Energy Transfer LP
Energy Transfer LP ET Peers
See (ET) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET | $17.92 | +1.41% | 61.5B | 13.58 | $1.32 | +7.22% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +7.22% |
| EP-PC | $48.98 | -0.39% | 108.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.84% |
| ENB | $46.51 | -0.77% | 101.4B | 23.61 | $1.97 | +4.17% |
| WMB | $60.55 | -0.02% | 73.9B | 32.55 | $1.86 | +3.17% |
| EPD | $31.46 | +1.29% | 68.2B | 11.78 | $2.67 | +6.73% |
| KMI | $28.13 | -0.39% | 62.5B | 24.25 | $1.16 | +4.09% |
| LNG | $243.17 | -0.30% | 53.9B | 17.84 | $13.63 | +0.79% |
| TRP | $50.73 | -1.25% | 52.7B | 17.20 | $2.95 | +5.06% |
| MPLX | $51.35 | +0.10% | 52.4B | 11.86 | $4.33 | +7.24% |
Stock Comparison
ET vs ET-PE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs EP-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while EP-PC trades at $48.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 101.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while ENB trades at $46.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs WMB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while WMB trades at $60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs EPD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while EPD trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs KMI Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while KMI trades at $28.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs LNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while LNG trades at $243.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TRP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while TRP trades at $50.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MPLX Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while MPLX trades at $51.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs OKE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while OKE trades at $81.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ET-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ET-PD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENBA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ET-PI Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while ET-PI trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs VG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while VG trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TRGP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while TRGP trades at $167.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs CQP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while CQP trades at $58.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CQP's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PBA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while PBA trades at $37.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs WES Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while WES trades at $38.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MMP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PAA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while PAA trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DTM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while DTM trades at $108.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs VNOM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while VNOM trades at $41.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs AM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while AM trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DCP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HESM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while HESM trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HESM's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DCP-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENLC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ETRN Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while GLNG trades at $41.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 1398.67. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs FRO Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while FRO trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PAGP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while PAGP trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs EURN Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs CEQP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs KNTK Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while KNTK trades at $44.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HEP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DKL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while DKL trades at $42.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DKL's ROE of +584.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SEAL-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs RTLR Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SEAL-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs STNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while STNG trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GEL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while GEL trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NSS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs INSW Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while INSW trades at $37.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while GLP trades at $53.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DHT Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while DHT trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TRMD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while TRMD trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNK Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while TNK trades at $44.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOG-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs FLNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while FLNG trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLP-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs CEQP-P Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP-PE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs LPG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 959.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while LPG trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NVGS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 958.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while NVGS trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DLNG-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 920.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLP-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 873.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while GLP-PB trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TEN-PE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 769.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while TEN-PE trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TK Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 719.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while TK trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs OSG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while OSG trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TEN Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 534.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while TEN trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PBT Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 520.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while PBT trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBT's ROE of +112.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NGL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 499.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while NGL trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NGL-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 443.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while NGL-PC trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NGL-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 440.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while NGL-PB trades at $22.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 419.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while GLOP-PC trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -59.23. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 418.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while GLOP-PB trades at $26.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -59.06. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 417M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while GLOP-PA trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -58.82. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SMLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMLP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DSSI Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SNMP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP-PF Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP-PD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SMC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 306.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while SMC trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GPP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BROG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 207.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while BROG trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 46.40. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DLNG-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 265.83. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DLNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while DLNG trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MMLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 121.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while MMLP trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BANL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while BANL trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MARPS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while MARPS trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PTLE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while PTLE trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs RBNE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while RBNE trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BROGW Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs OMP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, OMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while OMP trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas OMP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OMP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to OMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SHLX Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SHLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while SHLX trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SHLX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHLX's ROE of -56.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SHLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BKEP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BKEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while BKEP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TGP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while TGP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas TGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PBFX Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HMLP-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, HMLP-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while HMLP-PA trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas HMLP-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMLP-PA's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to HMLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PSXP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, PSXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while PSXP trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PSXP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSXP's ROE of -518.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PSXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HMLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, HMLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while HMLP trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas HMLP's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMLP's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to HMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BPMP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BPMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.92, while BPMP trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.