China Green Agriculture, Inc.
China Green Agriculture, Inc. CGA Peers
See (CGA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGA | $1.98 | N/A | 29.29M | -0.98 | -$2.03 | N/A |
| CTA-PB | $69.00 | -1.33% | 59.88B | N/A | N/A | +6.48% |
| CTVA | $67.95 | +0.24% | 46.35B | 55.70 | $1.22 | +0.99% |
| NTR | $56.21 | +1.04% | 27.46B | 41.33 | $1.36 | +3.87% |
| CF | $84.38 | +2.38% | 13.67B | 12.52 | $6.74 | +2.39% |
| MOS | $32.94 | +0.83% | 10.45B | 28.40 | $1.16 | +2.60% |
| ICL | $6.85 | -0.87% | 8.84B | 21.41 | $0.32 | +2.73% |
| FMC | $38.22 | +3.89% | 4.77B | 12.45 | $3.07 | +6.06% |
| SMG | $57.02 | +5.61% | 3.29B | 98.31 | $0.58 | +4.63% |
| UAN | $81.84 | -1.33% | 865.02M | 11.48 | $7.13 | +8.61% |
Stock Comparison
CGA vs CTA-PB Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while CTA-PB trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs CTVA Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 46.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while CTVA trades at $67.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 55.70. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs NTR Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 27.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while NTR trades at $56.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 41.33. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs CF Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 13.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while CF trades at $84.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs MOS Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 10.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while MOS trades at $32.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs ICL Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while ICL trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs FMC Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while FMC trades at $38.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs SMG Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while SMG trades at $57.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 98.31. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs UAN Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 865.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while UAN trades at $81.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs IPI Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 474.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while IPI trades at $35.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs BIOX Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 291.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while BIOX trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is 232.50. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BIOX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs LVRO Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 283.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while LVRO trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs AVD Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 128.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while AVD trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs MULG Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA and MULG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGA vs BHIL-WT Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs ENFY Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 16.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while ENFY trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs SEED Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 8.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while SEED trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs NITO Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 7.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while NITO trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs RKDA Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 5.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while RKDA trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs SVFD Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs FMTO Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while FMTO trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs BHIL Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs YTEN Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345460.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.
CGA vs CTA-PA Comparison
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.29M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 10850.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while CTA-PA trades at $54.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.