Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. HEP Peers
See (HEP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEP | $20.45 | -0.78% | 2.59B | 10.76 | $1.90 | N/A |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.25B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +7.20% |
| EP-PC | $49.00 | +0.51% | 108.88B | N/A | N/A | +4.85% |
| ENB | $44.89 | +0.71% | 97.86B | 23.14 | $1.94 | +4.44% |
| WMB | $58.20 | +0.22% | 71.06B | 31.29 | $1.86 | +3.31% |
| EPD | $32.01 | +0.77% | 69.42B | 11.99 | $2.67 | +6.62% |
| ET | $18.15 | +0.83% | 62.29B | 13.75 | $1.32 | +7.20% |
| KMI | $27.44 | -0.24% | 60.96B | 23.65 | $1.16 | +4.22% |
| OKE | $86.61 | +0.12% | 54.10B | 16.92 | $5.12 | +4.68% |
| LNG | $233.21 | +0.21% | 51.72B | 17.10 | $13.64 | +0.83% |
Stock Comparison
HEP vs ET-PE Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.25B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs EP-PC Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 108.88B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while EP-PC trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs ENB Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 97.86B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while ENB trades at $44.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs WMB Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 71.06B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while WMB trades at $58.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs EPD Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 69.42B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while EPD trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs ET Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 62.29B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while ET trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs KMI Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 60.96B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while KMI trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs OKE Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 54.10B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while OKE trades at $86.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs LNG Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 51.72B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while LNG trades at $233.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs MPLX Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 51.60B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while MPLX trades at $50.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs TRP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 50.84B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while TRP trades at $48.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs ET-PC Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs ET-PD Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs ENBA Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs ET-PI Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 39.71B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while ET-PI trades at $11.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs TRGP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 36.56B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while TRGP trades at $168.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs CQP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 28.84B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while CQP trades at $59.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CQP's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs VG Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 24.55B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while VG trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs PBA Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 21.74B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while PBA trades at $37.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs WES Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 15.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while WES trades at $39.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs MMP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs PAA Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 12.24B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while PAA trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs DTM Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 10.43B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while DTM trades at $102.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs VNOM Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 9.36B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while VNOM trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs AM Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 8.90B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while AM trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs DCP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.70B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs HESM Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.36B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while HESM trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HESM's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs DCP-PC Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs ENLC Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs ETRN Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs GLNG Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while GLNG trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 83.10. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs FRO Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while FRO trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs PAGP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while PAGP trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs EURN Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs CEQP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs KNTK Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while KNTK trades at $46.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 49.07. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs NS Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs NS-PA Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs NS-PB Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs NS-PC Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs RTLR Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs SEAL-PB Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs SEAL-PA Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs DKL Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while DKL trades at $40.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DKL's ROE of +584.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs STNG Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while STNG trades at $41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs NSS Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs INSW Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while INSW trades at $38.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs GEL Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while GEL trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs DHT Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while DHT trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs TRMD Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while TRMD trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs GLP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while GLP trades at $49.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs TNK Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while TNK trades at $45.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs GLOG-PA Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs FLNG Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while FLNG trades at $24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs GLP-PA Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs CEQP-P Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs LPG Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while LPG trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs TNP-PE Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.18M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs NVGS Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 949.57M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while NVGS trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs GLP-PB Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 867.92M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while GLP-PB trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs TEN-PE Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 781.21M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while TEN-PE trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs TK Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 677.51M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while TK trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs OSG Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.26M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while OSG trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs TEN Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 548.62M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while TEN trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs TNP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.36M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs PBT Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 487.53M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while PBT trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBT's ROE of +134.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs NGL Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 447.52M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while NGL trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs NGL-PB Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 433.35M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while NGL-PB trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -9.21. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs NGL-PC Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 415.56M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while NGL-PC trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -9.22. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs GLOP-PB Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 414.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.55. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs GLOP-PC Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 412.94M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -58.26. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs SMLP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.18M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMLP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs GLOP-PA Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 405.08M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -57.15. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs DSSI Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.82M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs SMC Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 359.28M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while SMC trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs SNMP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.35M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs TNP-PF Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.19M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs TNP-PD Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.71M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs GPP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.39M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPP's ROE of -14.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs GLOP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.11M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs DLNG-PB Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 140.74M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while DLNG-PB trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs DLNG-PA Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 139.20M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 265.31. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is more volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs DLNG Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 137.41M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while DLNG trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs BROG Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 118.70M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while BROG trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs MMLP Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 117.17M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while MMLP trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP and MMLP have similar daily volatility (2.48).
HEP vs BANL Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 25.30M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while BANL trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs PTLE Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 19.03M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while PTLE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs MARPS Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 7.78M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while MARPS trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs RBNE Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 6.75M. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while RBNE trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RBNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.
HEP vs BROGW Comparison
HEP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEP stands at 2.59B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61450.00. Regarding current trading prices, HEP is priced at $20.45, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.76, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEP's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HEP is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEP.