Ferroglobe PLC

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while RIO trades at $62.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check RIO's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while BHP trades at $55.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check BHP's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while VALE trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check VALE's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while TECK trades at $33.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 96.27. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TECK's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while MP trades at $69.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -110.27. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check MP's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while MTRN trades at $113.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 140.41. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check MTRN's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while TMC trades at $4.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -13.03. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TMC's ROE of -19.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TMC's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while SKE trades at $15.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SKE's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while USAR trades at $15.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to USAR's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USAR's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check STR-WT's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while STR trades at $18.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check STR's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while IPX trades at $41.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -15.84. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IPX's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while VZLA trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -172.25. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check VZLA's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 795M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while CMP trades at $19.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check CMP's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 662.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while SGML trades at $5.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -14.51. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SGML's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 651.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while NEXA trades at $4.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NEXA's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 610.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while LAC trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LAC's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 585.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while USAS trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USAS's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 578.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while CRML trades at $6.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check CRML's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 550.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while SLI trades at $2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SLI's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 546.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while UAMY trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -453.00. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check UAMY's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while LAR trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LAR's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 510.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while USARW trades at $5.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to USARW's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USARW's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 468.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while NAK trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NAK's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NAK's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 465.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while CRMLW trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check CRMLW's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while LAAC trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LAAC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LAAC's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while PLM trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check PLM's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while GRFX trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GRFX's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 365.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while TMCWW trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of -19.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TMCWW's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 350.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while LZM trades at $4.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LZM's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 335.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while EMX trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is 62.06. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check EMX's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 303.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while NB trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NB's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 275.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while NMG trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NMG's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 270.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while TMQ trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -27.42. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TMQ's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while WRN trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -126.50. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check WRN's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 224.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while ABAT trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check ABAT's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 199.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while PLL trades at $9.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check PLL's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while IONR trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -15.38. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IONR's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while USGO trades at $8.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -12.18. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USGO's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while LGO trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LGO's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while FURY trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FURY's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check FURY's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while GRO trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GRO's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while XPL trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check XPL's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while AMLI trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check AMLI's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while WWR trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check WWR's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while LITM trades at $3.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LITM's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while ELBM trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check ELBM's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while GTI trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GTI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GTI's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while BYU trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check BYU's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while GLG trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GLG's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while KMCM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GSM has daily volatility of 5.06 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while SMTS trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SMTS's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while VEDL trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check VEDL's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while BBL trades at $64.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check BBL's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while IFFT trades at $47.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IFFT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IFFT's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 780.1M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.35, while EXN trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of 5.89, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check EXN's competition here