First Citizens BancShares, Inc.
First Citizens BancShares, Inc. (FCNCO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FCNCO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCNCO | $22.63 | -0.88% | 27.3B | 0.39 | $57.47 | +0.36% |
| HDB | $76.78 | -1.36% | 196.3B | 25.25 | $3.04 | +0.85% |
| IBN | $33.84 | -0.76% | 121.1B | 19.91 | $1.70 | +0.70% |
| PNC | $193.97 | -1.06% | 76.7B | 13.26 | $14.63 | +3.32% |
| MFG | $5.94 | -3.96% | 74.7B | 12.40 | $0.48 | +2.17% |
| USB-PA | $827.00 | +0.12% | 72.3B | 235.61 | $3.51 | +4.32% |
| USB-PS | $18.68 | -0.10% | 72.1B | N/A | N/A | +4.32% |
| USB-PP | $22.70 | -0.26% | 72B | 4.89 | $4.64 | +4.32% |
| USB | $46.09 | -0.50% | 71.8B | 11.03 | $4.18 | +4.32% |
| USB-PH | $20.54 | -0.53% | 71.8B | 4.43 | $4.64 | +4.32% |
Stock Comparison
FCNCO vs HDB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 196.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while HDB trades at $76.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HDB's competition here
FCNCO vs IBN Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 121.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while IBN trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check IBN's competition here
FCNCO vs PNC Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while PNC trades at $193.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check PNC's competition here
FCNCO vs MFG Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while MFG trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check MFG's competition here
FCNCO vs USB-PA Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while USB-PA trades at $827.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 235.61. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB-PA's competition here
FCNCO vs USB-PS Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while USB-PS trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB-PS's competition here
FCNCO vs USB-PP Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while USB-PP trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB-PP's competition here
FCNCO vs USB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while USB trades at $46.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB's competition here
FCNCO vs USB-PH Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while USB-PH trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB-PH's competition here
FCNCO vs LYG Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while LYG trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check LYG's competition here
FCNCO vs ITUB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while ITUB trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check ITUB's competition here
FCNCO vs DB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while DB trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check DB's competition here
FCNCO vs TFC Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while TFC trades at $45.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check TFC's competition here
FCNCO vs HBANL Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while HBANL trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HBANL's competition here
FCNCO vs BSBR Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while BSBR trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BSBR's competition here
FCNCO vs HBANM Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while HBANM trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HBANM's competition here
FCNCO vs MTB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while MTB trades at $194.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check MTB's competition here
FCNCO vs KB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while KB trades at $78.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check KB's competition here
FCNCO vs FITB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FITB trades at $42.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FITB's competition here
FCNCO vs TFC-PO Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while TFC-PO trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check TFC-PO's competition here
FCNCO vs FCNCP Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FCNCP trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FCNCP's competition here
FCNCO vs KEY-PL Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while KEY-PL trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check KEY-PL's competition here
FCNCO vs TFC-PI Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while TFC-PI trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check TFC-PI's competition here
FCNCO vs HBANP Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while HBANP trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HBANP's competition here
FCNCO vs USB-PR Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while USB-PR trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB-PR's competition here
FCNCO vs FCNCA Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FCNCA trades at $2,050.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FCNCA's competition here
FCNCO vs TFC-PR Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while TFC-PR trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check TFC-PR's competition here
FCNCO vs HBAN Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while HBAN trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HBAN's competition here
FCNCO vs SHG Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while SHG trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check SHG's competition here
FCNCO vs RF-PC Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while RF-PC trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check RF-PC's competition here
FCNCO vs USB-PQ Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while USB-PQ trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB-PQ's competition here
FCNCO vs RF Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while RF trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check RF's competition here
FCNCO vs RF-PF Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while RF-PF trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check RF-PF's competition here
FCNCO vs CFG Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while CFG trades at $49.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CFG's competition here
FCNCO vs KEY-PI Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while KEY-PI trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check KEY-PI's competition here
FCNCO vs KEY-PJ Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
FCNCO vs KEY-PK Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while KEY-PK trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check KEY-PK's competition here
FCNCO vs KEY Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while KEY trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -230.37. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check KEY's competition here
FCNCO vs BAP Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while BAP trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BAP's competition here
FCNCO vs FITBI Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FITBI trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FITBI's competition here
FCNCO vs FITBP Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FITBP trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FITBP's competition here
FCNCO vs RF-PE Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while RF-PE trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check RF-PE's competition here
FCNCO vs CFG-PD Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CFG-PD's competition here
FCNCO vs BBD Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while BBD trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BBD's competition here
FCNCO vs VLYPN Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while VLYPN trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check VLYPN's competition here
FCNCO vs BCH Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while BCH trades at $27.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BCH's competition here
FCNCO vs FITBO Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FITBO trades at $19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FITBO's competition here
