Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IVR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVR | $7.70 | +0.00% | 508.2M | 19.65 | $0.39 | +19.25% |
| NLY-PG | $25.45 | +0.00% | 13.8B | 14.36 | $1.77 | +12.98% |
| RITM-PA | $25.30 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 17.36 | $1.46 | +8.12% |
| RITM-PB | $25.27 | +0.02% | 13.4B | N/A | N/A | +8.12% |
| NLY-PI | $25.74 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 14.53 | $1.77 | +12.98% |
| NLY-PF | $25.86 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 14.59 | $1.77 | +12.98% |
| NLY | $20.83 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 20.01 | $1.04 | +12.98% |
| RITM-PC | $24.83 | +0.02% | 13.2B | N/A | N/A | +8.12% |
| RITM-PD | $24.49 | +0.02% | 13B | N/A | N/A | +8.12% |
| AGNC | $9.61 | +0.00% | 10B | 32.10 | $0.30 | +14.94% |
Stock Comparison
IVR vs NLY-PG Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NLY-PG trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NLY-PG's competition here
IVR vs RITM-PA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while RITM-PA trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RITM-PA's competition here
IVR vs RITM-PB Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while RITM-PB trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RITM-PB's competition here
IVR vs NLY-PI Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NLY-PI trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NLY-PI's competition here
IVR vs NLY-PF Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NLY-PF trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NLY-PF's competition here
IVR vs NLY Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NLY trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NLY's competition here
IVR vs RITM-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while RITM-PC trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RITM-PC's competition here
IVR vs RITM-PD Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while RITM-PD trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RITM-PD's competition here
IVR vs AGNC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while AGNC trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AGNC's competition here
IVR vs AGNCP Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while AGNCP trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AGNCP's competition here
IVR vs AGNCL Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while AGNCL trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AGNCL's competition here
IVR vs AGNCO Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while AGNCO trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.70. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AGNCO's competition here
IVR vs AGNCM Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while AGNCM trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.52. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AGNCM's competition here
IVR vs AGNCN Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while AGNCN trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.86. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AGNCN's competition here
IVR vs STWD Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while STWD trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check STWD's competition here
IVR vs RITM Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while RITM trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RITM's competition here
IVR vs NRZ Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NRZ's competition here
IVR vs EFC-PE Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EFC-PE's competition here
IVR vs ABR-PF Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while ABR-PF trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ABR-PF's competition here
IVR vs ABR-PE Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while ABR-PE trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ABR-PE's competition here
IVR vs ABR-PD Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while ABR-PD trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ABR-PD's competition here
IVR vs RWT-PA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while RWT-PA trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RWT-PA's competition here
IVR vs RWTN Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while RWTN trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWTN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RWTN's competition here
IVR vs BXMT Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while BXMT trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is -269.50. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BXMT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check BXMT's competition here
IVR vs RC-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while RC-PC trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RC-PC's competition here
IVR vs EFC-PA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while EFC-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EFC-PA's competition here
IVR vs RC-PE Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while RC-PE trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RC-PE's competition here
IVR vs MFA-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while MFA-PC trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MFA-PC's competition here
IVR vs EFC-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while EFC-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EFC-PC's competition here
IVR vs EFC-PB Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while EFC-PB trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EFC-PB's competition here
IVR vs EFC-PD Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while EFC-PD trades at $23.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EFC-PD's competition here
IVR vs NYMTM Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NYMTM trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 527.23. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMTM's competition here
IVR vs ABR Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while ABR trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ABR's competition here
IVR vs NYMTL Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NYMTL trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 467.45. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMTL's competition here
IVR vs FBRT-PE Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while FBRT-PE trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check FBRT-PE's competition here
IVR vs ARR-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while ARR-PC trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ARR-PC's competition here
IVR vs ARR Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while ARR trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is -40.69. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ARR's competition here
IVR vs PMT-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while PMT-PC trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -25.88. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check PMT-PC's competition here
IVR vs NYMTZ Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NYMTZ trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 387.41. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMTZ's competition here
IVR vs DX-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while DX-PC trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check DX-PC's competition here
IVR vs DX Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while DX trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check DX's competition here
IVR vs LADR Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while LADR trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check LADR's competition here
IVR vs TRTX-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while TRTX-PC trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check TRTX-PC's competition here
IVR vs ARI Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while ARI trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is -67.17. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ARI's competition here
IVR vs KREF-PA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while KREF-PA trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check KREF-PA's competition here
IVR vs EFC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while EFC trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EFC's competition here
IVR vs NYMTO Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMTO's competition here
IVR vs SCCC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while SCCC trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check SCCC's competition here
IVR vs ORC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while ORC trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 51.04. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ORC's competition here
IVR vs LFT-PA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while LFT-PA trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is 93.80. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check LFT-PA's competition here
IVR vs CIM-PD Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while CIM-PD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CIM-PD's competition here
IVR vs CIM-PA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while CIM-PA trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CIM-PA's competition here
IVR vs CIM-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while CIM-PC trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CIM-PC's competition here
IVR vs CIM-PB Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while CIM-PB trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 33.97. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CIM-PB's competition here
IVR vs CIM Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while CIM trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CIM's competition here
IVR vs PMT-PA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while PMT-PA trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -33.30. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check PMT-PA's competition here
IVR vs PMT-PB Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while PMT-PB trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -33.16. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check PMT-PB's competition here
IVR vs TWO-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while TWO-PC trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check TWO-PC's competition here
