Federal Signal Corporation
Federal Signal Corporation FSS Peers
See (FSS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSS | $93.91 | -0.11% | 5.7B | 27.54 | $3.41 | +0.55% |
| VLTO | $101.24 | +0.47% | 25.1B | 28.92 | $3.50 | +0.40% |
| ZWS | $36.50 | +0.69% | 6.1B | 38.02 | $0.96 | +0.96% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $36.13 | -0.73% | 3B | 16.27 | $2.22 | +0.42% |
| PCTTU | $11.94 | +7.37% | 1.8B | -19.17 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| PCT | $9.75 | -4.88% | 1.8B | -8.26 | -$1.18 | N/A |
| CECO | $27.34 | -3.15% | 964.2M | 21.03 | $1.30 | N/A |
| ERII | $12.38 | -0.04% | 674.7M | 34.39 | $0.36 | N/A |
| PCTTW | $2.70 | -4.93% | 484.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FSS vs VLTO Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while VLTO trades at $101.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs ZWS Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while ZWS trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 38.02. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs AQUA Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs ATMU Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while ATMU trades at $36.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs PCTTU Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while PCTTU trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -19.17. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs PCT Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while PCT trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -8.26. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PCT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs CECO Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 964.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while CECO trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs ERII Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 674.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while ERII trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs PCTTW Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 484.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while PCTTW trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs CECE Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs ARQ Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 214.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while ARQ trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -101.80. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs ADES Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs SCWO Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while SCWO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs FTEK Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while FTEK trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -19.89. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs CLIR Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while CLIR trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs BHTG Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs TOMZ Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while TOMZ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs ZONE Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while ZONE trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -19.30. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs LIQT Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while LIQT trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs DEVS Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while DEVS trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs CLWT Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while CLWT trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs MKUL Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs RAINW Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while RAINW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs SPECW Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs SPEC Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 20.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is more volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs NEWA Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.
FSS vs AERC Comparison
FSS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSS stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSS is priced at $93.91, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSS is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSS.