Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A.
Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. ITUB Peers
See (ITUB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITUB | $6.46 | -2.34% | 65.55B | 9.63 | $0.67 | +7.49% |
HDB | $72.55 | +2.94% | 185.14B | 22.05 | $3.29 | +0.82% |
PNC | $175.02 | +5.16% | 69.23B | 12.37 | $14.15 | +3.65% |
USB | $44.01 | +4.72% | 68.56B | 10.89 | $4.04 | +4.52% |
USB-PS | $18.65 | -0.10% | 67.87B | N/A | N/A | +4.52% |
USB-PA | $846.03 | -0.35% | 65.47B | 241.03 | $3.51 | +4.52% |
USB-PP | $22.71 | +0.40% | 65.41B | 4.90 | $4.64 | +4.52% |
USB-PH | $20.75 | -0.81% | 64.94B | 4.47 | $4.64 | +4.52% |
MFG | $5.16 | +1.18% | 64.74B | 10.53 | $0.49 | +1.24% |
IBN | $33.58 | +3.93% | 59.84B | 19.87 | $1.69 | +0.71% |
Stock Comparison
ITUB vs HDB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 185.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while HDB trades at $72.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs PNC Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 69.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while PNC trades at $175.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs USB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 68.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while USB trades at $44.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs USB-PS Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 67.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while USB-PS trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs USB-PA Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 65.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while USB-PA trades at $846.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 241.03. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs USB-PP Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 65.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while USB-PP trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs USB-PH Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 64.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while USB-PH trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs MFG Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 64.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while MFG trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs IBN Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 59.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while IBN trades at $33.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs LYG Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 57.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while LYG trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs TFC Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 53.86B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while TFC trades at $41.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -216.47. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs DB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 53.39B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while DB trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs BSBR Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 38.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while BSBR trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB and BSBR have similar daily volatility (2.47).
ITUB vs HBANL Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while HBANL trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs HBANM Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 33.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while HBANM trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs TFC-PI Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 30.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while TFC-PI trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs MTB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 29.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while MTB trades at $184.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs TFC-PO Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while TFC-PO trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs BBD Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 27.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while BBD trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FITB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 26.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FITB trades at $39.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs HBANP Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while HBANP trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FCNCA Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 26.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FCNCA trades at $1,940.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs BBDO Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 25.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while BBDO trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs USB-PR Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while USB-PR trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs KB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 25.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while KB trades at $66.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs TFC-PR Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while TFC-PR trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FCNCP Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FCNCP trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FCNCO Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FCNCO trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs USB-PQ Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 24.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while USB-PQ trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs HBAN Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 23.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while HBAN trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs RF-PF Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while RF-PF trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs RF Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 20.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while RF trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs RF-PC Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 19.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while RF-PC trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs KEY Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 18.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while KEY trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -86.79. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs CFG Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 18.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while CFG trades at $41.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs KEY-PL Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 17.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while KEY-PL trades at $24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs KEY-PJ Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 16.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs KEY-PK Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 16.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while KEY-PK trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FITBI Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FITBI trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs KEY-PI Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 16.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while KEY-PI trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FITBP Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FITBP trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs BAP Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 16.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while BAP trades at $202.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs SHG Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 15.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while SHG trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs RF-PE Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while RF-PE trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs BCH Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 15.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while BCH trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs CFG-PD Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FITBO Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 14.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FITBO trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FHN-PB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FHN-PB trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FHN-PC Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FHN-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs CFG-PH Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while CFG-PH trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FHN-PE Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 11.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FHN-PE trades at $23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs CIB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 10.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while CIB trades at $40.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FHN Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FHN trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs GGAL Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 10.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while GGAL trades at $61.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs WF Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 9.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while WF trades at $38.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs SSB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while SSB trades at $91.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FHN-PF Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FHN-PF trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs WBS Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 8.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while WBS trades at $52.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FHN-PD Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs CBSH Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while CBSH trades at $65.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs WAL Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while WAL trades at $79.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs PNFP Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while PNFP trades at $110.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs CFG-PE Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while CFG-PE trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs CFR Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while CFR trades at $130.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs ONB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while ONB trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs UMBF Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while UMBF trades at $107.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs WTFC Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while WTFC trades at $121.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs ONBPO Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while ONBPO trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs ONBPP Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 7.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while ONBPP trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs WTFCM Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 7.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while WTFCM trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs CMA Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while CMA trades at $58.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs BSMX Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs ZION Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while ZION trades at $49.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs BPOP Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while BPOP trades at $103.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs PB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while PB trades at $73.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs SNV Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.86B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while SNV trades at $49.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs SNV-PD Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while SNV-PD trades at $24.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs BOKF Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while BOKF trades at $98.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs CADE Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while CADE trades at $32.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs HOMB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while HOMB trades at $29.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs BMA Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while BMA trades at $92.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs COLB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while COLB trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs UBSI Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while UBSI trades at $37.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs OZK Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while OZK trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs BXS Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FFIN Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FFIN trades at $36.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FLG Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FLG trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs FNB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while FNB trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs VLY Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while VLY trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs GBCI Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while GBCI trades at $44.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs VLYPP Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 4.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while VLYPP trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs HWC Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 4.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while HWC trades at $57.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs VLYPO Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 4.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while VLYPO trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs HWCPZ Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while HWCPZ trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs AUB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while AUB trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs NYCB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, NYCB has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while NYCB trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas NYCB's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NYCB's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to NYCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs BBAR Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, BBAR has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while BBAR trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BBAR's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to BBAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs ABCB Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while ABCB trades at $62.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.
ITUB vs SFBS Comparison
ITUB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITUB stands at 65.55B. In comparison, SFBS has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ITUB is priced at $6.46, while SFBS trades at $78.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITUB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SFBS's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, ITUB's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SFBS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITUB is less volatile compared to SFBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITUB.