Energy Transfer LP
Energy Transfer LP ET Peers
See (ET) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET | $17.33 | +0.49% | 59.5B | 13.12 | $1.32 | +7.47% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +7.47% |
| EP-PC | $48.98 | +0.16% | 108.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.85% |
| ENB | $45.20 | +1.38% | 98.5B | 22.94 | $1.97 | +5.89% |
| WMB | $57.36 | -0.55% | 70B | 30.84 | $1.86 | +3.40% |
| EPD | $31.33 | +0.55% | 67.9B | 11.72 | $2.67 | +6.77% |
| KMI | $26.97 | -0.52% | 59.9B | 23.24 | $1.16 | +4.28% |
| MPLX | $50.45 | +0.38% | 51.5B | 11.65 | $4.33 | +7.36% |
| OKE | $80.74 | +0.45% | 50.4B | 15.77 | $5.12 | +5.01% |
| ET-PC | $25.57 | -0.08% | 50.1B | 23.81 | $1.07 | +7.47% |
Stock Comparison
ET vs ET-PE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs EP-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while EP-PC trades at $48.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while ENB trades at $45.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs WMB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while WMB trades at $57.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs EPD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while EPD trades at $31.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs KMI Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while KMI trades at $26.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MPLX Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while MPLX trades at $50.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs OKE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while OKE trades at $80.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ET-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ET-PD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TRP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while TRP trades at $47.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs LNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while LNG trades at $222.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENBA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ET-PI Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while ET-PI trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs VG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while VG trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TRGP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while TRGP trades at $162.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs CQP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while CQP trades at $52.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CQP's ROE of -5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PBA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while PBA trades at $37.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs WES Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while WES trades at $39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MMP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PAA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while PAA trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DTM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while DTM trades at $99.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DCP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HESM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while HESM trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HESM's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs AM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while AM trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs VNOM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while VNOM trades at $37.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DCP-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENLC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ETRN Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while GLNG trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 1341.67. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs FRO Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while FRO trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PAGP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while PAGP trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs EURN Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs CEQP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HEP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs KNTK Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while KNTK trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 43.73. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DKL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while DKL trades at $44.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DKL's ROE of +584.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs RTLR Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SEAL-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs STNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while STNG trades at $43.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SEAL-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GEL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while GEL trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NSS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs INSW Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while INSW trades at $38.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while GLP trades at $51.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TRMD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while TRMD trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DHT Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while DHT trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNK Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while TNK trades at $43.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOG-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs FLNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while FLNG trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs LPG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while LPG trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NVGS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while NVGS trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLP-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs CEQP-P Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP-PE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DLNG-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 929.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLP-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 889.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while GLP-PB trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TEN-PE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 783M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while TEN-PE trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TK Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 622.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while TK trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs OSG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while OSG trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PBT Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 589.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while PBT trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBT's ROE of +112.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TEN Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 584.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while TEN trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NGL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 572.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while NGL trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NGL-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 559.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while NGL-PB trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NGL-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 556.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while NGL-PC trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 419.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while GLOP-PB trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -59.20. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 418M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while GLOP-PC trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -58.98. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -58.74. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SMLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMLP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DSSI Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SNMP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP-PF Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP-PD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SMC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 305.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while SMC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GPP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BROG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while BROG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DLNG-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while DLNG-PA trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 272.60. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DLNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while DLNG trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MMLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 112.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while MMLP trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BANL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while BANL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs RBNE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while RBNE trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MARPS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while MARPS trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PTLE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while PTLE trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BROGW Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TGP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, TGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while TGP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SHLX Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, SHLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while SHLX trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SHLX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHLX's ROE of -56.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SHLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PBFX Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PSXP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, PSXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while PSXP trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas PSXP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSXP's ROE of -518.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PSXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HMLP-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, HMLP-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while HMLP-PA trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas HMLP-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMLP-PA's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to HMLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HMLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, HMLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while HMLP trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas HMLP's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMLP's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to HMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BKEP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, BKEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while BKEP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENBL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, ENBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while ENBL trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BKEPP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 59.5B. In comparison, BKEPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $17.33, while BKEPP trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BKEPP's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKEPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to BKEPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.