First Citizens BancShares, Inc.
First Citizens BancShares, Inc. (FCNCO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FCNCO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCNCO | $23.60 | -0.17% | 24.3B | 0.41 | $57.47 | +0.38% |
| HDB | $72.81 | -1.59% | 186.3B | 24.12 | $3.02 | +0.18% |
| IBN | $32.33 | -1.19% | 116.1B | 19.14 | $1.69 | +0.79% |
| MFG | $6.56 | -0.61% | 81.9B | 13.66 | $0.48 | +2.39% |
| PNC | $200.70 | -0.49% | 79.1B | 13.73 | $14.62 | +3.23% |
| USB | $48.16 | -0.25% | 75B | 11.52 | $4.18 | +4.15% |
| USB-PP | $23.85 | -0.21% | 74.9B | 5.15 | $4.64 | +4.15% |
| USB-PS | $19.68 | +0.31% | 74.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.15% |
| USB-PH | $20.52 | -0.19% | 73.6B | 4.43 | $4.64 | +4.15% |
| USB-PA | $832.00 | +0.00% | 73.3B | 237.04 | $3.51 | +4.15% |
Stock Comparison
FCNCO vs HDB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 186.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while HDB trades at $72.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HDB's competition here
FCNCO vs IBN Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 116.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while IBN trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check IBN's competition here
FCNCO vs MFG Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while MFG trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check MFG's competition here
FCNCO vs PNC Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while PNC trades at $200.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check PNC's competition here
FCNCO vs USB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while USB trades at $48.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB's competition here
FCNCO vs USB-PP Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while USB-PP trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB-PP's competition here
FCNCO vs USB-PS Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while USB-PS trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB-PS's competition here
FCNCO vs USB-PH Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while USB-PH trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB-PH's competition here
FCNCO vs USB-PA Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while USB-PA trades at $832.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 237.04. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB-PA's competition here
FCNCO vs DB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while DB trades at $36.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check DB's competition here
FCNCO vs LYG Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while LYG trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check LYG's competition here
FCNCO vs ITUB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while ITUB trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check ITUB's competition here
FCNCO vs TFC Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while TFC trades at $45.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check TFC's competition here
FCNCO vs BSBR Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while BSBR trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BSBR's competition here
FCNCO vs HBANL Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while HBANL trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HBANL's competition here
FCNCO vs HBANM Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while HBANM trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HBANM's competition here
FCNCO vs BBD Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while BBD trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BBD's competition here
FCNCO vs MTB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while MTB trades at $197.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check MTB's competition here
FCNCO vs FITB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FITB trades at $44.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FITB's competition here
FCNCO vs KB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while KB trades at $78.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check KB's competition here
FCNCO vs TFC-PO Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while TFC-PO trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check TFC-PO's competition here
FCNCO vs BBDO Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while BBDO trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BBDO's competition here
FCNCO vs KEY-PL Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while KEY-PL trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check KEY-PL's competition here
FCNCO vs TFC-PI Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while TFC-PI trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check TFC-PI's competition here
FCNCO vs HBANP Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while HBANP trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HBANP's competition here
FCNCO vs USB-PR Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while USB-PR trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB-PR's competition here
FCNCO vs TFC-PR Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while TFC-PR trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check TFC-PR's competition here
FCNCO vs HBAN Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while HBAN trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HBAN's competition here
FCNCO vs FCNCA Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FCNCA trades at $1,968.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FCNCA's competition here
FCNCO vs USB-PQ Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while USB-PQ trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check USB-PQ's competition here
FCNCO vs FCNCP Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FCNCP trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FCNCP's competition here
FCNCO vs RF Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while RF trades at $26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check RF's competition here
FCNCO vs SHG Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while SHG trades at $47.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check SHG's competition here
FCNCO vs RF-PF Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while RF-PF trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check RF-PF's competition here
FCNCO vs RF-PC Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while RF-PC trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check RF-PC's competition here
FCNCO vs CFG Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while CFG trades at $50.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CFG's competition here
FCNCO vs KEY Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while KEY trades at $19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -237.69. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check KEY's competition here
FCNCO vs KEY-PJ Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while KEY-PJ trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
FCNCO vs KEY-PI Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while KEY-PI trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check KEY-PI's competition here
FCNCO vs BAP Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while BAP trades at $252.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BAP's competition here
FCNCO vs KEY-PK Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while KEY-PK trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check KEY-PK's competition here
FCNCO vs FITBI Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FITBI trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FITBI's competition here
FCNCO vs RF-PE Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while RF-PE trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check RF-PE's competition here
FCNCO vs FITBP Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FITBP trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FITBP's competition here
FCNCO vs CFG-PD Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CFG-PD's competition here
FCNCO vs VLYPN Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while VLYPN trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check VLYPN's competition here
FCNCO vs BCH Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while BCH trades at $28.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BCH's competition here
FCNCO vs FITBO Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FITBO trades at $20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FITBO's competition here
