Energy Transfer LP
Energy Transfer LP ET Peers
See (ET) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET | $18.20 | +0.11% | 62.5B | 13.79 | $1.32 | +7.14% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +7.14% |
| EP-PC | $49.10 | +0.29% | 109.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.87% |
| ENB | $44.78 | -0.67% | 97.6B | 22.73 | $1.97 | +5.96% |
| WMB | $62.67 | -0.32% | 76.5B | 33.69 | $1.86 | +3.10% |
| EPD | $31.06 | -0.10% | 67.3B | 11.63 | $2.67 | +6.85% |
| KMI | $28.98 | +0.31% | 64.4B | 24.98 | $1.16 | +4.00% |
| LNG | $240.00 | -0.86% | 53.3B | 17.62 | $13.63 | +0.81% |
| MPLX | $51.61 | +0.76% | 52.7B | 11.92 | $4.33 | +7.26% |
| TRP | $48.88 | +1.92% | 50.8B | 16.63 | $2.94 | +5.29% |
Stock Comparison
ET vs ET-PE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs EP-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 109.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while EP-PC trades at $49.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while ENB trades at $44.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs WMB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while WMB trades at $62.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs EPD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while EPD trades at $31.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs KMI Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while KMI trades at $28.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs LNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while LNG trades at $240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MPLX Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while MPLX trades at $51.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TRP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while TRP trades at $48.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs OKE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while OKE trades at $81.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ET-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ET-PD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENBA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ET-PI Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while ET-PI trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs VG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while VG trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TRGP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while TRGP trades at $174.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs CQP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while CQP trades at $55.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CQP's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PBA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while PBA trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs WES Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while WES trades at $38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MMP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PAA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while PAA trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DTM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while DTM trades at $108.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs AM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while AM trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DCP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs VNOM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while VNOM trades at $38.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HESM Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while HESM trades at $38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HESM's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DCP-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENLC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ETRN Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while GLNG trades at $41.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 1380.67. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PAGP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while PAGP trades at $19.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs FRO Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while FRO trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs EURN Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs CEQP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs KNTK Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while KNTK trades at $44.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HEP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NS-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DKL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while DKL trades at $43.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DKL's ROE of +584.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SEAL-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SEAL-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs RTLR Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GEL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while GEL trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -10.28. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs STNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while STNG trades at $40.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NSS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs INSW Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while INSW trades at $37.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while GLP trades at $52.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DHT Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while DHT trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TRMD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while TRMD trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNK Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while TNK trades at $42.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOG-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs FLNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while FLNG trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs LPG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while LPG trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLP-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs CEQP-P Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NVGS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while NVGS trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP-PE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DLNG-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 925.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLP-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 877.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while GLP-PB trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TEN-PE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 762.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while TEN-PE trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TK Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 704M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while TK trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs OSG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while OSG trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NGL-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 603.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while NGL-PC trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NGL-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 600.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while NGL-PB trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TEN Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 595M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while TEN trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PBT Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 581.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while PBT trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBT's ROE of +112.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs NGL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 571.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while NGL trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP-PC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -58.41. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP-PB Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 410.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -57.94. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 405.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -57.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SMLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMLP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DSSI Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SNMP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP-PF Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs TNP-PD Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SMC Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 315M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while SMC trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GPP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs GLOP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BROG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while BROG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DLNG Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 133M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while DLNG trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs DLNG-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 129.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 265.42. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MMLP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while MMLP trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BANL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while BANL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PTLE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while PTLE trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs MARPS Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while MARPS trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs RBNE Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while RBNE trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BROGW Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PBFX Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs HMLP-PA Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, HMLP-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while HMLP-PA trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas HMLP-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMLP-PA's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to HMLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs SHLX Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, SHLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while SHLX trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas SHLX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHLX's ROE of -56.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SHLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs PSXP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, PSXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while PSXP trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas PSXP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSXP's ROE of -518.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PSXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs ENBL Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, ENBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while ENBL trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BKEPP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, BKEPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while BKEPP trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas BKEPP's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKEPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to BKEPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BPMP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, BPMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while BPMP trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs OMP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, OMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while OMP trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas OMP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OMP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to OMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.
ET vs BKEP Comparison
ET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 62.5B. In comparison, BKEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $18.20, while BKEP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.79, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.