CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. CF Peers
See (CF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF | $87.72 | +3.95% | 14.21B | 13.01 | $6.74 | +2.27% |
| CTA-PB | $69.08 | -0.19% | 59.95B | N/A | N/A | +6.45% |
| CTVA | $67.90 | -0.10% | 46.32B | 55.65 | $1.22 | +0.98% |
| NTR | $58.06 | +3.31% | 28.37B | 42.69 | $1.36 | +3.73% |
| MOS | $34.23 | +3.88% | 10.86B | 29.51 | $1.16 | +2.48% |
| ICL | $6.84 | -0.07% | 8.82B | 21.36 | $0.32 | +2.76% |
| FMC | $38.13 | -0.24% | 4.76B | 12.42 | $3.07 | +6.07% |
| SMG | $59.02 | +3.54% | 3.41B | 101.76 | $0.58 | +4.47% |
| UAN | $82.15 | +0.37% | 868.29M | 11.52 | $7.13 | +8.54% |
| IPI | $36.32 | +1.79% | 483.67M | -2.28 | -$15.94 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CF vs CTA-PB Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while CTA-PB trades at $69.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs CTVA Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 46.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while CTVA trades at $67.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 55.65. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs NTR Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 28.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while NTR trades at $58.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 42.69. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs MOS Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 10.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while MOS trades at $34.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs ICL Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while ICL trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs FMC Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while FMC trades at $38.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs SMG Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while SMG trades at $59.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 101.76. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs UAN Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 868.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while UAN trades at $82.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs IPI Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 483.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while IPI trades at $36.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs BIOX Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 293.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while BIOX trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is 234.00. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BIOX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs LVRO Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 285.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while LVRO trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs AVD Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 127.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while AVD trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs MULG Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs BHIL-WT Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs CGA Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs ENFY Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 17.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while ENFY trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs SEED Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 9.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while SEED trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs NITO Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 6.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while NITO trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs RKDA Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 5.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while RKDA trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs SVFD Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs FMTO Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while FMTO trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs BHIL Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs YTEN Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345460.00. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.
CF vs CTA-PA Comparison
CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 14.21B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 10900.00. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $87.72, while CTA-PA trades at $54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.01, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.