Elite Education Group International Limited
Elite Education Group International Limited EEIQ Peers
See (EEIQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEIQ | $0.66 | +4.77% | 8.61M | -1.40 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| TAL | $10.82 | -0.18% | 19.62B | 77.29 | $0.14 | N/A |
| LRN | $154.39 | -0.96% | 6.72B | 24.20 | $6.38 | N/A |
| LOPE | $193.41 | -0.30% | 5.49B | 24.33 | $7.95 | N/A |
| ATGE | $128.41 | -1.75% | 4.61B | 21.73 | $5.91 | N/A |
| GHC | $920.17 | -1.58% | 4.01B | 6.52 | $141.09 | +0.76% |
| LAUR | $21.78 | -0.37% | 3.24B | 11.71 | $1.86 | N/A |
| STRA | $87.57 | -0.91% | 2.12B | 18.71 | $4.68 | +2.72% |
| PRDO | $30.73 | -0.68% | 2.01B | 13.66 | $2.25 | +1.63% |
| UTI | $34.29 | -2.92% | 1.87B | 32.66 | $1.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EEIQ vs TAL Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 19.62B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while TAL trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 77.29. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to TAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs LRN Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, LRN has a market cap of 6.72B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while LRN trades at $154.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas LRN's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LRN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to LRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs LOPE Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while LOPE trades at $193.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs ATGE Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while ATGE trades at $128.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs GHC Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while GHC trades at $920.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs LAUR Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while LAUR trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs STRA Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while STRA trades at $87.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to STRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs PRDO Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while PRDO trades at $30.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs UTI Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while UTI trades at $34.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to UTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs AFYA Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, AFYA has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while AFYA trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AFYA's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to AFYA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to AFYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs KLC Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while KLC trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is -20.08. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs GOTU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while GOTU trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -7.63. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs COUR Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while COUR trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is -20.35. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to COUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs DAO Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while DAO trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 53.24. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to DAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs UDMY Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while UDMY trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs ARCE Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.43M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while ARCE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs EDU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 767.77M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while EDU trades at $46.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to EDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs REDU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.29M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while REDU trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs LINC Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, LINC has a market cap of 676.72M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while LINC trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas LINC's P/E ratio is 54.92. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LINC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to LINC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs APEI Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 525.68M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while APEI trades at $29.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to APEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs RYET Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, RYET has a market cap of 464.74M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while RYET trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas RYET's P/E ratio is -459.00. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to RYET's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to RYET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs QSG Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 338.37M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while QSG trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to QSG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to QSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs VSTA Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 320.81M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while VSTA trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to VSTA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs VTRU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.24M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while VTRU trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to VTRU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs SKIL Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, SKIL has a market cap of 166.33M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while SKIL trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SKIL's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to SKIL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to SKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs LGCY Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 110.81M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while LGCY trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs CHGG Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 106.21M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while CHGG trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to CHGG's ROE of -3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs STG Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 68.95M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while STG trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to STG's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to STG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs KIDZ Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 58.40M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while KIDZ trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is -113.00. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to KIDZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs ONE Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.31M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while ONE trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ONE's ROE of +37.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to ONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs BTCT Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 26.77M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while BTCT trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs GNS Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, GNS has a market cap of 23.91M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while GNS trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GNS's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GNS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to GNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs AIU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 18.78M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while AIU trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to AIU's ROE of +37.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to AIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs GEHI Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.25M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while GEHI trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs EDTK Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 14.97M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while EDTK trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs AACG Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 13.91M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while AACG trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to AACG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs TEDU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.16M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while TEDU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs BEDU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 11.89M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while BEDU trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to BEDU's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs IH Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 10.45M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while IH trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to IH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to IH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs GV Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 9.61M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while GV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to GV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs VEDU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.31M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while VEDU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs VSA Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 7.87M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while VSA trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to VSA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs GSUN Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 6.50M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while GSUN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GSUN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs WAFU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 6.35M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while WAFU trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs TCTM Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.92M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while TCTM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to TCTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs CLEU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while CLEU trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs TWOU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while TWOU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to TWOU's ROE of -6.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs MYND Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, MYND has a market cap of 3.90M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while MYND trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MYND's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to MYND's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to MYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs ASPU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, ASPU has a market cap of 3.69M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while ASPU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ASPU's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ASPU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to ASPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs METX Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.10M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while METX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to METX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to METX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs LXEH Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while LXEH trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LXEH's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs FEDU Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 2.09M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while FEDU trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 98.80. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to FEDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs JZ Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 1.96M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while JZ trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to JZ's ROE of -846.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to JZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs COE Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, COE has a market cap of 1.90M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while COE trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas COE's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to COE's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to COE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs RYB Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while RYB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to RYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs AMBO Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 409888.00. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while AMBO trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to AMBO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is more volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs KIDZW Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 304329.00. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while KIDZW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to KIDZW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs YQ Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 276330.00. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while YQ trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to YQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.
EEIQ vs BTCTW Comparison
EEIQ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEIQ stands at 8.61M. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 13555.00. Regarding current trading prices, EEIQ is priced at $0.66, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EEIQ's ROE is -0.98%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EEIQ is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEIQ.