BingEx Limited

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while UPS trades at $115.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check UPS's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while FDX trades at $383.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check FDX's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while XPO trades at $203.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 76.23. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check XPO's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while JBHT trades at $225.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 36.29. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check JBHT's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while CHRW trades at $185.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CHRW's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while EXPD trades at $150.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check EXPD's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while ZTO trades at $25.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ZTO's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while GXO trades at $64.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 225.61. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check GXO's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while LSTR trades at $150.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check LSTR's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while HUBG trades at $41.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check HUBG's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while PBI trades at $10.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PBI's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 790M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while FWRD trades at $27.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check FWRD's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 407.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while CYRX trades at $8.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CYRX's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 336.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while RLGT trades at $7.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check RLGT's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while PAL trades at $7.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PAL's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while SINO trades at $4.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SINO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SINO's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while CRGO trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CRGO's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while SFWL trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SFWL's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while AIRTP trades at $20.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 60.54. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRTP's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while AIRT trades at $24.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -9.22. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRT's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while NCEW trades at $7.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check NCEW's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while PSIG trades at $5.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PSIG's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while BTOC trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check BTOC's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while ELOG trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ELOG's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while CRGOW trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CRGOW's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while JYD trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check JYD's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while LSH trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check LSH's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while CJMB trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CJMB's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while ATXG trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ATXG's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while SGLY trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SGLY's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while GVH trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check GVH's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRTW's competition here

FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 55.7M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.42, while ECHO trades at $48.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.62, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ECHO's competition here