KDDL Limited
KDDL Limited (KDDL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KDDL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDDL.NS | ₹2,026.00 | -2.42% | 24.9B | 29.93 | ₹67.68 | +0.99% |
| TITAN.BO | ₹3,952.10 | -0.74% | 3.5T | 84.55 | ₹46.74 | +0.28% |
| TITAN.NS | ₹3,951.40 | -0.76% | 3.5T | 73.51 | ₹53.75 | +0.28% |
| KALYANKJIL.NS | ₹375.90 | -3.21% | 388.2B | 34.33 | ₹10.95 | +0.40% |
| KALYANKJIL.BO | ₹375.85 | -3.22% | 388.1B | 34.32 | ₹10.95 | +0.40% |
| THANGAMAYL.NS | ₹3,425.90 | -0.15% | 106.5B | 44.18 | ₹77.54 | +0.36% |
| THANGAMAYL.BO | ₹3,419.45 | -0.19% | 106.3B | 44.17 | ₹77.42 | +0.36% |
| PNGJL.NS | ₹530.95 | -4.05% | 72.1B | 18.24 | ₹29.11 | N/A |
| BLUESTONE.NS | ₹467.15 | -4.66% | 70.9B | -114.78 | -₹4.07 | N/A |
| ETHOSLTD.NS | ₹2,183.30 | -1.85% | 58.4B | 112.83 | ₹19.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KDDL.NS vs TITAN.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, TITAN.BO has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while TITAN.BO trades at ₹3,952.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas TITAN.BO's P/E ratio is 84.55. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TITAN.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check TITAN.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs TITAN.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, TITAN.NS has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while TITAN.NS trades at ₹3,951.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas TITAN.NS's P/E ratio is 73.51. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TITAN.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check TITAN.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KALYANKJIL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.NS has a market cap of 388.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while KALYANKJIL.NS trades at ₹375.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas KALYANKJIL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KALYANKJIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KALYANKJIL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.BO has a market cap of 388.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while KALYANKJIL.BO trades at ₹375.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas KALYANKJIL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.32. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KALYANKJIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs THANGAMAYL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.NS has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while THANGAMAYL.NS trades at ₹3,425.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas THANGAMAYL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THANGAMAYL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs THANGAMAYL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.BO has a market cap of 106.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while THANGAMAYL.BO trades at ₹3,419.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas THANGAMAYL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.17. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THANGAMAYL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs PNGJL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, PNGJL.NS has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while PNGJL.NS trades at ₹530.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas PNGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNGJL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to PNGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check PNGJL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs BLUESTONE.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BLUESTONE.NS has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while BLUESTONE.NS trades at ₹467.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas BLUESTONE.NS's P/E ratio is -114.78. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLUESTONE.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTONE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check BLUESTONE.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs ETHOSLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.NS has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while ETHOSLTD.NS trades at ₹2,183.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas ETHOSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 112.83. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETHOSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs ETHOSLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.BO has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while ETHOSLTD.BO trades at ₹2,175.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas ETHOSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 111.54. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETHOSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs PCJEWELLER.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.NS has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while PCJEWELLER.NS trades at ₹7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas PCJEWELLER.NS's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCJEWELLER.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs PCJEWELLER.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.BO has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while PCJEWELLER.BO trades at ₹7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas PCJEWELLER.BO's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCJEWELLER.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SKYGOLD.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.NS has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while SKYGOLD.NS trades at ₹318.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas SKYGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to SKYGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SKYGOLD.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SKYGOLD.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.BO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while SKYGOLD.BO trades at ₹318.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas SKYGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to SKYGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SKYGOLD.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SENCO.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SENCO.NS has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while SENCO.NS trades at ₹278.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas SENCO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SENCO.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to SENCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SENCO.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SENCO.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SENCO.BO has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while SENCO.BO trades at ₹278.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas SENCO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SENCO.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SENCO.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs GOLDIAM.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.NS has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while GOLDIAM.NS trades at ₹268.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas GOLDIAM.NS's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOLDIAM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDIAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check GOLDIAM.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs GOLDIAM.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while GOLDIAM.BO trades at ₹268.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas GOLDIAM.BO's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOLDIAM.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check GOLDIAM.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.BO has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while VAIBHAVGBL.BO trades at ₹175.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.NS has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while VAIBHAVGBL.NS trades at ₹175.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KDDL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, KDDL.BO has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while KDDL.BO trades at ₹2,032.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas KDDL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KDDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to KDDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KDDL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while RAJESHEXPO.BO trades at ₹80.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas RAJESHEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.NS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while RAJESHEXPO.NS trades at ₹80.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas RAJESHEXPO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs DPABHUSHAN.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, DPABHUSHAN.NS has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while DPABHUSHAN.NS trades at ₹943.