Federal Signal Corporation
Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSS | $117.20 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 31.09 | $3.82 | +0.47% |
| VLTO | $93.98 | +0.00% | 23.1B | 24.75 | $3.76 | +0.49% |
| ZWS | $50.91 | +0.00% | 8.5B | 45.42 | $1.12 | +0.79% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $65.05 | +0.08% | 5.3B | 25.88 | $2.50 | +0.33% |
| CECO | $78.24 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 55.09 | $1.43 | N/A |
| PCT | $9.25 | +0.00% | 1.6B | -6.16 | -$1.46 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $9.73 | +0.00% | 1.2B | -14.17 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ERII | $16.05 | +0.00% | 860.3M | 47.76 | $0.34 | N/A |
| CECE | $11.65 | +2.19% | 401M | 58.25 | $0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FSS vs VLTO Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while VLTO trades at $93.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check VLTO's competition here
FSS vs ZWS Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while ZWS trades at $50.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 45.42. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check ZWS's competition here
FSS vs AQUA Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check AQUA's competition here
FSS vs ATMU Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while ATMU trades at $65.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check ATMU's competition here
FSS vs CECO Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while CECO trades at $78.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 55.09. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check CECO's competition here
FSS vs PCT Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while PCT trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check PCT's competition here
FSS vs PCTTU Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while PCTTU trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check PCTTU's competition here
FSS vs ERII Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 860.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while ERII trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 47.76. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check ERII's competition here
FSS vs CECE Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check CECE's competition here
FSS vs ARQ Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 147.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while ARQ trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -38.44. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check ARQ's competition here
FSS vs ADES Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADES's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check ADES's competition here
FSS vs PCTTW Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while PCTTW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check PCTTW's competition here
FSS vs ZONE Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while ZONE trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check ZONE's competition here
FSS vs FTEK Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while FTEK trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check FTEK's competition here
FSS vs SCWO Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while SCWO trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check SCWO's competition here
FSS vs CLIR Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while CLIR trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check CLIR's competition here
FSS vs BHTG Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check BHTG's competition here
FSS vs LIQT Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while LIQT trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check LIQT's competition here
FSS vs TOMZ Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while TOMZ trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check TOMZ's competition here
FSS vs CLWT Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while CLWT trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check CLWT's competition here
FSS vs DEVS Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while DEVS trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check DEVS's competition here
FSS vs MKUL Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check MKUL's competition here
FSS vs RAINW Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while RAINW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check RAINW's competition here
FSS vs SPECW Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check SPECW's competition here
FSS vs SPEC Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check SPEC's competition here
FSS vs AERC Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check AERC's competition here
FSS vs NEWA Comparison February 2026
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $117.20, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.Check NEWA's competition here