Clearwater Paper Corporation
Clearwater Paper Corporation CLW Peers
See (CLW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLW | $28.54 | +0.21% | 463.93M | -6.14 | -$4.65 | N/A |
| SUZ | $9.49 | -0.16% | 11.75B | -9.21 | -$1.03 | +2.85% |
| LPX | $92.71 | -1.31% | 6.45B | 16.24 | $5.71 | +1.13% |
| UFPI | $100.59 | -2.90% | 6.08B | 16.46 | $6.11 | +1.32% |
| WFG | $73.90 | -3.42% | 5.69B | -2463.33 | -$0.03 | +1.73% |
| SLVM | $59.52 | -0.55% | 2.42B | 8.29 | $7.18 | +3.21% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.68B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.29B | 10.79 | $2.17 | N/A |
| MATV | $6.11 | -4.23% | 333.81M | -0.75 | -$8.20 | +6.55% |
| MERC | $4.01 | -1.47% | 268.15M | -2.97 | -$1.35 | +7.42% |
Stock Comparison
CLW vs SUZ Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 11.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while SUZ trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is -9.21. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs LPX Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while LPX trades at $92.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs UFPI Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while UFPI trades at $100.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs WFG Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while WFG trades at $73.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -2463.33. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs SLVM Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while SLVM trades at $59.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs RFP Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs SWM Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs MATV Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 333.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while MATV trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs MERC Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 268.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while MERC trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MERC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs GLT Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs EVA Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs NWGL Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 21.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while NWGL trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs JCTCF Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs JCTC Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 13.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while JCTC trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.
CLW vs ITP Comparison
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 463.93M. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 1.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $28.54, while ITP trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -6.14, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.