IVR vs TWO-PB Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while TWO-PB trades at $23.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check TWO-PB's competition here
IVR vs PMT Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while PMT trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check PMT's competition here
IVR vs TWO Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while TWO trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check TWO's competition here
IVR vs TWO-PA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while TWO-PA trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check TWO-PA's competition here
IVR vs MFA-PB Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while MFA-PB trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MFA-PB's competition here
IVR vs MFAN Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while MFAN trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MFAN's competition here
IVR vs MFAO Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while MFAO trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MFAO's competition here
IVR vs MFA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 996.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while MFA trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MFA's competition here
IVR vs GPMT-PA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 939.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while GPMT-PA trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check GPMT-PA's competition here
IVR vs FBRT Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 906.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while FBRT trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check FBRT's competition here
IVR vs MITT-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 778.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while MITT-PC trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MITT-PC's competition here
IVR vs SACH-PA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 769.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while SACH-PA trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 37.70. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check SACH-PA's competition here
IVR vs RWT Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 766.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while RWT trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RWT's competition here
IVR vs TRTX Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 714.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while TRTX trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check TRTX's competition here
IVR vs RCB Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 642.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while RCB trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RCB's competition here
IVR vs BRMK Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check BRMK's competition here
IVR vs AIC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIC's ROE of +4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AIC's competition here
IVR vs RC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 627.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while RC trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RC's competition here
IVR vs NYMTN Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 618.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NYMTN trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 464.47. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMTN's competition here
IVR vs NYMT Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 617.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NYMT trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMT's competition here
IVR vs KREF Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 606.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while KREF trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is -13.99. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KREF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check KREF's competition here
IVR vs IVR-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 508M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while IVR-PC trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check IVR-PC's competition here
IVR vs CMTG Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 486.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while CMTG trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CMTG's competition here
IVR vs NREF-PA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 407.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NREF-PA trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NREF-PA's competition here
IVR vs REFI Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, REFI has a market cap of 293.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while REFI trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas REFI's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to REFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check REFI's competition here
IVR vs NREF Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 257.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while NREF trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NREF's competition here
IVR vs ACRE Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 247.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while ACRE trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ACRE's competition here
IVR vs MITT-PA Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, MITT-PA has a market cap of 236.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while MITT-PA trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas MITT-PA's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MITT-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MITT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MITT-PA's competition here
IVR vs MITN Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 236.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while MITN trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MITN's competition here
IVR vs MITT-PB Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, MITT-PB has a market cap of 235.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while MITT-PB trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas MITT-PB's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MITT-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MITT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MITT-PB's competition here
IVR vs MITT Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 233.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while MITT trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MITT's competition here
IVR vs AOMR Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, AOMR has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while AOMR trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AOMR's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AOMR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to AOMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AOMR's competition here
IVR vs EARN Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, EARN has a market cap of 210.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while EARN trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas EARN's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EARN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to EARN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EARN's competition here
IVR vs ACR-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, ACR-PC has a market cap of 188.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while ACR-PC trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ACR-PC's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACR-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ACR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ACR-PC's competition here
IVR vs ACR-PD Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, ACR-PD has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while ACR-PD trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ACR-PD's P/E ratio is 43.87. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACR-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ACR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ACR-PD's competition here
IVR vs SEVN Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, SEVN has a market cap of 156.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while SEVN trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas SEVN's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to SEVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check SEVN's competition here
IVR vs ACR Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, ACR has a market cap of 148.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while ACR trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ACR's P/E ratio is -665.67. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ACR's competition here
IVR vs AJX Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, AJX has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while AJX trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AJX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AJX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AJX's competition here
IVR vs AAIC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, AAIC has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while AAIC trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AAIC's P/E ratio is -60.50. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to AAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AAIC's competition here
IVR vs AAIC-PB Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, AAIC-PB has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while AAIC-PB trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AAIC-PB's P/E ratio is -69.28. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAIC-PB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to AAIC-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AAIC-PB's competition here
IVR vs AAIC-PC Comparison August 2025
IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 508.2M. In comparison, AAIC-PC has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.70, while AAIC-PC trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AAIC-PC's P/E ratio is -83.79. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAIC-PC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AAIC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AAIC-PC's competition here