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas DPABHUSHAN.NS's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check DPABHUSHAN.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs BRIGHOTEL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while BRIGHOTEL.BO trades at ₹55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas BRIGHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check BRIGHOTEL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs AAYUSHBULL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AAYUSHBULL.BO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while AAYUSHBULL.BO trades at ₹1,124.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas AAYUSHBULL.BO's P/E ratio is 995.13. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check AAYUSHBULL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while SHANTIGOLD.BO trades at ₹157.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas SHANTIGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while SHANTIGOLD.NS trades at ₹156.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas SHANTIGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs MOTISONS.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MOTISONS.NS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while MOTISONS.NS trades at ₹10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas MOTISONS.NS's P/E ratio is -57.00. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOTISONS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to MOTISONS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check MOTISONS.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RGL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RGL.NS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while RGL.NS trades at ₹97.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas RGL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RGL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RGL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RGL.BO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while RGL.BO trades at ₹96.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas RGL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RGL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs TBZ.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, TBZ.NS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while TBZ.NS trades at ₹111.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas TBZ.NS's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBZ.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to TBZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check TBZ.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs TBZ.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, TBZ.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while TBZ.BO trades at ₹111.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas TBZ.BO's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBZ.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to TBZ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check TBZ.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs MVGJL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MVGJL.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while MVGJL.BO trades at ₹132.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas MVGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MVGJL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to MVGJL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check MVGJL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs MVGJL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MVGJL.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while MVGJL.NS trades at ₹131.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas MVGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MVGJL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to MVGJL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check MVGJL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while RADHIKAJWE.BO trades at ₹50.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas RADHIKAJWE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while RADHIKAJWE.NS trades at ₹50.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas RADHIKAJWE.NS's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs LGHL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, LGHL.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while LGHL.NS trades at ₹228.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas LGHL.NS's P/E ratio is 100.93. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LGHL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to LGHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check LGHL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RBZJEWEL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RBZJEWEL.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while RBZJEWEL.NS trades at ₹102.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas RBZJEWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RBZJEWEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RBZJEWEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RBZJEWEL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SILGO.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SILGO.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while SILGO.NS trades at ₹71.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas SILGO.NS's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SILGO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to SILGO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SILGO.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs MOKSH.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MOKSH.NS has a market cap of 722.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while MOKSH.NS trades at ₹8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas MOKSH.NS's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOKSH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to MOKSH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check MOKSH.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs EFORU.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, EFORU.BO has a market cap of 526.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while EFORU.BO trades at ₹88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas EFORU.BO's P/E ratio is 48.09. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EFORU.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to EFORU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check EFORU.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RRETAIL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, RRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 404.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while RRETAIL.BO trades at ₹2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas RRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is -25.80. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RRETAIL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to RRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RRETAIL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs GOENKA.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, GOENKA.NS has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while GOENKA.NS trades at ₹0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas GOENKA.NS's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOENKA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to GOENKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check GOENKA.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KANANIIND.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, KANANIIND.BO has a market cap of 211.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while KANANIIND.BO trades at ₹1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas KANANIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KANANIIND.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KANANIIND.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KANANIIND.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, KANANIIND.NS has a market cap of 209.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while KANANIIND.NS trades at ₹1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas KANANIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KANANIIND.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KANANIIND.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs ZODJRDMKJ.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ZODJRDMKJ.NS has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while ZODJRDMKJ.NS trades at ₹31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas ZODJRDMKJ.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check ZODJRDMKJ.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.BO has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while LYPSAGEMS.BO trades at ₹4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas LYPSAGEMS.BO's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 24.9B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.NS has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,026.00, while LYPSAGEMS.NS trades at ₹4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.93, whereas LYPSAGEMS.NS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.NS's competition here