FCNCO vs WF Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while WF trades at $52.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check WF's competition here
FCNCO vs BBDO Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while BBDO trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BBDO's competition here
FCNCO vs FHN-PC Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FHN-PC trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FHN-PC's competition here
FCNCO vs FHN-PB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FHN-PB trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FHN-PB's competition here
FCNCO vs FHN-PE Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FHN-PE trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FHN-PE's competition here
FCNCO vs CFG-PH Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while CFG-PH trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CFG-PH's competition here
FCNCO vs FHN Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FHN trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FHN's competition here
FCNCO vs CIB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while CIB trades at $43.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CIB's competition here
FCNCO vs BSAC Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while BSAC trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BSAC's competition here
FCNCO vs CUBI-PE Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while CUBI-PE trades at $337.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
FCNCO vs WBS Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while WBS trades at $59.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check WBS's competition here
FCNCO vs SSB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while SSB trades at $97.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check SSB's competition here
FCNCO vs ONBPO Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while ONBPO trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check ONBPO's competition here
FCNCO vs ONBPP Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while ONBPP trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check ONBPP's competition here
FCNCO vs CMA Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while CMA trades at $69.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CMA's competition here
FCNCO vs FHN-PF Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FHN-PF trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FHN-PF's competition here
FCNCO vs WAL Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while WAL trades at $80.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check WAL's competition here
FCNCO vs FHN-PD Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FHN-PD's competition here
FCNCO vs WTFC Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while WTFC trades at $132.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check WTFC's competition here
FCNCO vs CFR Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while CFR trades at $135.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CFR's competition here
FCNCO vs CFG-PE Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while CFG-PE trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CFG-PE's competition here
FCNCO vs UMBF Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while UMBF trades at $108.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check UMBF's competition here
FCNCO vs CBSH Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while CBSH trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CBSH's competition here
FCNCO vs GGAL Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while GGAL trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check GGAL's competition here
FCNCO vs ZION Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while ZION trades at $55.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check ZION's competition here
FCNCO vs ONB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while ONB trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check ONB's competition here
FCNCO vs BPOP Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while BPOP trades at $115.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BPOP's competition here
FCNCO vs BSMX Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BSMX's competition here
FCNCO vs PNFP Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while PNFP trades at $91.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check PNFP's competition here
FCNCO vs SNV-PD Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while SNV-PD trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check SNV-PD's competition here
FCNCO vs SNV Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while SNV trades at $48.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check SNV's competition here
FCNCO vs BOKF Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while BOKF trades at $104.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BOKF's competition here
FCNCO vs CADE Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while CADE trades at $36.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CADE's competition here
FCNCO vs PB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while PB trades at $67.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check PB's competition here
FCNCO vs OZK Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while OZK trades at $50.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check OZK's competition here
FCNCO vs HOMB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while HOMB trades at $28.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HOMB's competition here
FCNCO vs FNB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FNB trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FNB's competition here
FCNCO vs VLY Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while VLY trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check VLY's competition here
FCNCO vs VLYPP Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while VLYPP trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check VLYPP's competition here
FCNCO vs VLYPO Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while VLYPO trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check VLYPO's competition here
FCNCO vs GBCI Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while GBCI trades at $46.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check GBCI's competition here
FCNCO vs BXS Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BXS's competition here
FCNCO vs UBSI Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while UBSI trades at $36.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check UBSI's competition here
FCNCO vs FFIN Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FFIN trades at $36.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FFIN's competition here
FCNCO vs HWC Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while HWC trades at $60.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HWC's competition here
FCNCO vs HWCPZ Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while HWCPZ trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HWCPZ's competition here
FCNCO vs COLB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while COLB trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check COLB's competition here
FCNCO vs AX Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while AX trades at $85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check AX's competition here
FCNCO vs AUBAP Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, AUBAP has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while AUBAP trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas AUBAP's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUBAP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to AUBAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check AUBAP's competition here
FCNCO vs FLG Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while FLG trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FLG's competition here
FCNCO vs AUB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while AUB trades at $32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check AUB's competition here
FCNCO vs ABCB Comparison July 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $22.63, while ABCB trades at $66.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check ABCB's competition here