KDDL Limited
KDDL Limited (KDDL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KDDL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDDL.BO | ₹2,007.90 | -8.27% | 25.6B | 30.80 | ₹67.64 | +0.96% |
| TITAN.NS | ₹3,940.20 | -2.45% | 3.5T | 74.12 | ₹53.72 | +0.28% |
| TITAN.BO | ₹3,938.40 | -2.48% | 3.5T | 85.18 | ₹46.74 | +0.28% |
| KALYANKJIL.BO | ₹378.85 | -3.32% | 401B | 35.53 | ₹10.93 | +0.39% |
| KALYANKJIL.NS | ₹379.70 | -3.10% | 401B | 35.53 | ₹10.93 | +0.39% |
| THANGAMAYL.NS | ₹3,412.30 | -5.18% | 106.6B | 44.35 | ₹77.37 | +0.36% |
| THANGAMAYL.BO | ₹3,425.65 | -4.69% | 106.5B | 44.33 | ₹77.28 | +0.36% |
| PNGJL.NS | ₹529.75 | -6.26% | 75.1B | 19.02 | ₹29.10 | N/A |
| BLUESTONE.NS | ₹468.60 | -5.11% | 74.4B | -119.51 | -₹4.10 | N/A |
| ETHOSLTD.NS | ₹2,194.30 | -3.90% | 59.5B | 114.61 | ₹19.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KDDL.BO vs TITAN.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TITAN.NS has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while TITAN.NS trades at ₹3,940.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas TITAN.NS's P/E ratio is 74.12. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TITAN.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to TITAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check TITAN.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs TITAN.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TITAN.BO has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while TITAN.BO trades at ₹3,938.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas TITAN.BO's P/E ratio is 85.18. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TITAN.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to TITAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check TITAN.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs KALYANKJIL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.BO has a market cap of 401B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while KALYANKJIL.BO trades at ₹378.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas KALYANKJIL.BO's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KALYANKJIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check KALYANKJIL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs KALYANKJIL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.NS has a market cap of 401B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while KALYANKJIL.NS trades at ₹379.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas KALYANKJIL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KALYANKJIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check KALYANKJIL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs THANGAMAYL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.NS has a market cap of 106.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while THANGAMAYL.NS trades at ₹3,412.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas THANGAMAYL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.35. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THANGAMAYL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check THANGAMAYL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs THANGAMAYL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.BO has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while THANGAMAYL.BO trades at ₹3,425.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas THANGAMAYL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.33. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THANGAMAYL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check THANGAMAYL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs PNGJL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PNGJL.NS has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while PNGJL.NS trades at ₹529.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas PNGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNGJL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to PNGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check PNGJL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs BLUESTONE.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, BLUESTONE.NS has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while BLUESTONE.NS trades at ₹468.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas BLUESTONE.NS's P/E ratio is -119.51. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLUESTONE.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to BLUESTONE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check BLUESTONE.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs ETHOSLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.NS has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while ETHOSLTD.NS trades at ₹2,194.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas ETHOSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 114.61. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETHOSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check ETHOSLTD.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs ETHOSLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.BO has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while ETHOSLTD.BO trades at ₹2,177.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas ETHOSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 113.59. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETHOSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check ETHOSLTD.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs PCJEWELLER.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.BO has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while PCJEWELLER.BO trades at ₹7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas PCJEWELLER.BO's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCJEWELLER.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check PCJEWELLER.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs PCJEWELLER.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.NS has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while PCJEWELLER.NS trades at ₹7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas PCJEWELLER.NS's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCJEWELLER.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check PCJEWELLER.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SKYGOLD.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.NS has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while SKYGOLD.NS trades at ₹326.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas SKYGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to SKYGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SKYGOLD.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SKYGOLD.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.BO has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while SKYGOLD.BO trades at ₹326.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas SKYGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to SKYGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SKYGOLD.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SENCO.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SENCO.NS has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while SENCO.NS trades at ₹280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas SENCO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SENCO.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to SENCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SENCO.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SENCO.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SENCO.BO has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while SENCO.BO trades at ₹280.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas SENCO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SENCO.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to SENCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SENCO.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs GOLDIAM.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.BO has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while GOLDIAM.BO trades at ₹268.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas GOLDIAM.BO's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOLDIAM.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check GOLDIAM.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs GOLDIAM.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.NS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while GOLDIAM.NS trades at ₹268.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas GOLDIAM.NS's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOLDIAM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check GOLDIAM.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs VAIBHAVGBL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.NS has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while VAIBHAVGBL.NS trades at ₹178.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check VAIBHAVGBL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs VAIBHAVGBL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.BO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while VAIBHAVGBL.BO trades at ₹178.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check VAIBHAVGBL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs KDDL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, KDDL.NS has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while KDDL.NS trades at ₹2,011.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas KDDL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KDDL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to KDDL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check KDDL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RAJESHEXPO.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.BO has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while RAJESHEXPO.BO trades at ₹80.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas RAJESHEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RAJESHEXPO.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RAJESHEXPO.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.NS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while RAJESHEXPO.NS trades at ₹80.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas RAJESHEXPO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RAJESHEXPO.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs DPABHUSHAN.