Enbridge Inc. 6.375 SNT18 B 78
Enbridge Inc. 6.375 SNT18 B 78 ENBA Peers
See (ENBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENBA | $25.40 | N/A | 41.78B | 24.08 | $1.06 | N/A |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.25B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +7.22% |
| EP-PC | $49.00 | +0.31% | 108.88B | N/A | N/A | +4.85% |
| ENB | $44.85 | -0.16% | 97.79B | 23.12 | $1.94 | +4.24% |
| WMB | $58.80 | +0.05% | 71.80B | 31.61 | $1.86 | +3.28% |
| EPD | $32.42 | +0.40% | 70.32B | 12.14 | $2.67 | +6.55% |
| KMI | $28.09 | +0.32% | 62.42B | 24.22 | $1.16 | +4.12% |
| ET | $17.95 | -0.11% | 61.60B | 13.60 | $1.32 | +7.22% |
| OKE | $85.69 | -0.40% | 53.52B | 16.74 | $5.12 | +4.72% |
| MPLX | $52.10 | +0.89% | 53.18B | 12.03 | $4.33 | +7.14% |
Stock Comparison
ENBA vs ET-PE Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs EP-PC Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 108.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while EP-PC trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs ENB Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 97.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while ENB trades at $44.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs WMB Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 71.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while WMB trades at $58.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs EPD Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 70.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while EPD trades at $32.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs KMI Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 62.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while KMI trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs ET Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 61.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while ET trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs OKE Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 53.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while OKE trades at $85.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs MPLX Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 53.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while MPLX trades at $52.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs LNG Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 52.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while LNG trades at $235.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs TRP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 51.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while TRP trades at $49.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs ET-PC Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs ET-PD Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs ET-PI Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 39.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while ET-PI trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs TRGP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 35.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while TRGP trades at $165.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs CQP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 29.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while CQP trades at $61.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CQP's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs VG Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 23.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while VG trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs PBA Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 21.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while PBA trades at $37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs WES Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 15.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while WES trades at $39.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs MMP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs PAA Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 12.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while PAA trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs DTM Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 10.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while DTM trades at $104.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs AM Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 9.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while AM trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs VNOM Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 9.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while VNOM trades at $41.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs DCP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs HESM Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while HESM trades at $38.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HESM's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs DCP-PC Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs ENLC Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs ETRN Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs GLNG Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while GLNG trades at $39.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 82.25. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs FRO Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while FRO trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs PAGP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while PAGP trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs EURN Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs CEQP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs NS Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs NS-PA Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA and NS-PA have similar daily volatility (0.04).
ENBA vs NS-PB Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs KNTK Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while KNTK trades at $45.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 47.80. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs HEP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs NS-PC Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs RTLR Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs SEAL-PA Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs DKL Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while DKL trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DKL's ROE of +584.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs SEAL-PB Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs STNG Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while STNG trades at $42.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs NSS Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs INSW Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while INSW trades at $39.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs DHT Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while DHT trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs GEL Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while GEL trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs TRMD Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while TRMD trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs GLP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while GLP trades at $49.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs TNK Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while TNK trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs GLOG-PA Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs FLNG Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while FLNG trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs GLP-PA Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs CEQP-P Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs LPG Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while LPG trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs TNP-PE Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs NVGS Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 973.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while NVGS trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs GLP-PB Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 870.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while GLP-PB trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs TEN-PE Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 783.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while TEN-PE trades at $26.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs TK Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 698.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while TK trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs OSG Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while OSG trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs TEN Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 555.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while TEN trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs TNP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs PBT Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 512.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while PBT trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBT's ROE of +112.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs NGL-PC Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 459.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while NGL-PC trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -9.22. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs NGL-PB Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 452.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while NGL-PB trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs NGL Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 436.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while NGL trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs GLOP-PC Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 415.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -58.57. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs GLOP-PB Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 414.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.51. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs GLOP-PA Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 405.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -57.24. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs SMLP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMLP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs DSSI Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs SMC Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 359.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while SMC trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs SNMP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs TNP-PF Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs TNP-PD Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs GPP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPP's ROE of -14.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs GLOP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs DLNG-PA Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 139.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 265.26. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs DLNG-PB Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 139.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs DLNG Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 134.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while DLNG trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs BROG Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 132.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while BROG trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs MMLP Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 117.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while MMLP trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -12.54. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs BANL Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 27.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while BANL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs PTLE Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 18.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while PTLE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is 69.00. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs MARPS Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 7.60M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while MARPS trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs RBNE Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 6.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while RBNE trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RBNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.
ENBA vs BROGW Comparison
ENBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENBA stands at 41.78B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61450.00. Regarding current trading prices, ENBA is priced at $25.40, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.08, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENBA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ENBA is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENBA.