Corteva, Inc.
Corteva, Inc. CTVA Peers
See (CTVA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTVA | $77.00 | +2.52% | 52.5B | 46.38 | $1.66 | +0.90% |
| CTA-PB | $70.19 | +0.03% | 60.9B | N/A | N/A | +6.36% |
| NTR | $59.99 | +2.51% | 29.2B | 56.59 | $1.06 | +3.70% |
| CF | $93.85 | +1.47% | 15.2B | 12.41 | $7.56 | +2.16% |
| MOS | $37.81 | +2.81% | 12B | 32.59 | $1.16 | +2.33% |
| ICL | $7.21 | +3.00% | 9.3B | 23.23 | $0.31 | +2.64% |
| FMC | $44.45 | +3.52% | 5.6B | 14.48 | $3.07 | +5.37% |
| SMG | $68.97 | +2.79% | 4B | 118.93 | $0.58 | +3.92% |
| UAN | $88.79 | -0.44% | 944.4M | 12.53 | $7.13 | +7.93% |
| IPI | $36.62 | +1.41% | 487M | -2.29 | -$15.94 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CTVA vs CTA-PB Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while CTA-PB trades at $70.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs NTR Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while NTR trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 56.59. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs CF Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while CF trades at $93.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs MOS Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while MOS trades at $37.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs ICL Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while ICL trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs FMC Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while FMC trades at $44.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs SMG Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while SMG trades at $68.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 118.93. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs UAN Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 944.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while UAN trades at $88.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs IPI Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 487M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while IPI trades at $36.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is more volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs BIOX Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 311M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while BIOX trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -35.43. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs LVRO Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while LVRO trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs AVD Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while AVD trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs MULG Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs BHIL-WT Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs CGA Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs ENFY Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while ENFY trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs SEED Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while SEED trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs NITO Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while NITO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs RKDA Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while RKDA trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs SVFD Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs FMTO Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs BHIL Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs YTEN Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs CTA-PA Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 11K. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while CTA-PA trades at $55.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.
CTVA vs MBII Comparison
CTVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTVA stands at 52.5B. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTVA is priced at $77.00, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTVA currently has a P/E ratio of 46.38, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, CTVA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CTVA is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTVA.