Fifth Third Bancorp
Fifth Third Bancorp FITBI Peers
See (FITBI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITBI | $25.39 | +0.04% | 16.95B | 7.29 | $3.48 | +3.71% |
| HDB | $71.66 | -1.01% | 182.87B | 22.12 | $3.24 | +0.83% |
| PNC | $177.84 | +0.17% | 70.35B | 12.57 | $14.15 | +3.60% |
| USB-PH | $20.91 | +0.82% | 69.93B | 4.51 | $4.64 | +4.51% |
| USB-PP | $22.55 | -0.66% | 68.98B | 4.86 | $4.64 | +4.51% |
| USB | $44.22 | -0.34% | 68.90B | 10.95 | $4.04 | +4.51% |
| USB-PS | $18.43 | -1.18% | 68.22B | N/A | N/A | +4.51% |
| USB-PA | $841.50 | -0.54% | 68.20B | 239.74 | $3.51 | +4.51% |
| MFG | $5.25 | +1.55% | 65.87B | 10.94 | $0.48 | +1.22% |
| ITUB | $6.64 | +0.23% | 65.78B | 9.90 | $0.67 | +7.25% |
Stock Comparison
FITBI vs HDB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 182.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while HDB trades at $71.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs PNC Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 70.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while PNC trades at $177.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs USB-PH Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 69.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while USB-PH trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs USB-PP Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.98B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while USB-PP trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs USB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 68.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while USB trades at $44.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs USB-PS Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 68.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while USB-PS trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs USB-PA Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 68.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while USB-PA trades at $841.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 239.74. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs MFG Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 65.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while MFG trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs ITUB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 65.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while ITUB trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs LYG Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 59.72B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while LYG trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs IBN Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 59.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while IBN trades at $33.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs TFC Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 53.98B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while TFC trades at $41.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -216.95. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs DB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 53.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while DB trades at $27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs BSBR Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 40.43B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while BSBR trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs HBANL Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while HBANL trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs HBANM Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 33.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while HBANM trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs TFC-PI Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 31.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while TFC-PI trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs MTB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 29.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while MTB trades at $185.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs TFC-PO Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while TFC-PO trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs BBDO Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 26.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while BBDO trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FITB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 26.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FITB trades at $39.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FCNCP Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 26.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FCNCP trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs BBD Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 26.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while BBD trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FCNCO Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 25.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FCNCO trades at $22.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs USB-PR Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while USB-PR trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs HBANP Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while HBANP trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs KB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 25.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while KB trades at $67.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FCNCA Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FCNCA trades at $1,962.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs TFC-PR Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while TFC-PR trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs USB-PQ Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while USB-PQ trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs HBAN Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 23.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while HBAN trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs RF-PF Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while RF-PF trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI and RF-PF have similar daily volatility (0.24).
FITBI vs RF Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 20.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while RF trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs RF-PC Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 19.79B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while RF-PC trades at $23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs KEY-PL Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 18.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while KEY-PL trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs KEY-PK Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 18.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while KEY-PK trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs KEY Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 18.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while KEY trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -87.24. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs KEY-PJ Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 18.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs KEY-PI Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 18.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while KEY-PI trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs CFG Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 18.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while CFG trades at $41.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs BAP Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 16.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while BAP trades at $207.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FITBP Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FITBP trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs BCH Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 16.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while BCH trades at $31.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs SHG Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 15.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while SHG trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs RF-PE Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while RF-PE trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs CFG-PD Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FITBO Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FITBO trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FHN-PB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FHN-PB trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FHN-PC Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FHN-PC trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs CFG-PH Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while CFG-PH trades at $26.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FHN-PE Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FHN-PE trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs CIB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 10.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while CIB trades at $42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs GGAL Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 10.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while GGAL trades at $62.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FHN Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FHN trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs WF Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 9.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while WF trades at $38.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs SSB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while SSB trades at $91.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs WBS Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 8.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while WBS trades at $53.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FHN-PD Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FHN-PF Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FHN-PF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs WAL Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while WAL trades at $79.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs CBSH Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while CBSH trades at $65.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs PNFP Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while PNFP trades at $111.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs CFR Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while CFR trades at $130.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs ONB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while ONB trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs CFG-PE Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while CFG-PE trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs ONBPO Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 8.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while ONBPO trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs WTFC Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while WTFC trades at $122.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs ONBPP Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 8.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while ONBPP trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs WTFCM Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 8.15B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while WTFCM trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs UMBF Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while UMBF trades at $106.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs CMA Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while CMA trades at $58.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs BSMX Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs ZION Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while ZION trades at $49.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs BPOP Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while BPOP trades at $104.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs SNV Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while SNV trades at $49.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs PB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while PB trades at $72.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs SNV-PD Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while SNV-PD trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs BOKF Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while BOKF trades at $98.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs BMA Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 6.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while BMA trades at $94.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs CADE Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while CADE trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs HOMB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while HOMB trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs COLB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while COLB trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs OZK Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while OZK trades at $46.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs UBSI Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while UBSI trades at $37.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs BXS Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FNB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FNB trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs VLYPO Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while VLYPO trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs VLY Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while VLY trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FLG Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FLG trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs FFIN Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while FFIN trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs VLYPP Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while VLYPP trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs GBCI Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 4.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while GBCI trades at $43.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs HWC Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 4.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while HWC trades at $57.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs HWCPZ Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while HWCPZ trades at $24.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs BBAR Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, BBAR has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while BBAR trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas BBAR's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to BBAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs AUB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.43B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while AUB trades at $31.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs NYCB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, NYCB has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while NYCB trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas NYCB's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYCB's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to NYCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs ABCB Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while ABCB trades at $63.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.
FITBI vs BANF Comparison
FITBI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FITBI stands at 16.95B. In comparison, BANF has a market cap of 4.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FITBI is priced at $25.39, while BANF trades at $127.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FITBI currently has a P/E ratio of 7.29, whereas BANF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, FITBI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FITBI is less volatile compared to BANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FITBI.