FCNCO vs WF Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while WF trades at $53.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check WF's competition here
FCNCO vs FHN-PC Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FHN-PC trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FHN-PC's competition here
FCNCO vs FHN-PB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FHN-PB's competition here
FCNCO vs CFG-PH Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while CFG-PH trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CFG-PH's competition here
FCNCO vs FHN-PE Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FHN-PE trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FHN-PE's competition here
FCNCO vs CUBI-PE Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while CUBI-PE trades at $381.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
FCNCO vs CIB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while CIB trades at $49.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CIB's competition here
FCNCO vs FHN Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FHN trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FHN's competition here
FCNCO vs BSAC Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while BSAC trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BSAC's competition here
FCNCO vs WBS Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while WBS trades at $61.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check WBS's competition here
FCNCO vs SSB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while SSB trades at $99.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check SSB's competition here
FCNCO vs WAL Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while WAL trades at $86.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check WAL's competition here
FCNCO vs FHN-PF Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FHN-PF trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FHN-PF's competition here
FCNCO vs UMBF Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while UMBF trades at $120.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check UMBF's competition here
FCNCO vs WTFC Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while WTFC trades at $134.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check WTFC's competition here
FCNCO vs FHN-PD Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FHN-PD's competition here
FCNCO vs ONB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while ONB trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check ONB's competition here
FCNCO vs CMA Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while CMA trades at $68.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CMA's competition here
FCNCO vs CFG-PE Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while CFG-PE trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CFG-PE's competition here
FCNCO vs CFR Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while CFR trades at $130.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CFR's competition here
FCNCO vs BPOP Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while BPOP trades at $122.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BPOP's competition here
FCNCO vs CBSH Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while CBSH trades at $62.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CBSH's competition here
FCNCO vs ONBPP Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while ONBPP trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check ONBPP's competition here
FCNCO vs ZION Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while ZION trades at $55.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check ZION's competition here
FCNCO vs ONBPO Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while ONBPO trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check ONBPO's competition here
FCNCO vs PNFP Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while PNFP trades at $96.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check PNFP's competition here
FCNCO vs BSMX Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BSMX's competition here
FCNCO vs SNV Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while SNV trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check SNV's competition here
FCNCO vs BOKF Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while BOKF trades at $110.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BOKF's competition here
FCNCO vs SNV-PD Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while SNV-PD trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check SNV-PD's competition here
FCNCO vs CADE Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while CADE trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check CADE's competition here
FCNCO vs GGAL Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while GGAL trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check GGAL's competition here
FCNCO vs PB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while PB trades at $69.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check PB's competition here
FCNCO vs FNB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FNB trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FNB's competition here
FCNCO vs OZK Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while OZK trades at $51.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check OZK's competition here
FCNCO vs HOMB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while HOMB trades at $29.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HOMB's competition here
FCNCO vs VLY Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while VLY trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check VLY's competition here
FCNCO vs GBCI Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while GBCI trades at $48.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check GBCI's competition here
FCNCO vs COLB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while COLB trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check COLB's competition here
FCNCO vs VLYPO Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while VLYPO trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check VLYPO's competition here
FCNCO vs VLYPP Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while VLYPP trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check VLYPP's competition here
FCNCO vs UBSI Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while UBSI trades at $38.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check UBSI's competition here
FCNCO vs HWC Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while HWC trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HWC's competition here
FCNCO vs FFIN Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FFIN trades at $36.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FFIN's competition here
FCNCO vs BXS Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check BXS's competition here
FCNCO vs FLG Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while FLG trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check FLG's competition here
FCNCO vs HWCPZ Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while HWCPZ trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check HWCPZ's competition here
FCNCO vs AX Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while AX trades at $90.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check AX's competition here
FCNCO vs NYCB-PA Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, NYCB-PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while NYCB-PA trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas NYCB-PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NYCB-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is less volatile compared to NYCB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check NYCB-PA's competition here
FCNCO vs AUB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while AUB trades at $34.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check AUB's competition here
FCNCO vs ABCB Comparison August 2025
FCNCO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCNCO stands at 24.3B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCNCO is priced at $23.60, while ABCB trades at $71.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCNCO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, FCNCO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCNCO is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCNCO.Check ABCB's competition here