Ellington Financial Inc.
Ellington Financial Inc. EFC-PE Peers
See (EFC-PE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFC-PE | $51.80 | +3.75% | 4.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.77% |
| RITM-PA | $25.28 | +0.08% | 13.4B | 17.32 | $1.46 | +8.85% |
| RITM-PB | $25.27 | -0.04% | 13.4B | N/A | N/A | +8.85% |
| RITM-PC | $24.64 | +0.08% | 13.1B | N/A | N/A | +8.85% |
| RITM-PD | $24.02 | -0.08% | 12.7B | N/A | N/A | +8.85% |
| NLY | $19.06 | +0.95% | 11.5B | 20.72 | $0.92 | +13.94% |
| NLY-PI | $25.15 | +0.20% | 11.5B | 14.23 | $1.77 | +13.94% |
| NLY-PG | $24.44 | +0.12% | 11.5B | 13.82 | $1.77 | +13.94% |
| NLY-PF | $25.20 | +0.04% | 11.5B | 14.25 | $1.77 | +13.94% |
| AGNC | $9.12 | +0.88% | 9.3B | 25.33 | $0.36 | +15.82% |
Stock Comparison
EFC-PE vs RITM-PA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while RITM-PA trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs RITM-PB Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while RITM-PB trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs RITM-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while RITM-PC trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs RITM-PD Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while RITM-PD trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NLY Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NLY trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NLY-PI Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NLY-PI trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NLY-PG Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NLY-PG trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NLY-PF Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NLY-PF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs AGNC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while AGNC trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs AGNCL Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while AGNCL trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs AGNCM Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while AGNCM trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs AGNCO Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while AGNCO trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.66. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs AGNCN Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while AGNCN trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs AGNCP Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while AGNCP trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs STWD Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while STWD trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs RITM Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while RITM trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NRZ Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs ABR-PF Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while ABR-PF trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs RWTN Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while RWTN trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RWTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs ABR-PD Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while ABR-PD trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs RWT-PA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while RWT-PA trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs BXMT Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while BXMT trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is -41.33. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BXMT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs ABR-PE Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while ABR-PE trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs RC-PE Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while RC-PE trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs RC-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while RC-PC trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs MFA-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while MFA-PC trades at $23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs EFC-PA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while EFC-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs EFC-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while EFC-PC trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NYMTM Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NYMTM trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 524.47. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs EFC-PD Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while EFC-PD trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs EFC-PB Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while EFC-PB trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NYMTL Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NYMTL trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 474.04. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs ABR Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while ABR trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs FBRT-PE Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while FBRT-PE trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NYMTZ Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NYMTZ trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 387.45. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs PMT-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while PMT-PC trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -25.79. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs TRTX-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while TRTX-PC trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs ARI Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while ARI trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is -198.90. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs LADR Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while LADR trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs ARR Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while ARR trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is -38.48. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs ARR-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while ARR-PC trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -13.44. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NYMTO Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs KREF-PA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while KREF-PA trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs DX Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while DX trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs DX-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while DX-PC trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs EFC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while EFC trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs SCCC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while SCCC trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs LFT-PA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while LFT-PA trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is 93.49. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs TWO Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while TWO trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -32.29. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs TWO-PA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while TWO-PA trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs CIM Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while CIM trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs TWO-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while TWO-PC trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs CIM-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while CIM-PC trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs TWO-PB Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while TWO-PB trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs CIM-PD Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while CIM-PD trades at $23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs PMT Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while PMT trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs CIM-PB Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while CIM-PB trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs CIM-PA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while CIM-PA trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs PMT-PB Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while PMT-PB trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -32.51. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs PMT-PA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while PMT-PA trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -32.67. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs MFA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 977.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while MFA trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs MFAO Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 973.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while MFAO trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs MFAN Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 971.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while MFAN trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs MFA-PB Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 958M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while MFA-PB trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs FBRT Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 928.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while FBRT trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs GPMT-PA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 887.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while GPMT-PA trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs SACH-PA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 773.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while SACH-PA trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 37.93. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs RWT Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 751.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while RWT trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RWT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs ORC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 740.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while ORC trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs RC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 734M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while RC trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs MITT-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 732.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while MITT-PC trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs RCB Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 713.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while RCB trades at $23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs BRMK Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs AIC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs TRTX Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 628.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while TRTX trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs KREF Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 623.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while KREF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is 54.09. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NYMT Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 611.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NYMT trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is -112.83. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NYMTN Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 592.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NYMTN trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 455.96. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs IVR Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 499.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while IVR trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs IVR-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 496.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while IVR-PC trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs CMTG Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 407.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while CMTG trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NREF-PA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 394.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NREF-PA trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs REFI Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, REFI has a market cap of 301.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while REFI trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REFI's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to REFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs NREF Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while NREF trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs ACRE Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while ACRE trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -19.99. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs MITT-PA Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MITT-PA has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while MITT-PA trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITT-PA's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITT-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to MITT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs MITT-PB Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MITT-PB has a market cap of 222.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while MITT-PB trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITT-PB's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITT-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to MITT-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs MITT Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 219.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while MITT trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs AOMR Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AOMR has a market cap of 215.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while AOMR trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOMR's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AOMR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to AOMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs MITN Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 213.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while MITN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs EARN Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EARN has a market cap of 211.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while EARN trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EARN's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EARN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to EARN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs ACR-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ACR-PC has a market cap of 185.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while ACR-PC trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACR-PC's P/E ratio is 49.51. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACR-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to ACR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs SEVN Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SEVN has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while SEVN trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEVN's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to SEVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs ACR-PD Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ACR-PD has a market cap of 157M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while ACR-PD trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACR-PD's P/E ratio is 41.88. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACR-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to ACR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs AJX Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AJX has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while AJX trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AJX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AJX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to AJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs AAIC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AAIC has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while AAIC trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAIC's P/E ratio is -60.50. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to AAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs AAIC-PB Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AAIC-PB has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while AAIC-PB trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAIC-PB's P/E ratio is -69.28. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAIC-PB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to AAIC-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs AAIC-PC Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AAIC-PC has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while AAIC-PC trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAIC-PC's P/E ratio is -83.79. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAIC-PC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is more volatile compared to AAIC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.
EFC-PE vs LFT Comparison
EFC-PE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LFT has a market cap of 134.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PE is priced at $51.80, while LFT trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFT's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, EFC-PE's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LFT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PE is less volatile compared to LFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PE.