El Paso Energy Capital Trust I PFD CV TR SECS
El Paso Energy Capital Trust I PFD CV TR SECS EP-PC Peers
See (EP-PC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP-PC | $48.70 | -0.10% | 108.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.88% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +7.34% |
| ENB | $45.84 | +0.59% | 99.9B | 23.27 | $1.97 | +4.21% |
| WMB | $60.29 | -0.54% | 73.6B | 32.41 | $1.86 | +3.20% |
| EPD | $31.25 | -0.57% | 67.8B | 11.70 | $2.67 | +6.80% |
| KMI | $27.93 | -0.09% | 62.1B | 24.07 | $1.16 | +4.14% |
| ET | $17.68 | -0.45% | 60.7B | 13.39 | $1.32 | +7.34% |
| MPLX | $50.93 | +0.14% | 52B | 11.76 | $4.33 | +7.31% |
| TRP | $49.83 | -0.12% | 51.8B | 16.95 | $2.94 | +5.15% |
| LNG | $231.89 | -0.74% | 51.4B | 17.00 | $13.64 | +0.83% |
Stock Comparison
EP-PC vs ET-PE Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs ENB Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 99.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while ENB trades at $45.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs WMB Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while WMB trades at $60.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs EPD Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while EPD trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs KMI Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while KMI trades at $27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs ET Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while ET trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs MPLX Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while MPLX trades at $50.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs TRP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while TRP trades at $49.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs LNG Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while LNG trades at $231.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs OKE Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while OKE trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs ET-PD Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs ET-PC Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs ENBA Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs ET-PI Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while ET-PI trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs TRGP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while TRGP trades at $158.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs VG Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while VG trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs CQP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while CQP trades at $57.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CQP's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs PBA Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while PBA trades at $37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs WES Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while WES trades at $37.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs MMP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs PAA Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while PAA trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs DTM Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while DTM trades at $103.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs AM Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while AM trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs VNOM Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while VNOM trades at $40.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs DCP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs HESM Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while HESM trades at $37.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HESM's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs DCP-PC Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs ENLC Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs ETRN Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs GLNG Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while GLNG trades at $41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 1394.33. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs FRO Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while FRO trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs PAGP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while PAGP trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs EURN Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs CEQP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs NS Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs NS-PB Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs NS-PA Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs KNTK Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while KNTK trades at $45.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 47.60. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs HEP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs NS-PC Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs RTLR Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs SEAL-PA Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs SEAL-PB Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs DKL Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while DKL trades at $41.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DKL's ROE of +584.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs STNG Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while STNG trades at $40.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs NSS Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs GEL Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while GEL trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs DHT Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while DHT trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs INSW Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while INSW trades at $36.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs GLP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while GLP trades at $52.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs TRMD Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while TRMD trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs TNK Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while TNK trades at $43.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs GLOG-PA Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs FLNG Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while FLNG trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs GLP-PA Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs CEQP-P Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs NVGS Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 998.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while NVGS trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs TNP-PE Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs LPG Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 929.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while LPG trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs GLP-PB Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 873.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while GLP-PB trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs TEN-PE Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 768.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while TEN-PE trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs TK Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 689.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while TK trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs OSG Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while OSG trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs TNP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs TEN Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 536.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while TEN trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs PBT Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 527.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while PBT trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBT's ROE of +112.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs NGL-PC Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 460M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while NGL-PC trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs NGL-PB Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 454.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while NGL-PB trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs GLOP-PC Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 415.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -58.59. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs NGL Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 413.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while NGL trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs GLOP-PB Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 412.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.24. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs GLOP-PA Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 405.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -57.23. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs SMLP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMLP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs DSSI Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs SNMP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs TNP-PF Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs SMC Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 323.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while SMC trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs TNP-PD Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs GPP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs GLOP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs BROG Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while BROG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs DLNG-PA Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 139.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 264.48. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs DLNG-PB Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs DLNG Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while DLNG trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs MMLP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 120.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while MMLP trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs BANL Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while BANL trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs PTLE Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while PTLE trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs MARPS Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while MARPS trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs RBNE Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while RBNE trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs BROGW Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs ENBL Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, ENBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while ENBL trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs TGP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, TGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while TGP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TGP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to TGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs HMLP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, HMLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while HMLP trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMLP's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMLP's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to HMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs PSXP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, PSXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while PSXP trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSXP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSXP's ROE of -518.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to PSXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs BKEP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, BKEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while BKEP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs SHLX Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, SHLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while SHLX trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHLX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHLX's ROE of -56.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to SHLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs BPMP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, BPMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while BPMP trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs BKEPP Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, BKEPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while BKEPP trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKEPP's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKEPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is more volatile compared to BKEPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.
EP-PC vs PBFX Comparison
EP-PC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EP-PC stands at 108.2B. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EP-PC is priced at $48.70, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EP-PC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, EP-PC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, EP-PC is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EP-PC.