Ellington Financial Inc.

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while AGNCO trades at $25.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check AGNCO's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while AGNCP trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.62. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check AGNCP's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while AGNCL trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check AGNCL's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NLY-PI trades at $25.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NLY-PI's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while RITM-PA trades at $25.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check RITM-PA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while RITM-PB trades at $25.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check RITM-PB's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while RITM-PC trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check RITM-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while RITM-PD trades at $24.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check RITM-PD's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NLY trades at $20.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NLY's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NLY-PG trades at $25.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NLY-PG's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NLY-PF trades at $25.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NLY-PF's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while AGNC trades at $9.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check AGNC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while AGNCN trades at $25.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.77. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check AGNCN's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while AGNCM trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check AGNCM's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while STWD trades at $19.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check STWD's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while RITM trades at $12.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check RITM's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NRZ trades at $10.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NRZ's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check EFC-PE's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while ABR-PF trades at $21.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check ABR-PF's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while ABR-PD trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check ABR-PD's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while ABR-PE trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check ABR-PE's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while BXMT trades at $19.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is -42.64. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BXMT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check BXMT's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while RWT-PA trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check RWT-PA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while RWTN trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RWTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check RWTN's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while DX-PC trades at $25.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check DX-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while RC-PE trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check RC-PE's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while RC-PC trades at $15.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check RC-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while MFA-PC trades at $24.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check MFA-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while EFC-PA trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check EFC-PA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while EFC-PC trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check EFC-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while ABR trades at $12.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check ABR's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NYMTM trades at $24.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 523.62. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NYMTM's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while EFC-PB trades at $23.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check EFC-PB's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while EFC-PD trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check EFC-PD's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NYMTL trades at $21.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 466.60. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NYMTL's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while PMT-PC trades at $18.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -25.87. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check PMT-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NYMTZ trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 382.98. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NYMTZ's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while ARR trades at $16.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is -45.51. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check ARR's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while ARR-PC trades at $21.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check ARR-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while LADR trades at $11.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check LADR's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while TRTX-PC trades at $17.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check TRTX-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while ARI trades at $9.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is -197.30. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check ARI's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while DX trades at $12.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check DX's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NYMTO's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while KREF-PA trades at $19.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check KREF-PA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while SCCC trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check SCCC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while CIM-PB trades at $24.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check CIM-PB's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while CIM trades at $14.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check CIM's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while CIM-PA trades at $22.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check CIM-PA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while CIM-PD trades at $24.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 33.08. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check CIM-PD's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while LFT-PA trades at $21.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is 93.19. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check LFT-PA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while CIM-PC trades at $22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check CIM-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while PMT-PA trades at $24.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -33.17. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check PMT-PA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while PMT-PB trades at $23.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -32.72. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check PMT-PB's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while TWO trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -31.70. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check TWO's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while TWO-PA trades at $23.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is 42.09. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check TWO-PA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while TWO-PB trades at $22.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check TWO-PB's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while TWO-PC trades at $23.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check TWO-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while PMT trades at $12.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check PMT's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 975.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while MFA-PB trades at $21.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check MFA-PB's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 975.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while MFA trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check MFA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 973.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while MFAO trades at $25.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check MFAO's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 971.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while MFAN trades at $25.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check MFAN's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 949.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while FBRT-PE trades at $21.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check FBRT-PE's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 946.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while FBRT trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check FBRT's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 943.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while GPMT-PA trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check GPMT-PA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 803.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while RWT trades at $6.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RWT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check RWT's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 791M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while ORC trades at $7.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check ORC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 763.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while RC trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check RC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 761.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while RCB trades at $24.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check RCB's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 747.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while MITT-PC trades at $25.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check MITT-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 746.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while SACH-PA trades at $15.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check SACH-PA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 677.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while TRTX trades at $8.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check TRTX's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while BRMK trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check BRMK's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 633M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NYMT trades at $7.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is -116.83. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NYMT's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while AIC trades at $24.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIC's ROE of +4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check AIC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 630M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NYMTN trades at $21.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 459.57. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NYMTN's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 604.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while KREF trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KREF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check KREF's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 507.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while IVR trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check IVR's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 505M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while IVR-PC trades at $23.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check IVR-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 444.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while CMTG trades at $3.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check CMTG's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 417.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NREF-PA trades at $23.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NREF-PA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, REFI has a market cap of 282.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while REFI trades at $13.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas REFI's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to REFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check REFI's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 257M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while NREF trades at $14.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check NREF's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 256.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while ACRE trades at $4.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -19.42. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check ACRE's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 231.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while MITN trades at $25.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check MITN's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MITT-PB has a market cap of 231.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while MITT-PB trades at $21.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MITT-PB's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITT-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to MITT-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check MITT-PB's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while MITT trades at $7.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check MITT's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MITT-PA has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while MITT-PA trades at $21.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MITT-PA's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITT-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to MITT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check MITT-PA's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AOMR has a market cap of 226.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while AOMR trades at $9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AOMR's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AOMR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to AOMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check AOMR's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EARN has a market cap of 222.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while EARN trades at $5.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas EARN's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EARN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to EARN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check EARN's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ACR-PC has a market cap of 182.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while ACR-PC trades at $24.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ACR-PC's P/E ratio is 48.80. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACR-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to ACR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check ACR-PC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ACR-PD has a market cap of 162.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while ACR-PD trades at $22.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ACR-PD's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACR-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to ACR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check ACR-PD's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SEVN has a market cap of 159.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while SEVN trades at $10.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas SEVN's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to SEVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check SEVN's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ACR has a market cap of 141.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while ACR trades at $19.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ACR's P/E ratio is 68.37. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to ACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check ACR's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AJX has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while AJX trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AJX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AJX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to AJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check AJX's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AAIC has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while AAIC trades at $4.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AAIC's P/E ratio is -60.50. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to AAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check AAIC's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AAIC-PB has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while AAIC-PB trades at $20.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AAIC-PB's P/E ratio is -69.28. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAIC-PB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is less volatile compared to AAIC-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check AAIC-PB's competition here

EFC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EFC stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AAIC-PC has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC is priced at $13.24, while AAIC-PC trades at $24.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EFC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AAIC-PC's P/E ratio is -83.79. In terms of profitability, EFC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAIC-PC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC is more volatile compared to AAIC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC.Check AAIC-PC's competition here