Federal Realty Investment Trust
Federal Realty Investment Trust FRT Peers
See (FRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRT | $96.74 | +1.60% | 8.34B | 27.80 | $3.48 | +4.61% |
| SPG | $162.97 | +1.11% | 53.17B | 25.99 | $6.27 | +5.11% |
| SPG-PJ | $58.17 | -2.24% | 51.34B | 8.58 | $6.78 | +5.11% |
| O | $55.40 | +1.58% | 50.03B | 50.36 | $1.10 | +5.81% |
| KIM-PN | $58.20 | -1.26% | 39.24B | N/A | N/A | +6.15% |
| KIM-PM | $20.34 | +0.54% | 14.49B | 12.36 | $1.65 | +4.63% |
| KIM | $21.38 | +1.33% | 14.46B | 28.13 | $0.76 | +4.63% |
| KIM-PL | $19.93 | +0.58% | 14.29B | 12.11 | $1.65 | +4.63% |
| REG | $72.59 | +0.54% | 13.18B | 34.40 | $2.11 | +3.80% |
| FRT-PC | $20.49 | -0.10% | 8.42B | 6.24 | $3.29 | +4.61% |
Stock Comparison
FRT vs SPG Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 53.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while SPG trades at $162.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPG's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs SPG-PJ Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 51.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while SPG-PJ trades at $58.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs O Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, O has a market cap of 50.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while O trades at $55.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas O's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs KIM-PN Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 39.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while KIM-PN trades at $58.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs KIM-PM Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 14.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while KIM-PM trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs KIM Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 14.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while KIM trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs KIM-PL Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 14.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while KIM-PL trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs REG Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 13.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while REG trades at $72.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 34.40. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs FRT-PC Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while FRT-PC trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs ADC Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 8.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while ADC trades at $73.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 41.76. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs BRX Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 8.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while BRX trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs NNN Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 7.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while NNN trades at $41.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs KRG Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while KRG trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 327.14. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs PECO Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while PECO trades at $35.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 61.88. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs REGCP Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while REGCP trades at $23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs REGCO Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while REGCO trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs MAC Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while MAC trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -32.41. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs SKT Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 3.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while SKT trades at $31.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 36.30. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs FCPT Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while FCPT trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs AKR Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while AKR trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 118.24. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs CURB Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while CURB trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 195.83. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs ROIC Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs IVT Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while IVT trades at $28.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 117.88. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs ADC-PA Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while ADC-PA trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs GTY Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while GTY trades at $28.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs NTST Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while NTST trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is -104.87. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs ALX Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while ALX trades at $220.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs RPT-PD Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs UBP Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs UBA Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs UBP-PK Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs BFS-PD Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 812.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while BFS-PD trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs BFS Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 808.80M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while BFS trades at $33.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs CBL Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 787.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while CBL trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs SITC Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 699.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while SITC trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs UBP-PH Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs WSR Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 646.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while WSR trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs BFS-PE Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 504.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while BFS-PE trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs SITC-PA Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 372.97M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs CDR-PB Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 217.30M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while CDR-PB trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs PINE Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 214.71M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while PINE trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is 188.13. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs CDR-PC Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 200.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while CDR-PC trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs SRG Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 165.59M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while SRG trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs SRG-PA Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 162.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while SRG-PA trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs WHLRP Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 4.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while WHLRP trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs WHLRD Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 4.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while WHLRD trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -18.20. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs WHLR Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 3.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while WHLR trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WHLR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.
FRT vs WHLRL Comparison
FRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRT stands at 8.34B. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 1.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FRT is priced at $96.74, while WHLRL trades at $183.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.80, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -98.16. In terms of profitability, FRT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRT is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRT.