Kingstone Companies, Inc.
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KINS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KINS | $15.85 | +0.51% | 221.3M | 9.69 | $1.63 | N/A |
| PGR | $242.06 | -2.15% | 146.6B | 14.08 | $17.76 | +1.96% |
| CB | $266.50 | -1.36% | 107.9B | 11.89 | $22.64 | +1.37% |
| TRV | $256.89 | -1.95% | 58.8B | 11.55 | $22.61 | +1.63% |
| ALL-PH | $21.18 | +0.05% | 52.6B | 3.38 | $6.29 | +1.96% |
| ALL-PB | $25.60 | -0.08% | 52.4B | 2.13 | $12.04 | +1.96% |
| ALL | $192.92 | -0.53% | 51.8B | 13.37 | $14.64 | +1.96% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.96% |
| WRB-PG | $16.62 | +0.85% | 26.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.29% |
| WRB | $68.04 | -0.73% | 26.2B | 15.68 | $4.40 | +2.29% |
Stock Comparison
KINS vs PGR Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while PGR trades at $242.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PGR's competition here
KINS vs CB Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while CB trades at $266.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CB's competition here
KINS vs TRV Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while TRV trades at $256.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check TRV's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PH Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while ALL-PH trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PH's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PB Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while ALL-PB trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PB's competition here
KINS vs ALL Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while ALL trades at $192.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PG Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PG's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PG Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while WRB-PG trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PG's competition here
KINS vs WRB Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while WRB trades at $68.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PH Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while WRB-PH trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PH's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PF Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while WRB-PF trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PF's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PE Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while WRB-PE trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PE's competition here
KINS vs MKL Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while MKL trades at $2,019.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MKL's competition here
KINS vs CINF Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while CINF trades at $148.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CINF's competition here
KINS vs L Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, L has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while L trades at $90.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas L's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check L's competition here
KINS vs CNA Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while CNA trades at $44.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNA's competition here
KINS vs KNSL Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while KNSL trades at $476.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KNSL's competition here
KINS vs AFGC Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AFGC trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGC's competition here
KINS vs AFGD Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AFGD trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGD's competition here
KINS vs AFGE Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AFGE trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGE's competition here
KINS vs AFG Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AFG trades at $125.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFG's competition here
KINS vs AFGB Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AFGB trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGB's competition here
KINS vs AXS-PE Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AXS-PE trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AXS-PE's competition here
KINS vs AXS Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AXS trades at $96.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AXS's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PJ Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
KINS vs RLI Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while RLI trades at $67.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check RLI's competition here
KINS vs THG Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while THG trades at $165.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check THG's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PI Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while ALL-PI trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PI's competition here
KINS vs SIGI Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while SIGI trades at $78.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SIGI's competition here
KINS vs WTM Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while WTM trades at $1,786.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 167.62. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WTM's competition here
KINS vs KMPB Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while KMPB trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KMPB's competition here
KINS vs KMPR Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while KMPR trades at $60.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KMPR's competition here
KINS vs MCY Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while MCY trades at $69.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MCY's competition here
KINS vs HGTY-WT Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
KINS vs PLMR Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while PLMR trades at $131.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PLMR's competition here
KINS vs AHL Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AHL trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL's competition here
KINS vs LMND Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while LMND trades at $38.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -13.15. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check LMND's competition here
KINS vs AHL-PD Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AHL-PD trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -82.45. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL-PD's competition here
KINS vs SKWD Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while SKWD trades at $51.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SKWD's competition here
KINS vs ROOT Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while ROOT trades at $120.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ROOT's competition here
KINS vs AHL-PE Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AHL-PE trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -82.80. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL-PE's competition here
KINS vs STC Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while STC trades at $66.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check STC's competition here
KINS vs HMN Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while HMN trades at $41.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HMN's competition here
KINS vs HCI Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while HCI trades at $138.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HCI's competition here
KINS vs MHLA Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while MHLA trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MHLA's competition here
KINS vs PRA Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while PRA trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRA's competition here
KINS vs BOW Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while BOW trades at $32.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check BOW's competition here
KINS vs ARGO Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARGO's competition here
KINS vs SAFT Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while SAFT trades at $70.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SAFT's competition here
KINS vs SIGIP Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while SIGIP trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SIGIP's competition here
KINS vs HGTY Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 976.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while HGTY trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 51.24. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HGTY's competition here
KINS vs UFCS Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 684.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while UFCS trades at $26.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UFCS's competition here
KINS vs UVE Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 645.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while UVE trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UVE's competition here
KINS vs HRTG Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 637.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while HRTG trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HRTG's competition here
KINS vs DGICA Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 617.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while DGICA trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check DGICA's competition here
KINS vs DGICB Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 597.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while DGICB trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check DGICB's competition here
KINS vs ACIC Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 514M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while ACIC trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ACIC's competition here
KINS vs GBLI Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 429.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while GBLI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GBLI's competition here
KINS vs UIHC Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UIHC's competition here
KINS vs AII Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 338.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AII trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AII's competition here
KINS vs NODK Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 273.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while NODK trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 45.55. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check NODK's competition here
KINS vs CNFRZ Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 244.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while CNFRZ trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFRZ's competition here
KINS vs CNFR Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while CNFR trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFR's competition here
KINS vs UNAM Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UNAM's competition here
KINS vs HALL Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 36.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while HALL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HALL's competition here
KINS vs ARGO-PA Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 328. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
KINS vs AHL-PC Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL-PC's competition here
KINS vs AFHBL Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFHBL's competition here
KINS vs Y Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check Y's competition here
KINS vs FNHC Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check FNHC's competition here
KINS vs MILE Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MILE's competition here
KINS vs STFC Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check STFC's competition here
KINS vs NSEC Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check NSEC's competition here
KINS vs MILEW Comparison July 2025
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 221.3M. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $15.85, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.69, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MILEW's competition here