Energy Transfer LP
Energy Transfer LP ET Peers
See (ET) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET | $17.43 | +1.29% | 59.82B | 13.21 | $1.32 | +7.41% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.25B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +7.41% |
| EP-PC | $48.87 | +0.35% | 108.59B | N/A | N/A | +4.86% |
| ENB | $44.55 | -3.36% | 97.08B | 26.36 | $1.69 | +6.01% |
| WMB | $57.13 | -0.92% | 69.76B | 30.72 | $1.86 | +3.38% |
| EPD | $31.41 | +0.95% | 68.11B | 11.76 | $2.67 | +6.73% |
| KMI | $27.31 | +0.04% | 60.68B | 23.54 | $1.16 | +4.25% |
| OKE | $85.06 | +3.35% | 53.13B | 16.61 | $5.12 | +4.76% |
| LNG | $230.39 | -1.46% | 51.33B | 16.21 | $14.21 | +0.84% |
| ET-PC | $25.57 | -0.08% | 50.15B | 23.81 | $1.07 | +7.41% |
Stock Comparison
ET vs ET-PE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs EP-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 108.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while EP-PC trades at $48.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 97.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while ENB trades at $44.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs WMB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 69.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while WMB trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs EPD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 68.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while EPD trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs KMI Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 60.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while KMI trades at $27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs OKE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 53.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while OKE trades at $85.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs LNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 51.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while LNG trades at $230.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ET-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ET-PD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TRP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 50.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while TRP trades at $48.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MPLX Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 49.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while MPLX trades at $48.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENBA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ET-PI Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 39.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while ET-PI trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TRGP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 36.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while TRGP trades at $166.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs CQP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 27.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while CQP trades at $57.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CQP's ROE of -18.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs VG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 24.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while VG trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PBA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 21.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while PBA trades at $37.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs WES Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 14.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while WES trades at $38.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MMP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PAA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 12.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while PAA trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DTM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 10.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while DTM trades at $100.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs VNOM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 9.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while VNOM trades at $42.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HESM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while HESM trades at $38.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs AM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while AM trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DCP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DCP-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENLC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ETRN Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while GLNG trades at $37.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 79.06. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs FRO Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while FRO trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PAGP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while PAGP trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 35.42. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs EURN Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs CEQP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs KNTK Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while KNTK trades at $43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 42.52. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HEP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SEAL-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs RTLR Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SEAL-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs STNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while STNG trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DKL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while DKL trades at $38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DKL's ROE of -4.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NSS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs INSW Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while INSW trades at $38.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GEL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while GEL trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DHT Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while DHT trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TRMD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while TRMD trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while GLP trades at $46.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNK Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while TNK trades at $45.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOG-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs FLNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while FLNG trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLP-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs CEQP-P Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP-PE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs LPG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 981.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while LPG trades at $22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NVGS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 944.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while NVGS trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLP-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 872.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while GLP-PB trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TEN-PE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 775.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while TEN-PE trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TK Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 667.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while TK trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs OSG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while OSG trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TEN Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 532.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while TEN trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PBT Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 473.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while PBT trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBT's ROE of +134.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NGL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 434.32M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while NGL trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 415.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.60. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 414.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SMLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMLP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NGL-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 403.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while NGL-PC trades at $20.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NGL-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 403.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while NGL-PB trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 403.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -56.89. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DSSI Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SMC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 354.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while SMC trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SNMP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP-PF Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP-PD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GPP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPP's ROE of -14.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DLNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 135.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while DLNG trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DLNG-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 133.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while DLNG-PB trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DLNG-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 133.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 267.93. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MMLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 118.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while MMLP trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BROG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 114.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while BROG trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BANL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 23.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while BANL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PTLE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 19.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while PTLE trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MARPS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 7.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while MARPS trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs RBNE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 7.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while RBNE trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BROGW Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.82B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61450.00. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.43, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.21, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.