655.79M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TK trades at $7.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.26M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while OSG trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.36M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TNP trades at $18.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 530.25M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TEN trades at $17.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 441.62M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while PBT trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PBT's ROE of +134.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 412.14M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.14. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 408.93M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -57.69. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 405.28M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while NGL trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.18M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while SMLP trades at $38.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMLP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 401.56M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -56.65. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 389.85M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while NGL-PB trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -9.38. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.82M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while DSSI trades at $9.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 377.61M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while NGL-PC trades at $20.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 339.08M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while SMC trades at $27.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.35M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while SNMP trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.19M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.71M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.39M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GPP trades at $12.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPP's ROE of -14.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.11M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GLOP trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 130.81M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while DLNG trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 122.74M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while DLNG-PB trades at $26.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 121.34M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 267.71. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 116.58M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while MMLP trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 108.72M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while BROG trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TWMIF has a market cap of 93.31M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TWMIF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TWMIF's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TWMIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, OGSRW has a market cap of 88.78M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while OGSRW trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas OGSRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OGSRW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to OGSRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, AVACF has a market cap of 33.51M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while AVACF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas AVACF's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVACF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to AVACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 26.41M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while BANL trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 16.19M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while PTLE trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is 59.15. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 7.82M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while MARPS trades at $3.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 5.80M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while RBNE trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TTNN has a market cap of 4.53M. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TTNN trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TTNN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTNN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to TTNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, MRGE has a market cap of 993424.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while MRGE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas MRGE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRGE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to MRGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, CWPE has a market cap of 978641.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while CWPE trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas CWPE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CWPE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to CWPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, GMLPF has a market cap of 424428.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while GMLPF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas GMLPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMLPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to GMLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61450.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while BROGW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, LOGL has a market cap of 9421.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while LOGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas LOGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to LOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, FLST has a market cap of 400.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while FLST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas FLST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLST's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to FLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TIDE has a market cap of 250.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TIDE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TIDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIDE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, SHLX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while SHLX trades at $15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas SHLX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHLX's ROE of -56.82%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to SHLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, PBFX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while PBFX trades at $19.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, BPMP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while BPMP trades at $17.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, BKEPP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while BKEPP trades at $8.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BKEPP's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKEPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to BKEPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, OMP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while OMP trades at $23.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas OMP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to OMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, TGP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while TGP trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas TGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to TGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, BKEP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while BKEP trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, HMLP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while HMLP trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas HMLP's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMLP's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is more volatile compared to HMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, HMLP-PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while HMLP-PA trades at $17.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas HMLP-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMLP-PA's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to HMLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, PSXP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while PSXP trades at $42.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas PSXP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSXP's ROE of -518.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to PSXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.

KMI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMI stands at 59.73B. In comparison, ENBL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMI is priced at $26.88, while ENBL trades at $7.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMI currently has a P/E ratio of 23.17, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMI is less volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMI.