Kingstone Companies, Inc.
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KINS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KINS | $15.54 | -1.89% | 224.9M | 7.07 | $2.25 | +0.94% |
| CB | $331.29 | +0.65% | 130.5B | 12.91 | $25.69 | +1.16% |
| PGR | $202.70 | +0.46% | 119.7B | 10.61 | $19.23 | +6.83% |
| TRV | $304.41 | +1.50% | 68B | 11.11 | $27.44 | +1.44% |
| ALL-PB | $26.24 | +0.04% | 54.8B | 2.18 | $12.04 | +1.94% |
| ALL | $205.40 | +1.07% | 54B | 5.42 | $38.05 | +1.94% |
| ALL-PH | $21.29 | -0.84% | 53.1B | 3.36 | $6.36 | +1.94% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.94% |
| WRB | $70.85 | +0.73% | 27B | 15.97 | $4.45 | +2.61% |
| MKL | $2,064.64 | -0.15% | 26.2B | 12.30 | $169.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KINS vs CB Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 130.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while CB trades at $331.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CB's competition here
KINS vs PGR Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 119.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while PGR trades at $202.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PGR's competition here
KINS vs TRV Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while TRV trades at $304.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check TRV's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PB Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while ALL-PB trades at $26.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PB's competition here
KINS vs ALL Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while ALL trades at $205.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PH Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while ALL-PH trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PH's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PG Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PG's competition here
KINS vs WRB Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while WRB trades at $70.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB's competition here
KINS vs MKL Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while MKL trades at $2,064.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MKL's competition here
KINS vs CINF Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while CINF trades at $161.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CINF's competition here
KINS vs L Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, L has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while L trades at $108.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check L's competition here
KINS vs CNA Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while CNA trades at $46.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNA's competition here
KINS vs AFG Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AFG trades at $129.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFG's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PE Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while WRB-PE trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PE's competition here
KINS vs KNSL Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while KNSL trades at $373.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KNSL's competition here
KINS vs AXS Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AXS trades at $103.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AXS's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PF Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while WRB-PF trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PF's competition here
KINS vs AXS-PE Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AXS-PE trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AXS-PE's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PJ Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PG Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while WRB-PG trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PG's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PH Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while WRB-PH trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PH's competition here
KINS vs THG Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while THG trades at $174.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check THG's competition here
KINS vs RLI Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while RLI trades at $60.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check RLI's competition here
KINS vs WTM Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while WTM trades at $2,194.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WTM's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PI Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while ALL-PI trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PI's competition here
KINS vs SIGI Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while SIGI trades at $83.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SIGI's competition here
KINS vs MCY Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while MCY trades at $84.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MCY's competition here
KINS vs LMND Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while LMND trades at $53.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -24.20. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check LMND's competition here
KINS vs HGTY Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while HGTY trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 39.23. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HGTY's competition here
KINS vs HGTY-WT Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
KINS vs AHL Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL's competition here
KINS vs PLMR Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while PLMR trades at $120.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PLMR's competition here
KINS vs AHL-PD Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AHL-PD trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -85.23. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL-PD's competition here
KINS vs SLDE Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while SLDE trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SLDE's competition here
KINS vs STC Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while STC trades at $67.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check STC's competition here
KINS vs HCI Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while HCI trades at $153.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HCI's competition here
KINS vs SKWD Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while SKWD trades at $47.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SKWD's competition here
KINS vs KMPR Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while KMPR trades at $31.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KMPR's competition here
KINS vs AHL-PE Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AHL-PE trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -84.98. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL-PE's competition here
KINS vs AFGB Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AFGB trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGB's competition here
KINS vs AFGD Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AFGD trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGD's competition here
KINS vs HMN Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while HMN trades at $42.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HMN's competition here
KINS vs AFGC Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AFGC trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGC's competition here
KINS vs AFGE Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AFGE trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGE's competition here
KINS vs KMPB Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while KMPB trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KMPB's competition here
KINS vs PRA Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while PRA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 37.68. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRA's competition here
KINS vs SAFT Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while SAFT trades at $77.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SAFT's competition here
KINS vs MHLA Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while MHLA trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MHLA's competition here
KINS vs ARGO Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARGO's competition here
KINS vs SIGIP Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while SIGIP trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SIGIP's competition here
KINS vs ASIC Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while ASIC trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ASIC's competition here
KINS vs UFCS Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while UFCS trades at $38.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UFCS's competition here
KINS vs UVE Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 872.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while UVE trades at $30.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UVE's competition here
KINS vs ROOT Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 829.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while ROOT trades at $54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ROOT's competition here
KINS vs BOW Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 816.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while BOW trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check BOW's competition here
KINS vs HRTG Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 745.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while HRTG trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HRTG's competition here
KINS vs DGICA Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 631.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while DGICA trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check DGICA's competition here
KINS vs DGICB Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 589.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while DGICB trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check DGICB's competition here
KINS vs ACIC Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 531.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while ACIC trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ACIC's competition here
KINS vs GBLI Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 404.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while GBLI trades at $28.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GBLI's competition here
KINS vs AII Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AII trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AII's competition here
KINS vs UIHC Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UIHC's competition here
KINS vs NODK Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while NODK trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 122.27. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check NODK's competition here
KINS vs PRHIZ Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 226.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while PRHIZ trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRHIZ's competition here
KINS vs CNFR Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFR's competition here
KINS vs CNFRZ Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFRZ's competition here
KINS vs PRHI Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while PRHI trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRHI's competition here
KINS vs UNAM Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UNAM's competition here
KINS vs HALL Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 145.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while HALL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HALL's competition here
KINS vs ARGO-PA Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
KINS vs Y Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check Y's competition here
KINS vs AHL-PC Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL-PC's competition here
KINS vs FNHC Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check FNHC's competition here
KINS vs STFC Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check STFC's competition here
KINS vs NSEC Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check NSEC's competition here
KINS vs GFZ Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GFZ's competition here
KINS vs MILEW Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MILEW's competition here
KINS vs MILE Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MILE's competition here
KINS vs AFHBL Comparison February 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 224.9M. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.54, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.07, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFHBL's competition here