ESS Tech, Inc. WT
ESS Tech, Inc. WT (GWH-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GWH-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWH-WT | $0.04 | +10.75% | 15.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VRT | $245.48 | +0.71% | 93.9B | 72.20 | $3.40 | +0.07% |
| ABB | $37.13 | N/A | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| BE | $160.28 | +8.63% | 37.9B | -433.19 | -$0.37 | N/A |
| HUBB | $517.33 | -1.78% | 27.5B | 31.28 | $16.54 | +1.02% |
| NVT | $114.94 | -1.65% | 18.5B | 44.38 | $2.59 | +0.69% |
| AEIS | $329.24 | -0.60% | 12.4B | 84.86 | $3.88 | +0.12% |
| AYI | $300.09 | -3.45% | 9.2B | 23.10 | $12.99 | +0.23% |
| POWL | $544.15 | -0.49% | 6.6B | 35.36 | $15.39 | +0.20% |
| ENS | $167.45 | -3.33% | 6.2B | 20.80 | $8.05 | +0.58% |
Stock Comparison
GWH-WT vs VRT Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while VRT trades at $245.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 72.20. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check VRT's competition here
GWH-WT vs ABB Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ABB's competition here
GWH-WT vs BE Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while BE trades at $160.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BE's P/E ratio is -433.19. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to BE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check BE's competition here
GWH-WT vs HUBB Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while HUBB trades at $517.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check HUBB's competition here
GWH-WT vs NVT Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while NVT trades at $114.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 44.38. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check NVT's competition here
GWH-WT vs AEIS Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while AEIS trades at $329.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 84.86. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check AEIS's competition here
GWH-WT vs AYI Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while AYI trades at $300.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check AYI's competition here
GWH-WT vs POWL Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while POWL trades at $544.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check POWL's competition here
GWH-WT vs ENS Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ENS trades at $167.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ENS's competition here
GWH-WT vs WIRE Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check WIRE's competition here
GWH-WT vs HAYW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while HAYW trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check HAYW's competition here
GWH-WT vs EOSE Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while EOSE trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check EOSE's competition here
GWH-WT vs ATKR Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ATKR trades at $65.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is -49.01. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ATKR's competition here
GWH-WT vs PLUG Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while PLUG trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check PLUG's competition here
GWH-WT vs HOLI Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check HOLI's competition here
GWH-WT vs ENR Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ENR trades at $22.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ENR's competition here
GWH-WT vs AMPX Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while AMPX trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -37.85. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check AMPX's competition here
GWH-WT vs ENVX Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ENVX trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ENVX's competition here
GWH-WT vs PLPC Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while PLPC trades at $255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check PLPC's competition here
GWH-WT vs TE Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 966.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while TE trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to TE's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check TE's competition here
GWH-WT vs ADSE Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 745.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ADSE trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ADSE's competition here
GWH-WT vs MVST Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 692.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while MVST trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check MVST's competition here
GWH-WT vs SLDP Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 619.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while SLDP trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check SLDP's competition here
GWH-WT vs KE Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 608.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while KE trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check KE's competition here
GWH-WT vs AMPX-WT Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 512.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while AMPX-WT trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -10.13. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
GWH-WT vs EOSEW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check EOSEW's competition here
GWH-WT vs FCEL Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 367.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while FCEL trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check FCEL's competition here
GWH-WT vs LTBR Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 323.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while LTBR trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check LTBR's competition here
GWH-WT vs ELVA Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 285.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ELVA trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 66.36. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ELVA's competition here
GWH-WT vs FREY Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to FREY's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check FREY's competition here
GWH-WT vs SKYX Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while SKYX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check SKYX's competition here
GWH-WT vs AIRJ Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 207.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while AIRJ trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check AIRJ's competition here
GWH-WT vs ESP Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 169.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ESP trades at $57.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ESP's competition here
GWH-WT vs EAF Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while EAF trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to EAF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check EAF's competition here
GWH-WT vs ENVXW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ENVXW's competition here
GWH-WT vs NVX Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 127.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while NVX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check NVX's competition here
GWH-WT vs NEOV Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 121.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while NEOV trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check NEOV's competition here
GWH-WT vs SVT Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check SVT's competition here
GWH-WT vs TGEN Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while TGEN trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check TGEN's competition here
GWH-WT vs RFIL Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while RFIL trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 937.00. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check RFIL's competition here
GWH-WT vs ULBI Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 96.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ULBI trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 58.10. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ULBI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ULBI's competition here
GWH-WT vs CBAT Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while CBAT trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check CBAT's competition here
GWH-WT vs OPTT Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while OPTT trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check OPTT's competition here
GWH-WT vs SLDPW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while SLDPW trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check SLDPW's competition here
GWH-WT vs SES-WT Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while SES-WT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check SES-WT's competition here
GWH-WT vs CHEV Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while CHEV trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -500.00. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to CHEV's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check CHEV's competition here
GWH-WT vs NEOVW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while NEOVW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check NEOVW's competition here
GWH-WT vs PPSI Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while PPSI trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to PPSI's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check PPSI's competition here
GWH-WT vs ADSEW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ADSEW trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ADSEW's competition here
GWH-WT vs OESX Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while OESX trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check OESX's competition here
GWH-WT vs GCDT Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while GCDT trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -60.83. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check GCDT's competition here
GWH-WT vs APWC Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while APWC trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check APWC's competition here
GWH-WT vs SDST Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while SDST trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to SDST's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check SDST's competition here
GWH-WT vs IPWR Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while IPWR trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check IPWR's competition here
GWH-WT vs FLUX Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while FLUX trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +3.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check FLUX's competition here
GWH-WT vs GWH Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while GWH trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to GWH's ROE of -5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check GWH's competition here
GWH-WT vs MVSTW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while MVSTW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check MVSTW's competition here
GWH-WT vs PITA Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check PITA's competition here
GWH-WT vs STI Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while STI trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to STI's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check STI's competition here
GWH-WT vs NXU Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check NXU's competition here
GWH-WT vs ZOOZ Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ZOOZ trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ZOOZ's competition here
GWH-WT vs POLA Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while POLA trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to POLA's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check POLA's competition here
GWH-WT vs XPON Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while XPON trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to XPON's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check XPON's competition here
GWH-WT vs SDSTW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while SDSTW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check SDSTW's competition here
GWH-WT vs DFLI Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while DFLI trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check DFLI's competition here
GWH-WT vs ELPW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ELPW trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ELPW's competition here
GWH-WT vs RAYA Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 775.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while RAYA trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check RAYA's competition here
GWH-WT vs CCTG Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 677.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while CCTG trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check CCTG's competition here
GWH-WT vs DFLIW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 398.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while DFLIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check DFLIW's competition here
GWH-WT vs ZOOZW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 388.4K. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ZOOZW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -6.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ZOOZW's competition here
GWH-WT vs DCFCW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check DCFCW's competition here
GWH-WT vs DCFC Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check DCFC's competition here
GWH-WT vs ENR-PA Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check ENR-PA's competition here
GWH-WT vs BLNKW Comparison February 2026
GWH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWH-WT stands at 15.6M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GWH-WT is priced at $0.04, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWH-WT's ROE is -5.92%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GWH-WT is more volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWH-WT.Check BLNKW's competition here