Ferroglobe PLC

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while RIO trades at $62.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check RIO's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while BHP trades at $52.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check BHP's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while VALE trades at $9.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check VALE's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while TECK trades at $33.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 102.24. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TECK's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while MP trades at $64.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -101.78. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check MP's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while TMC trades at $7.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -32.39. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TMC's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while MTRN trades at $93.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 195.69. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check MTRN's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while SKE trades at $14.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SKE's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while STR trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check STR's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while IPX trades at $40.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -15.72. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IPX's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while USAR trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to USAR's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USAR's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while VZLA trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -158.25. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check VZLA's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 850.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while CMP trades at $20.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check CMP's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 784.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while TMCWW trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TMCWW's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 728.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while SGML trades at $6.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -19.85. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SGML's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 662.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while NEXA trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NEXA's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 622.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while USAS trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USAS's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 619.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while LAC trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -12.86. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LAC's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 517.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while SLI trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SLI's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while LAR trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -42.07. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LAR's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 452M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while NAK trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NAK's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while LAAC trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LAAC's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while PLM trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check PLM's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while GRFX trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GRFX's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 400.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while CRML trades at $4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check CRML's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 397.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while UAMY trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -334.00. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check UAMY's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while CRMLW trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check CRMLW's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 370.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while LZM trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LZM's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 332.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while USARW trades at $3.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to USARW's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USARW's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 327.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while EMX trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -101.17. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check EMX's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 304.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while TMQ trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -30.92. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TMQ's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 299.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while NMG trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NMG's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 268.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while ABAT trades at $2.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check ABAT's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 263M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while WRN trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -65.75. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check WRN's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 217.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while NB trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -15.79. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NB's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 179.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while IONR trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -13.86. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IONR's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 170.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while PLL trades at $7.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check PLL's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 103.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while USGO trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USGO's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while LGO trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LGO's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while FURY trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check FURY's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while AMLI trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check AMLI's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while GRO trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GRO's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 64.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while WWR trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check WWR's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while XPL trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -10.54. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check XPL's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while LITM trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LITM's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while ELBM trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check ELBM's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while GTI trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GTI's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while BYU trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check BYU's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check STR-WT's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while GLG trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GLG's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while KMCM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GSM has daily volatility of 3.53 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while SMTS trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SMTS's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while VEDL trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check VEDL's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while BBL trades at $64.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check BBL's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while IFFT trades at $47.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IFFT's competition here

GSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 851M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.56, while EXN trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.83, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check EXN's competition here