Ellington Financial Inc.
Ellington Financial Inc. EFC-PA Peers
See (EFC-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFC-PA | $25.07 | +0.37% | 2.37B | 16.80 | $1.49 | +11.94% |
| RITM-PA | $25.28 | +0.30% | 13.40B | 17.32 | $1.46 | +8.64% |
| RITM-PB | $25.12 | N/A | 13.32B | N/A | N/A | +8.64% |
| RITM-PC | $24.70 | +0.39% | 13.09B | N/A | N/A | +8.64% |
| RITM-PD | $23.80 | -0.50% | 12.62B | N/A | N/A | +8.64% |
| NLY | $19.53 | -0.15% | 11.82B | 21.23 | $0.92 | +13.53% |
| NLY-PG | $24.57 | -0.12% | 11.78B | 13.90 | $1.77 | +13.53% |
| NLY-PF | $25.68 | -0.19% | 11.77B | 14.52 | $1.77 | +13.53% |
| NLY-PI | $25.62 | -0.31% | 11.76B | 14.49 | $1.77 | +13.53% |
| AGNCL | $25.46 | +0.63% | 9.24B | N/A | N/A | +15.93% |
Stock Comparison
EFC-PA vs RITM-PA Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.40B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while RITM-PA trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs RITM-PB Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.32B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while RITM-PB trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs RITM-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.09B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while RITM-PC trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs RITM-PD Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 12.62B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while RITM-PD trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NLY Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 11.82B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NLY trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NLY-PG Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 11.78B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NLY-PG trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NLY-PF Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 11.77B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NLY-PF trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NLY-PI Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 11.76B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NLY-PI trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs AGNCL Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.24B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while AGNCL trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs AGNCP Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while AGNCP trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.39. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs AGNCO Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while AGNCO trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.66. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs AGNC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 9.14B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while AGNC trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs AGNCN Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 9.14B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while AGNCN trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs AGNCM Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 9.12B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while AGNCM trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs STWD Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 6.80B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while STWD trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs RITM Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while RITM trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NRZ Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs EFC-PE Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs ABR-PF Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while ABR-PF trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs BXMT Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while BXMT trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is -42.35. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BXMT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs ABR-PD Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while ABR-PD trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs RWT-PA Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while RWT-PA trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs ABR-PE Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while ABR-PE trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs RWTN Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while RWTN trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RWTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs RC-PE Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while RC-PE trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs RC-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while RC-PC trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs MFA-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while MFA-PC trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs EFC-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while EFC-PC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NYMTM Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NYMTM trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 521.49. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs EFC-PD Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while EFC-PD trades at $23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs EFC-PB Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while EFC-PB trades at $22.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs ABR Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while ABR trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NYMTL Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NYMTL trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 467.66. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs FBRT-PE Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while FBRT-PE trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs PMT-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while PMT-PC trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -25.94. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NYMTZ Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NYMTZ trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 386.06. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs TRTX-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while TRTX-PC trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs ARR-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while ARR-PC trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -13.41. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs ARR Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while ARR trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs LADR Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while LADR trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs ARI Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while ARI trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is -194.40. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs DX Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while DX trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs DX-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while DX-PC trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs KREF-PA Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while KREF-PA trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NYMTO Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs TWO-PB Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while TWO-PB trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 41.57. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs TWO-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while TWO-PC trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs TWO Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while TWO trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -36.15. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs TWO-PA Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while TWO-PA trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs EFC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while EFC trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs SCCC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while SCCC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs LFT-PA Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while LFT-PA trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is 95.05. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs PMT-PA Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while PMT-PA trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -33.56. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs PMT-PB Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while PMT-PB trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -33.82. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs PMT Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while PMT trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs CIM Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while CIM trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs CIM-PB Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while CIM-PB trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs CIM-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while CIM-PC trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs CIM-PA Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while CIM-PA trades at $22.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs CIM-PD Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while CIM-PD trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs MFA-PB Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while MFA-PB trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs MFAO Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 989.27M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while MFAO trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs MFA Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 982.39M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while MFA trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs MFAN Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 981.21M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while MFAN trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs FBRT Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 952.63M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while FBRT trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs GPMT-PA Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 864.53M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while GPMT-PA trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs RWT Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 782.73M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while RWT trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RWT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs ORC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 765.91M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while ORC trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs MITT-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 743.68M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while MITT-PC trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs RC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 733.08M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while RC trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs SACH-PA Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 727.63M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while SACH-PA trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 35.68. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs RCB Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 723.36M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while RCB trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs KREF Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 639.41M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while KREF trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is 55.47. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs BRMK Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635.03M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs AIC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.38M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NYMT Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 631.18M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NYMT trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is -116.50. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs TRTX Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 623.69M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while TRTX trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NYMTN Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 605.61M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NYMTN trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 471.91. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs IVR Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 499.51M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while IVR trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs IVR-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 498.43M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while IVR-PC trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NREF-PA Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 388.22M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NREF-PA trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs CMTG Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 341.86M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while CMTG trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs REFI Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, REFI has a market cap of 310.11M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while REFI trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas REFI's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to REFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs ACRE Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 263.75M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while ACRE trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -19.98. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs NREF Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 262.08M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while NREF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs AOMR Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, AOMR has a market cap of 238.06M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while AOMR trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AOMR's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AOMR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to AOMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs MITT Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 210.26M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while MITT trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs MITT-PB Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, MITT-PB has a market cap of 209.81M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while MITT-PB trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MITT-PB's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITT-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MITT-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs MITT-PA Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, MITT-PA has a market cap of 209.45M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while MITT-PA trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MITT-PA's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITT-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MITT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs EARN Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, EARN has a market cap of 209.02M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while EARN trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas EARN's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EARN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to EARN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs MITN Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 204.77M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while MITN trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs ACR-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, ACR-PC has a market cap of 184.34M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while ACR-PC trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ACR-PC's P/E ratio is 49.17. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACR-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to ACR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs SEVN Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, SEVN has a market cap of 177.08M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while SEVN trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas SEVN's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to SEVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs ACR-PD Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, ACR-PD has a market cap of 154.69M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while ACR-PD trades at $20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ACR-PD's P/E ratio is 41.26. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACR-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ACR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs ACR Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, ACR has a market cap of 138.12M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while ACR trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ACR's P/E ratio is 66.71. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ACR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs AJX Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, AJX has a market cap of 137.17M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while AJX trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AJX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AJX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to AJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs AAIC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, AAIC has a market cap of 137.08M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while AAIC trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AAIC's P/E ratio is -60.50. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAIC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to AAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs AAIC-PB Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, AAIC-PB has a market cap of 137.08M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while AAIC-PB trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AAIC-PB's P/E ratio is -69.28. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAIC-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to AAIC-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.
EFC-PA vs AAIC-PC Comparison
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 2.37B. In comparison, AAIC-PC has a market cap of 137.08M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $25.07, while AAIC-PC trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AAIC-PC's P/E ratio is -83.79. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAIC-PC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to AAIC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.