E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company CTA-PB Peers
See (CTA-PB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTA-PB | $68.15 | -0.62% | 59.1B | N/A | N/A | +6.51% |
| CTVA | $71.64 | +0.62% | 48.9B | 43.16 | $1.66 | +0.95% |
| NTR | $59.77 | -0.86% | 29.1B | 56.39 | $1.06 | +3.62% |
| CF | $92.14 | -0.15% | 14.9B | 12.19 | $7.56 | +2.17% |
| MOS | $34.76 | -4.49% | 11B | 29.97 | $1.16 | +2.46% |
| ICL | $6.66 | -0.97% | 8.6B | 21.47 | $0.31 | +2.78% |
| FMC | $42.75 | +2.03% | 5.3B | 13.93 | $3.07 | +5.44% |
| SMG | $66.50 | +2.29% | 3.8B | 114.66 | $0.58 | +3.95% |
| UAN | $82.10 | -0.11% | 867.8M | 11.51 | $7.13 | +8.62% |
| IPI | $37.23 | -1.79% | 495.8M | -2.34 | -$15.94 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CTA-PB vs CTVA Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while CTVA trades at $71.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 43.16. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs NTR Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while NTR trades at $59.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 56.39. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs CF Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while CF trades at $92.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs MOS Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while MOS trades at $34.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs ICL Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while ICL trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs FMC Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while FMC trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs SMG Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while SMG trades at $66.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 114.66. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs UAN Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 867.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while UAN trades at $82.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs IPI Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 495.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while IPI trades at $37.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs BIOX Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 316.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while BIOX trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is 252.50. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIOX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs LVRO Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while LVRO trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs AVD Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 171.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while AVD trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs MULG Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs BHIL-WT Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs CGA Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs ENFY Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while ENFY trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs SEED Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while SEED trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs NITO Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while NITO trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs RKDA Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while RKDA trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs SVFD Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs FMTO Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while FMTO trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs BHIL Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs YTEN Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs CTA-PA Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while CTA-PA trades at $53.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.
CTA-PB vs MBII Comparison
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $68.15, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.