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, DPABHUSHAN.NS has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while DPABHUSHAN.NS trades at ₹945.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas DPABHUSHAN.NS's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check DPABHUSHAN.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs BRIGHOTEL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while BRIGHOTEL.BO trades at ₹54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas BRIGHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.45. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check BRIGHOTEL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs AAYUSHBULL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, AAYUSHBULL.BO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while AAYUSHBULL.BO trades at ₹1,132.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas AAYUSHBULL.BO's P/E ratio is 1006.03. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check AAYUSHBULL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SHANTIGOLD.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.NS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while SHANTIGOLD.NS trades at ₹156.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas SHANTIGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SHANTIGOLD.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SHANTIGOLD.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while SHANTIGOLD.BO trades at ₹156.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas SHANTIGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SHANTIGOLD.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs MOTISONS.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MOTISONS.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while MOTISONS.NS trades at ₹10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas MOTISONS.NS's P/E ratio is -58.84. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOTISONS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to MOTISONS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check MOTISONS.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RGL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RGL.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while RGL.BO trades at ₹96.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas RGL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to RGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RGL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RGL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RGL.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while RGL.NS trades at ₹96.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas RGL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to RGL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RGL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs TBZ.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TBZ.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while TBZ.NS trades at ₹113.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas TBZ.NS's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBZ.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to TBZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check TBZ.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs TBZ.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TBZ.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while TBZ.BO trades at ₹113.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas TBZ.BO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBZ.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to TBZ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check TBZ.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs MVGJL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MVGJL.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while MVGJL.NS trades at ₹132.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas MVGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MVGJL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to MVGJL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check MVGJL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs MVGJL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MVGJL.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while MVGJL.BO trades at ₹131.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas MVGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MVGJL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to MVGJL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check MVGJL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RADHIKAJWE.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while RADHIKAJWE.NS trades at ₹51.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas RADHIKAJWE.NS's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RADHIKAJWE.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RADHIKAJWE.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while RADHIKAJWE.BO trades at ₹51.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas RADHIKAJWE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RADHIKAJWE.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs LGHL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, LGHL.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while LGHL.NS trades at ₹227.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas LGHL.NS's P/E ratio is 105.07. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LGHL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to LGHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check LGHL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RBZJEWEL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RBZJEWEL.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while RBZJEWEL.NS trades at ₹103.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas RBZJEWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RBZJEWEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to RBZJEWEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RBZJEWEL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SILGO.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SILGO.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while SILGO.NS trades at ₹71.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas SILGO.NS's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SILGO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to SILGO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SILGO.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs MOKSH.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MOKSH.NS has a market cap of 798.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while MOKSH.NS trades at ₹9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas MOKSH.NS's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOKSH.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to MOKSH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check MOKSH.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs EFORU.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, EFORU.BO has a market cap of 506.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while EFORU.BO trades at ₹84.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas EFORU.BO's P/E ratio is 46.28. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EFORU.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to EFORU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check EFORU.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RRETAIL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 424.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while RRETAIL.BO trades at ₹2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas RRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is -27.10. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RRETAIL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to RRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RRETAIL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs GOENKA.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GOENKA.NS has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while GOENKA.NS trades at ₹0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas GOENKA.NS's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOENKA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to GOENKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check GOENKA.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs KANANIIND.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, KANANIIND.NS has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while KANANIIND.NS trades at ₹1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas KANANIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KANANIIND.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check KANANIIND.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs KANANIIND.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, KANANIIND.BO has a market cap of 225.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while KANANIIND.BO trades at ₹1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas KANANIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KANANIIND.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check KANANIIND.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs ZODJRDMKJ.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ZODJRDMKJ.NS has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while ZODJRDMKJ.NS trades at ₹31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas ZODJRDMKJ.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check ZODJRDMKJ.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs LYPSAGEMS.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.NS has a market cap of 132.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while LYPSAGEMS.NS trades at ₹4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas LYPSAGEMS.NS's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check LYPSAGEMS.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs LYPSAGEMS.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 25.6B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.BO has a market cap of 132.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,007.90, while LYPSAGEMS.BO trades at ₹4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.80, whereas LYPSAGEMS.BO's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check LYPSAGEMS.BO's competition here