Energy Transfer LP

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 108.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while EP-PC trades at $49.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, EBBNF has a market cap of 103.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while EBBNF trades at $22.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas EBBNF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBBNF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to EBBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, ENBRF has a market cap of 103.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ENBRF trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ENBRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENBRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ENBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, ENNPF has a market cap of 102.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ENNPF trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ENNPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENNPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ENNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, EBRGF has a market cap of 102.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while EBRGF trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas EBRGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBRGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to EBRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, ENBGF has a market cap of 101.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ENBGF trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ENBGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENBGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ENBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 101.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ENB trades at $46.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 73.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while WMB trades at $60.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 64.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while EPD trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 59.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while KMI trades at $26.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 55.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ET trades at $16.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 52.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TRP trades at $50.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TCANF has a market cap of 52.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TCANF trades at $6.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TCANF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TCANF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 52.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while LNG trades at $236.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TNCAF has a market cap of 52.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TNCAF trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TNCAF's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNCAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TNCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 51.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while MPLX trades at $50.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, EBGEF has a market cap of 51.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while EBGEF trades at $23.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas EBGEF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to EBGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, EBBGF has a market cap of 50.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while EBBGF trades at $23.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas EBBGF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBBGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to EBBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 50.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while OKE trades at $80.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ENBA trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 39.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ET-PI trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 34.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TRGP trades at $158.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 34.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 28.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while CQP trades at $59.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CQP's ROE of -18.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, EBRZF has a market cap of 27.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while EBRZF trades at $12.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas EBRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBRZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to EBRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, PMMBF has a market cap of 22.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PMMBF trades at $16.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PMMBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMMBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to PMMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 22.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PBA trades at $39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 20.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while VG trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, PMBPF has a market cap of 20.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PMBPF trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PMBPF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMBPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to PMBPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, SOCGM has a market cap of 15.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SOCGM trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SOCGM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOCGM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to SOCGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while MMP trades at $69.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 13.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while WES trades at $35.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 11.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PAA trades at $16.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 10.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DTM trades at $101.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, PPLAF has a market cap of 10.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PPLAF trades at $17.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PPLAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPLAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to PPLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 9.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while VNOM trades at $41.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, PBNAF has a market cap of 9.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PBNAF trades at $15.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PBNAF's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBNAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to PBNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DCP trades at $41.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while AM trades at $17.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while HESM trades at $36.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, KEYUF has a market cap of 7.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while KEYUF trades at $30.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas KEYUF's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KEYUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to KEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ENLC trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, EQTNP has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while EQTNP trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas EQTNP's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EQTNP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to EQTNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, FRVWY has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while FRVWY trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas FRVWY's P/E ratio is 47.37. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRVWY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to FRVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ETRN trades at $12.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, VOPKF has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while VOPKF trades at $42.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas VOPKF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VOPKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to VOPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, VOPKY has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while VOPKY trades at $41.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas VOPKY's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VOPKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to VOPKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLNG trades at $39.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 82.98. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while FRO trades at $17.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PAGP trades at $17.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while EURN trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while CEQP trades at $28.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NS trades at $21.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while HEP trades at $20.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TPZEF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TPZEF trades at $16.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TPZEF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TPZEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TPZEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GBNXF has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GBNXF trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GBNXF's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GBNXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GBNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while KNTK trades at $40.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, SOCGP has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SOCGP trades at $25.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SOCGP's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOCGP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to SOCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while RTLR trades at $15.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SEAL-PB trades at $24.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DKL trades at $38.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DKL's ROE of -4.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while STNG trades at $40.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NSS trades at $25.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DHT trades at $11.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while INSW trades at $36.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLP trades at $50.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GEL trades at $13.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -11.13. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TRMD trades at $17.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TNK trades at $46.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, SPKOY has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SPKOY trades at $24.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SPKOY's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPKOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to SPKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, FDVWF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while FDVWF trades at $71.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas FDVWF's P/E ratio is 35.02. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FDVWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to FDVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while FLNG trades at $23.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, SNPKF has a market cap of 945.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SNPKF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SNPKF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNPKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to SNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 937.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while LPG trades at $21.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 896.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NVGS trades at $12.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 866.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLP-PB trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 779.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TEN-PE trades at $26.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 655.79M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TK trades at $7.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while OSG trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TNP trades at $18.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 530.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TEN trades at $17.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 441.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PBT trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBT's ROE of +134.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 412.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.14. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 408.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -57.69. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 405.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NGL trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SMLP trades at $38.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMLP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 401.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -56.65. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 389.85M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NGL-PB trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -9.38. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DSSI trades at $9.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 377.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NGL-PC trades at $20.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 339.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SMC trades at $27.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SNMP trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GPP trades at $12.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPP's ROE of -14.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLOP trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 130.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DLNG trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 122.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DLNG-PB trades at $26.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 121.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 267.71. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 116.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while MMLP trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 108.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while BROG trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TWMIF has a market cap of 93.31M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TWMIF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TWMIF's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWMIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, OGSRW has a market cap of 88.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while OGSRW trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas OGSRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OGSRW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to OGSRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, AVACF has a market cap of 33.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while AVACF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas AVACF's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AVACF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to AVACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 26.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while BANL trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 16.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PTLE trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is 59.15. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 7.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while MARPS trades at $3.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 5.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while RBNE trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TTNN has a market cap of 4.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TTNN trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TTNN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TTNN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to TTNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, MRGE has a market cap of 993424.00. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while MRGE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas MRGE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRGE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to MRGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, CWPE has a market cap of 978641.00. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while CWPE trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas CWPE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CWPE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to CWPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, GMLPF has a market cap of 424428.00. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GMLPF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GMLPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GMLPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GMLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61450.00. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while BROGW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, LOGL has a market cap of 9421.00. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while LOGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas LOGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to LOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, FLST has a market cap of 400.00. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while FLST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas FLST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLST's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to FLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TIDE has a market cap of 250.00. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TIDE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TIDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIDE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, SHLX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SHLX trades at $15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SHLX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHLX's ROE of -56.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to SHLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, PBFX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PBFX trades at $19.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, BPMP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while BPMP trades at $17.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, BKEPP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while BKEPP trades at $8.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas BKEPP's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKEPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to BKEPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, OMP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while OMP trades at $23.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas OMP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OMP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to OMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, TGP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TGP trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, BKEP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while BKEP trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, HMLP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while HMLP trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas HMLP's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMLP's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to HMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, HMLP-PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while HMLP-PA trades at $17.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas HMLP-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMLP-PA's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to HMLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, PSXP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PSXP trades at $42.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PSXP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSXP's ROE of -518.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to PSXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.

ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.25B. In comparison, ENBL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ENBL trades at $7.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.