E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company CTA-PB Peers
See (CTA-PB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTA-PB | $69.73 | +0.69% | 60.5B | N/A | N/A | +6.36% |
| CTVA | $74.53 | +0.19% | 50.8B | 44.90 | $1.66 | +0.91% |
| NTR | $58.24 | +0.21% | 28.4B | 54.92 | $1.06 | +3.71% |
| CF | $92.00 | +1.11% | 14.9B | 12.17 | $7.56 | +2.17% |
| MOS | $36.48 | +3.28% | 11.6B | 31.44 | $1.16 | +2.36% |
| ICL | $6.88 | +1.93% | 8.9B | 22.21 | $0.31 | +2.67% |
| FMC | $41.75 | -2.70% | 5.2B | 13.60 | $3.07 | +5.57% |
| SMG | $65.96 | +0.33% | 3.8B | 113.76 | $0.58 | +4.02% |
| UAN | $88.84 | +0.67% | 941.8M | 12.50 | $7.13 | +7.96% |
| IPI | $35.73 | +1.36% | 475.7M | -2.24 | -$15.94 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CTA-PB vs CTVA Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while CTVA trades at $74.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 44.90. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs NTR Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while NTR trades at $58.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 54.92. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs CF Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while CF trades at $92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs MOS Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while MOS trades at $36.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs ICL Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while ICL trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs FMC Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while FMC trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs SMG Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while SMG trades at $65.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 113.76. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs UAN Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 941.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while UAN trades at $88.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs IPI Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 475.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while IPI trades at $35.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs BIOX Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 280.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while BIOX trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -31.93. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs LVRO Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 257.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while LVRO trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs AVD Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while AVD trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs MULG Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs BHIL-WT Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs CGA Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs ENFY Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while ENFY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs SEED Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while SEED trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs NITO Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while NITO trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs RKDA Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while RKDA trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs SVFD Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs FMTO Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs BHIL Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs YTEN Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs CTA-PA Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 11K. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while CTA-PA trades at $55.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs MBII Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 60.5B. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $69.73, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.