Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check ET-PE's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while EP-PC trades at $49.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check EP-PC's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while ENB trades at $48.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check ENB's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while WMB trades at $57.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check WMB's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while EPD trades at $31.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check EPD's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while KMI trades at $26.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check KMI's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while ET trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check ET's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while TRP trades at $51.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check TRP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while MPLX trades at $50.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check MPLX's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while LNG trades at $232.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check LNG's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check ET-PD's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check ET-PC's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while OKE trades at $74.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check OKE's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while ENBA trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check ENBA's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while ET-PI trades at $11.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check ET-PI's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while TRGP trades at $165.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check TRGP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while VG trades at $13.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check VG's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while PBA trades at $36.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check PBA's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while WES trades at $38.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check WES's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while MMP trades at $69.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check MMP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while PAA trades at $17.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check PAA's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while VNOM trades at $38.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check VNOM's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while DTM trades at $103.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check DTM's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while DCP trades at $41.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check DCP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while HESM trades at $41.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check HESM's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while AM trades at $18.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check AM's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check DCP-PC's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while ENLC trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check ENLC's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while ETRN trades at $12.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check ETRN's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while GLNG trades at $40.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is -577.29. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check GLNG's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while FRO trades at $18.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check FRO's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while PAGP trades at $19.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is -134.50. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check PAGP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while EURN trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check EURN's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while CEQP trades at $28.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check CEQP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while NS trades at $21.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check NS's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check NS-PB's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check NS-PA's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while HEP trades at $20.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check HEP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while KNTK trades at $40.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 55.89. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check KNTK's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check NS-PC's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while DKL trades at $43.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to DKL's ROE of +7.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check DKL's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while STNG trades at $44.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check STNG's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check SEAL-PB's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while RTLR trades at $15.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check RTLR's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check SEAL-PA's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while GEL trades at $16.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check GEL's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while INSW trades at $41.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check INSW's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while NSS trades at $25.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check NSS's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while TRMD trades at $20.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check TRMD's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while DHT trades at $11.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check DHT's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while GLP trades at $51.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check GLP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while TNK trades at $44.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check TNK's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check GLOG-PA's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while FLNG trades at $25.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check FLNG's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while LPG trades at $30.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check LPG's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while NVGS trades at $15.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check NVGS's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check GLP-PA's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check CEQP-P's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check TNP-PE's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 877.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while GLP-PB trades at $25.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check GLP-PB's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 783.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while TEN-PE trades at $26.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check TEN-PE's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 737.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while PBT trades at $15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 43.97. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to PBT's ROE of +126.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check PBT's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 632.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while NGL trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to NGL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check NGL's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while NGL-PB trades at $22.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -10.02. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check NGL-PB's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 620.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while TK trades at $7.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check TK's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 620.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while NGL-PC trades at $22.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check NGL-PC's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 615.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while TEN trades at $19.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check TEN's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while OSG trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check OSG's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while TNP trades at $18.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check TNP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 423.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while GLOP-PC trades at $26.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -59.73. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check GLOP-PC's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 422.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while GLOP-PB trades at $26.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -59.57. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check GLOP-PB's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 414.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -58.48. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check GLOP-PA's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while SMLP trades at $38.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to SMLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check SMLP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while DSSI trades at $9.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check DSSI's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while SNMP trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check SNMP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check TNP-PF's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check TNP-PD's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while GPP trades at $12.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check GPP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while GLOP trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check GLOP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 255.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while SMC trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check SMC's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while BROG trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check BROG's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while MMLP trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check MMLP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 128.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while DLNG trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check DLNG's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 127.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while DLNG-PA trades at $26.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 272.40. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check DLNG-PA's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while DLNG-PB trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check DLNG-PB's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while BANL trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check BANL's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while RBNE trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to RBNE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check RBNE's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while MARPS trades at $4.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check MARPS's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while PTLE trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check PTLE's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while BROGW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check BROGW's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, BKEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while BKEP trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check BKEP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, BKEPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while BKEPP trades at $8.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BKEPP's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to BKEPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to BKEPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check BKEPP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, BPMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while BPMP trades at $17.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check BPMP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, PSXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while PSXP trades at $42.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PSXP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to PSXP's ROE of -518.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to PSXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check PSXP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, TGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while TGP trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to TGP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to TGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check TGP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, HMLP-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while HMLP-PA trades at $17.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HMLP-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to HMLP-PA's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to HMLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check HMLP-PA's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, HMLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while HMLP trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HMLP's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to HMLP's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is more volatile compared to HMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check HMLP's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, ENBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while ENBL trades at $7.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check ENBL's competition here

CQP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQP stands at 26.2B. In comparison, OMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CQP is priced at $54.71, while OMP trades at $23.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQP currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas OMP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, CQP's ROE is -6.65%, compared to OMP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CQP is less volatile compared to OMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQP.Check OMP's competition here