BingEx Limited
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FLX
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FLX
BingEx Limited (FLX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLX | $2.46 | -6.11% | 57.8M | 10.91 | $0.23 | N/A |
| FDX | $358.94 | -0.10% | 86.3B | 19.31 | $18.73 | +1.60% |
| UPS | $97.52 | -0.40% | 83.4B | 14.97 | $6.56 | +6.68% |
| XPO | $199.02 | +0.30% | 23.5B | 75.95 | $2.64 | N/A |
| JBHT | $214.01 | +0.27% | 20.5B | 35.06 | $6.13 | +0.82% |
| CHRW | $167.98 | -0.31% | 19.9B | 34.75 | $4.83 | +1.49% |
| ZTO | $25.08 | +1.11% | 19.9B | 15.40 | $1.62 | +2.57% |
| EXPD | $145.39 | +0.75% | 19.5B | 24.51 | $5.95 | +1.06% |
| GXO | $52.74 | -1.39% | 6.1B | 189.57 | $0.28 | N/A |
| LSTR | $163.58 | +1.24% | 5.6B | 49.33 | $3.31 | +2.20% |
Stock Comparison
FLX vs FDX Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 86.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while FDX trades at $358.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check FDX's competition here
FLX vs UPS Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while UPS trades at $97.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check UPS's competition here
FLX vs XPO Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while XPO trades at $199.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 75.95. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check XPO's competition here
FLX vs JBHT Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while JBHT trades at $214.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 35.06. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check JBHT's competition here
FLX vs CHRW Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while CHRW trades at $167.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CHRW's competition here
FLX vs ZTO Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while ZTO trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ZTO's competition here
FLX vs EXPD Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while EXPD trades at $145.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check EXPD's competition here
FLX vs GXO Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while GXO trades at $52.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 189.57. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check GXO's competition here
FLX vs LSTR Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while LSTR trades at $163.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 49.33. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check LSTR's competition here
FLX vs HUBG Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while HUBG trades at $36.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check HUBG's competition here
FLX vs PBI Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while PBI trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PBI's competition here
FLX vs FWRD Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 549.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while FWRD trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check FWRD's competition here
FLX vs CYRX Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 439.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while CYRX trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CYRX's competition here
FLX vs RLGT Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 340.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while RLGT trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check RLGT's competition here
FLX vs PAL Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 186.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while PAL trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PAL's competition here
FLX vs SINO Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SINO's competition here
FLX vs CRGO Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 88.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while CRGO trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CRGO's competition here
FLX vs SFWL Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while SFWL trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SFWL's competition here
FLX vs AIRT Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while AIRT trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRT's competition here
FLX vs AIRTP Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while AIRTP trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 57.31. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRTP's competition here
FLX vs NCEW Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while NCEW trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check NCEW's competition here
FLX vs PSIG Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while PSIG trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PSIG's competition here
FLX vs BTOC Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while BTOC trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check BTOC's competition here
FLX vs ELOG Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while ELOG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ELOG's competition here
FLX vs JYD Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while JYD trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JYD's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check JYD's competition here
FLX vs CRGOW Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while CRGOW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CRGOW's competition here
FLX vs LSH Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while LSH trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check LSH's competition here
FLX vs CJMB Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while CJMB trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CJMB's competition here
FLX vs GVH Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while GVH trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check GVH's competition here
FLX vs ATXG Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while ATXG trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ATXG's competition here
FLX vs SGLY Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while SGLY trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SGLY's competition here
FLX vs UTIW Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, UTIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while UTIW trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas UTIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UTIW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to UTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check UTIW's competition here
FLX vs ECHO Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ECHO's competition here
FLX vs AIRTW Comparison April 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 57.8M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.46, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRTW's competition here