Kimco Realty Corporation
Kimco Realty Corporation KIM Peers
See (KIM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIM | $21.02 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 27.87 | $0.76 | +4.66% |
| SPG | $160.76 | +0.00% | 53.6B | 26.16 | $6.28 | +5.08% |
| O | $57.61 | +0.00% | 52.2B | 52.55 | $1.10 | +5.96% |
| SPG-PJ | $55.76 | +0.00% | 51.4B | 8.12 | $6.78 | +5.08% |
| KIM-PN | $60.00 | +0.61% | 40.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.99% |
| KIM-PL | $19.65 | +0.00% | 14.1B | 11.91 | $1.65 | +4.66% |
| KIM-PM | $19.95 | +0.00% | 14B | 12.07 | $1.65 | +4.66% |
| REG | $71.23 | +0.00% | 12.9B | 33.70 | $2.11 | +3.90% |
| NNN | $43.18 | +0.00% | 8.2B | 20.36 | $2.14 | +5.32% |
| FRT-PC | $20.04 | +0.00% | 8.2B | 6.07 | $3.29 | +4.64% |
Stock Comparison
KIM vs SPG Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while SPG trades at $160.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPG's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs O Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, O has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while O trades at $57.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas O's P/E ratio is 52.55. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs SPG-PJ Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while SPG-PJ trades at $55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs KIM-PN Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while KIM-PN trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs KIM-PL Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while KIM-PL trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs KIM-PM Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while KIM-PM trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs REG Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while REG trades at $71.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs NNN Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while NNN trades at $43.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs FRT-PC Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while FRT-PC trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs FRT Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while FRT trades at $94.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs ADC Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while ADC trades at $73.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 41.14. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM and ADC have similar daily volatility (2.06).
KIM vs BRX Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while BRX trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs KRG Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while KRG trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 324.14. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs PECO Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while PECO trades at $35.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 60.69. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs REGCP Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while REGCP trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs MAC Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while MAC trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -33.55. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs REGCO Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while REGCO trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs SKT Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while SKT trades at $30.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs FCPT Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while FCPT trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs AKR Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while AKR trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 109.59. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM and AKR have similar daily volatility (2.06).
KIM vs CURB Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while CURB trades at $22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 190.08. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs ROIC Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs IVT Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while IVT trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 114.00. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs ADC-PA Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while ADC-PA trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs GTY Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while GTY trades at $27.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs NTST Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while NTST trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is -113.57. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs ALX Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while ALX trades at $225.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs RPT-PD Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs BFS Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 840.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while BFS trades at $34.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs UBP Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs UBA Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs BFS-PD Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 822.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while BFS-PD trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs UBP-PK Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs CBL Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 798.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while CBL trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs UBP-PH Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs WSR Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 638.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while WSR trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs SITC Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 602.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while SITC trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs BFS-PE Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 503.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while BFS-PE trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs SITC-PA Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs CDR-PB Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 217.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while CDR-PB trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs PINE Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while PINE trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is 182.83. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs CDR-PC Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 203.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while CDR-PC trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs SRG Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 172.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while SRG trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs SRG-PA Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 170.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while SRG-PA trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs WHLRL Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while WHLRL trades at $121.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -81.10. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs WHLRP Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while WHLRP trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs WHLRD Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while WHLRD trades at $34.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs WHLR Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while WHLR trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs BPYUP Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs BPYU Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs WPG Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs WRI Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs PEI Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs HMG Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs RVI Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while RVI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs NNN-PF Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs PEI-PD Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs CDR Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs PEI-PB Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.
KIM vs PEI-PC Comparison
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $21.02, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.87, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.