China Green Agriculture, Inc.
China Green Agriculture, Inc. (CGA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CGA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGA | $1.98 | N/A | 29.3M | -0.98 | -$2.03 | N/A |
| CTA-PB | $71.63 | +1.47% | 62.2B | N/A | N/A | +6.28% |
| CTVA | $73.15 | +0.23% | 49.8B | 33.81 | $2.17 | +0.93% |
| NTR | $57.58 | -0.06% | 28.2B | 20.82 | $2.78 | +3.75% |
| CF | $86.09 | -0.32% | 14B | 11.33 | $7.63 | +2.31% |
| MOS | $32.43 | -0.55% | 10.3B | 11.03 | $2.95 | +2.64% |
| ICL | $6.40 | +2.40% | 8.2B | 21.78 | $0.29 | +2.91% |
| FMC | $40.20 | +2.19% | 5.1B | 39.12 | $1.04 | +5.70% |
| SMG | $62.31 | +2.85% | 3.7B | 77.35 | $0.82 | +4.18% |
| UAN | $90.70 | +0.50% | 952.8M | 10.84 | $8.32 | +10.09% |
Stock Comparison
CGA vs CTA-PB Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while CTA-PB trades at $71.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check CTA-PB's competition here
CGA vs CTVA Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while CTVA trades at $73.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check CTVA's competition here
CGA vs NTR Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while NTR trades at $57.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check NTR's competition here
CGA vs CF Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while CF trades at $86.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check CF's competition here
CGA vs MOS Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while MOS trades at $32.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check MOS's competition here
CGA vs ICL Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while ICL trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check ICL's competition here
CGA vs FMC Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while FMC trades at $40.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 39.12. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check FMC's competition here
CGA vs SMG Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while SMG trades at $62.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 77.35. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check SMG's competition here
CGA vs UAN Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 952.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while UAN trades at $90.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check UAN's competition here
CGA vs IPI Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 374.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while IPI trades at $28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check IPI's competition here
CGA vs LVRO Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while LVRO trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check LVRO's competition here
CGA vs BIOX Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while BIOX trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -20.93. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check BIOX's competition here
CGA vs AVD Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 154.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while AVD trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check AVD's competition here
CGA vs MULG Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA and MULG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MULG's competition here
CGA vs BHIL-WT Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check BHIL-WT's competition here
CGA vs ENFY Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while ENFY trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA and ENFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENFY's competition here
CGA vs SEED Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while SEED trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check SEED's competition here
CGA vs NITO Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while NITO trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check NITO's competition here
CGA vs RKDA Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while RKDA trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA and RKDA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKDA's competition here
CGA vs SVFD Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check SVFD's competition here
CGA vs FMTO Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -10.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check FMTO's competition here
CGA vs BHIL Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check BHIL's competition here
CGA vs YTEN Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check YTEN's competition here
CGA vs CTA-PA Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while CTA-PA trades at $56.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA and CTA-PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTA-PA's competition here
CGA vs MBII Comparison August 2025
CGA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGA stands at 29.3M. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CGA is priced at $1.98, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.98, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, CGA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CGA is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGA.Check MBII's competition here