Critical Metals Corp.
Critical Metals Corp. CRMLW Peers
See (CRMLW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRMLW | $0.37 | -2.76% | 247.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RIO | $57.03 | -2.20% | 92.7B | 8.07 | $7.07 | +7.03% |
| BHP | $47.77 | -2.32% | 60.6B | 10.66 | $4.48 | +5.16% |
| VALE | $9.36 | -4.74% | 39.9B | 6.73 | $1.39 | +8.91% |
| TECK | $38.50 | -1.60% | 18.9B | 769.90 | $0.05 | +1.88% |
| MP | $35.49 | +2.42% | 5.8B | -56.33 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMCWW | $1.19 | -2.46% | 2B | -1.89 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMC | $5.43 | -2.84% | 2B | -23.61 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| SKE | $14.65 | -0.71% | 1.7B | -12.62 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| MTRN | $77.73 | -2.40% | 1.6B | 161.93 | $0.48 | +0.70% |
Stock Comparison
CRMLW vs RIO Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while RIO trades at $57.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs BHP Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while BHP trades at $47.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs VALE Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while VALE trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs TECK Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while TECK trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 769.90. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs MP Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while MP trades at $35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -56.33. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs TMCWW Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while TMCWW trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs TMC Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while TMC trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -23.61. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs SKE Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while SKE trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs MTRN Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while MTRN trades at $77.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 161.93. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs STR Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while STR trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 38.79. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs USAR Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while USAR trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USAR's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs VZLA Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while VZLA trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -177.25. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs IPX Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 897.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while IPX trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs CMP Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 823.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while CMP trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs GSM Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 727.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while GSM trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -16.96. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs NAK Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 703M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while NAK trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -13.05. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs NEXA Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 649M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while NEXA trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs LAC Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while LAC trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -11.91. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs SGML Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 563.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while SGML trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -15.33. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs USAS Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 548M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while USAS trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs LAAC Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs PLM Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs GRFX Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs SLI Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 378.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while SLI trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs LAR Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 336.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while LAR trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -29.71. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs UAMY Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 329.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while UAMY trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -277.00. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs LZM Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while LZM trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs CRML Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 267.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while CRML trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs WRN Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while WRN trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -44.17. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs NMG Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 264.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while NMG trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs EMX Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 264.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while EMX trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -81.67. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs USARW Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 239.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while USARW trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USARW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs TMQ Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 220.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while TMQ trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -26.90. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs IONR Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while IONR trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -16.82. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs NB Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while NB trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -14.58. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs PLL Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 132.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while PLL trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs USGO Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while USGO trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs ABAT Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 120.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while ABAT trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs AMLI Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while AMLI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs LGO Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while LGO trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs FURY Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while FURY trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs GRO Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while GRO trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs XPL Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while XPL trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs WWR Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while WWR trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs LITM Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while LITM trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs ELBM Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while ELBM trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs GTI Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while GTI trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs BYU Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs STR-WT Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs GLG Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs KMCM Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRMLW has daily volatility of 20.86 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.
CRMLW vs IFFT Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs VEDL Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs EXN Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs SMTS Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.
CRMLW vs BBL Comparison
CRMLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRMLW stands at 247.7M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRMLW is priced at $0.37, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRMLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, CRMLW's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRMLW is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRMLW.