Clearwater Paper Corporation
Clearwater Paper Corporation CLW Peers
See (CLW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLW | $29.63 | +2.21% | 481.7M | -6.37 | -$4.65 | N/A |
| SUZ | $8.81 | -1.34% | 10.9B | -9.08 | -$0.97 | +0.54% |
| LPX | $92.24 | +1.18% | 6.4B | 16.15 | $5.71 | +1.17% |
| UFPI | $97.06 | -0.60% | 5.9B | 15.89 | $6.11 | +1.40% |
| WFG | $74.64 | +1.56% | 5.7B | -2488.00 | -$0.03 | +1.72% |
| SLVM | $53.15 | -0.15% | 2.2B | 7.80 | $6.81 | +3.37% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | N/A |
| MATV | $6.49 | -0.61% | 354.6M | -0.79 | -$8.20 | +6.16% |
| MERC | $3.65 | -0.27% | 244.1M | -2.70 | -$1.35 | +8.22% |
Stock Comparison
CLW vs SUZ Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while SUZ trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUZ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs LPX Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while LPX trades at $92.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs UFPI Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while UFPI trades at $97.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs WFG Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while WFG trades at $74.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -2488.00. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs SLVM Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while SLVM trades at $53.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs RFP Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs SWM Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs MATV Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 354.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while MATV trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs MERC Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while MERC trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MERC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs GLT Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs EVA Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs NWGL Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while NWGL trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs JCTCF Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs JCTC Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while JCTC trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -10.47. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs ITP Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while ITP trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs VRS Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs UFS Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs NP Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 481.7M. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $29.63, while NP trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.37, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.