Critical Metals Corp.
Critical Metals Corp. (CRMLW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRMLW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRMLW | $1.34 | +1.52% | 364.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RIO | $59.49 | -4.46% | 96.9B | 8.43 | $7.07 | +6.76% |
| BHP | $50.65 | -3.91% | 64.3B | 11.31 | $4.48 | +4.89% |
| VALE | $9.63 | -2.63% | 41.2B | 6.99 | $1.38 | +8.64% |
| TECK | $32.13 | -2.70% | 15.8B | 97.39 | $0.33 | +2.28% |
| MP | $60.85 | +0.98% | 10.8B | -96.62 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMC | $6.11 | -7.56% | 2.4B | -26.57 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| MTRN | $101.61 | +10.37% | 2.1B | 211.83 | $0.48 | +0.54% |
| SKE | $13.98 | -6.43% | 1.6B | -12.05 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| STR | $18.15 | -1.09% | 1.4B | 34.92 | $0.52 | +7.38% |
Stock Comparison
CRMLW vs RIO Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 96.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while RIO trades at $59.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check RIO's competition here
CRMLW vs BHP Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while BHP trades at $50.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check BHP's competition here
CRMLW vs VALE Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while VALE trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check VALE's competition here
CRMLW vs TECK Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while TECK trades at $32.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 97.39. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check TECK's competition here
CRMLW vs MP Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while MP trades at $60.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -96.62. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check MP's competition here
CRMLW vs TMC Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while TMC trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -26.57. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check TMC's competition here
CRMLW vs MTRN Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while MTRN trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 211.83. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check MTRN's competition here
CRMLW vs SKE Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while SKE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check SKE's competition here
CRMLW vs STR Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while STR trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check STR's competition here
CRMLW vs IPX Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while IPX trades at $38.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -14.96. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check IPX's competition here
CRMLW vs USAR Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while USAR trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USAR's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check USAR's competition here
CRMLW vs VZLA Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while VZLA trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -148.98. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check VZLA's competition here
CRMLW vs CMP Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 822.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while CMP trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check CMP's competition here
CRMLW vs GSM Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 806.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while GSM trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -18.78. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check GSM's competition here
CRMLW vs NEXA Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 633.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while NEXA trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check NEXA's competition here
CRMLW vs SGML Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 613.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while SGML trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -16.70. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check SGML's competition here
CRMLW vs USAS Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 574.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while USAS trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check USAS's competition here
CRMLW vs LAC Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 558.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while LAC trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check LAC's competition here
CRMLW vs TMCWW Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while TMCWW trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check TMCWW's competition here
CRMLW vs SLI Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 486.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while SLI trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check SLI's competition here
CRMLW vs LAAC Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check LAAC's competition here
CRMLW vs NAK Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 439.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while NAK trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check NAK's competition here
CRMLW vs LAR Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 437.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while LAR trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -38.57. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check LAR's competition here
CRMLW vs PLM Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check PLM's competition here
CRMLW vs GRFX Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check GRFX's competition here
CRMLW vs LZM Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 347.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while LZM trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check LZM's competition here
CRMLW vs UAMY Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 344.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while UAMY trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -289.00. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check UAMY's competition here
CRMLW vs CRML Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 333.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while CRML trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check CRML's competition here
CRMLW vs EMX Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 315.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while EMX trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -97.51. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check EMX's competition here
CRMLW vs USARW Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 304.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while USARW trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USARW's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check USARW's competition here
CRMLW vs TMQ Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 272.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while TMQ trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -27.67. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check TMQ's competition here
CRMLW vs NMG Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 268M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while NMG trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check NMG's competition here
CRMLW vs WRN Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 246.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while WRN trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -61.66. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check WRN's competition here
CRMLW vs ABAT Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 207.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while ABAT trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check ABAT's competition here
CRMLW vs NB Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 196.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while NB trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check NB's competition here
CRMLW vs IONR Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 171.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while IONR trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -13.86. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check IONR's competition here
CRMLW vs PLL Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while PLL trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check PLL's competition here
CRMLW vs USGO Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while USGO trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -11.26. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check USGO's competition here
CRMLW vs LGO Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while LGO trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check LGO's competition here
CRMLW vs FURY Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while FURY trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check FURY's competition here
CRMLW vs GRO Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while GRO trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check GRO's competition here
CRMLW vs AMLI Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while AMLI trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check AMLI's competition here
CRMLW vs WWR Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while WWR trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check WWR's competition here
CRMLW vs XPL Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while XPL trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check XPL's competition here
CRMLW vs LITM Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while LITM trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check LITM's competition here
CRMLW vs ELBM Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while ELBM trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check ELBM's competition here
CRMLW vs GTI Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while GTI trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check GTI's competition here
CRMLW vs BYU Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check BYU's competition here
CRMLW vs STR-WT Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check STR-WT's competition here
CRMLW vs GLG Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check GLG's competition here
CRMLW vs KMCM Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRMLW has daily volatility of 30.51 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
CRMLW vs IFFT Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check IFFT's competition here
CRMLW vs BBL Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check BBL's competition here
CRMLW vs VEDL Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check VEDL's competition here
CRMLW vs SMTS Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check SMTS's competition here
CRMLW vs EXN Comparison July 2025
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 364.9M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $1.34, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.Check EXN's competition here