Energy Transfer LP
Energy Transfer LP ET-PE Peers
See (ET-PE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +9.21% |
| EP-PC | $48.89 | +0.34% | 108.6B | N/A | N/A | +6.08% |
| ENB | $44.55 | +0.13% | 97.1B | 22.61 | $1.97 | +5.97% |
| WMB | $58.22 | +0.76% | 71.1B | 31.31 | $1.86 | +3.34% |
| EPD | $31.89 | -0.50% | 69.2B | 11.94 | $2.67 | +6.63% |
| KMI | $27.84 | +0.20% | 61.9B | 24.00 | $1.16 | +4.16% |
| ET | $17.46 | +0.11% | 59.9B | 13.22 | $1.32 | +9.21% |
| LNG | $235.23 | +0.50% | 52.1B | 17.24 | $13.63 | +1.01% |
| MPLX | $50.66 | +0.40% | 51.7B | 11.70 | $4.33 | +7.32% |
| OKE | $81.34 | +0.53% | 50.8B | 15.89 | $5.12 | +4.97% |
Stock Comparison
ET-PE vs EP-PC Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 108.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while EP-PC trades at $48.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs ENB Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ENB trades at $44.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs WMB Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while WMB trades at $58.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs EPD Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while EPD trades at $31.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs KMI Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while KMI trades at $27.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs ET Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ET trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs LNG Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while LNG trades at $235.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs MPLX Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while MPLX trades at $50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs OKE Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while OKE trades at $81.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs ET-PC Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs ET-PD Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs TRP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TRP trades at $47.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs VG Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while VG trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs ENBA Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs ET-PI Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ET-PI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs TRGP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TRGP trades at $171.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 31.72. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs CQP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while CQP trades at $54.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CQP's ROE of -5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs PBA Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PBA trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs WES Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while WES trades at $39.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs MMP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs PAA Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PAA trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs DTM Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DTM trades at $103.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 28.15. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs DCP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs VNOM Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while VNOM trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs AM Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while AM trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs HESM Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while HESM trades at $38.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HESM's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs DCP-PC Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs ENLC Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs ETRN Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs GLNG Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLNG trades at $40.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 1359.33. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs FRO Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while FRO trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs PAGP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PAGP trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs EURN Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs CEQP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs NS Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs NS-PB Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs NS-PA Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs HEP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs KNTK Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while KNTK trades at $41.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 43.60. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs DKL Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DKL trades at $44.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DKL's ROE of +584.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs NS-PC Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs STNG Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while STNG trades at $45.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs RTLR Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs SEAL-PA Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs SEAL-PB Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs GEL Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GEL trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -10.11. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs NSS Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs INSW Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while INSW trades at $40.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs DHT Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DHT trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs TRMD Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TRMD trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs GLP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLP trades at $51.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs TNK Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TNK trades at $44.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs GLOG-PA Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs FLNG Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while FLNG trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs LPG Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while LPG trades at $28.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs NVGS Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NVGS trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs GLP-PA Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs CEQP-P Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs TNP-PE Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs DLNG-PB Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 927.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs GLP-PB Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 883.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLP-PB trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs TEN-PE Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 775.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TEN-PE trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs TK Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 646.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TK trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs TEN Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 624.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TEN trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs OSG Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while OSG trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs PBT Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 603.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PBT trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBT's ROE of +112.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs NGL-PB Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 602.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NGL-PB trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs NGL-PC Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 597.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NGL-PC trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs NGL Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 565M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while NGL trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NGL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs TNP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs GLOP-PA Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 415.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -58.57. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs GLOP-PC Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 414.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -58.52. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs GLOP-PB Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 413.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.34. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs SMLP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMLP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs DSSI Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs SNMP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs TNP-PF Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs TNP-PD Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs SMC Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 298.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SMC trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs GPP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs GLOP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs BROG Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while BROG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs DLNG Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 131.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DLNG trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs DLNG-PA Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 267.24. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs MMLP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 117.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while MMLP trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs BANL Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while BANL trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs MARPS Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while MARPS trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs PTLE Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PTLE trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs RBNE Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while RBNE trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs BROGW Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs PBFX Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs BKEP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, BKEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while BKEP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs HMLP-PA Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, HMLP-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while HMLP-PA trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas HMLP-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMLP-PA's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to HMLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs BPMP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, BPMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while BPMP trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs PSXP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, PSXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while PSXP trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas PSXP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSXP's ROE of -518.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to PSXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs HMLP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, HMLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while HMLP trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas HMLP's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMLP's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to HMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs ENBL Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, ENBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while ENBL trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs OMP Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, OMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while OMP trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas OMP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OMP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is less volatile compared to OMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.
ET-PE vs SHLX Comparison
ET-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET-PE stands at 170.2B. In comparison, SHLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET-PE is priced at $81.43, while SHLX trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 75.82, whereas SHLX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, ET-PE's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHLX's ROE of -56.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ET-PE is more volatile compared to SHLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET-PE.