BAIYU Holdings, Inc.
BAIYU Holdings, Inc. BYU Peers
See (BYU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYU | $0.18 | -1.65% | 8.94M | 0.17 | $1.08 | N/A |
| RIO | $62.28 | +1.42% | 101.18B | 8.81 | $7.07 | +6.43% |
| BHP | $50.80 | +1.80% | 64.45B | 11.34 | $4.48 | +4.84% |
| VALE | $9.89 | +2.97% | 42.20B | 7.16 | $1.38 | +8.38% |
| TECK | $37.98 | +0.82% | 18.80B | 759.60 | $0.05 | +1.89% |
| MP | $20.76 | -1.80% | 3.39B | -36.42 | -$0.57 | N/A |
| MTRN | $78.54 | +0.91% | 1.63B | 163.63 | $0.48 | +0.69% |
| STR | $18.82 | +1.73% | 1.46B | 38.41 | $0.49 | +7.38% |
| SKE | $12.49 | +2.59% | 1.43B | -11.35 | -$1.10 | N/A |
| TMC | $2.97 | -5.41% | 1.07B | -11.88 | -$0.25 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BYU vs RIO Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 101.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while RIO trades at $62.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs BHP Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 64.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while BHP trades at $50.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs VALE Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 42.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while VALE trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs TECK Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 18.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while TECK trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 759.60. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs MP Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while MP trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -36.42. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs MTRN Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while MTRN trades at $78.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 163.63. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs STR Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while STR trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 38.41. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs SKE Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while SKE trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs TMC Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while TMC trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMC's ROE of +7.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs SGML Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 921.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while SGML trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -17.91. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs CMP Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 820.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while CMP trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs USAR Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 801.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while USAR trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 98.33. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USAR's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs GSM Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 746.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while GSM trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs NEXA Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 704.58M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while NEXA trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs VZLA Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 691.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while VZLA trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -119.25. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs LAC Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 667.57M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while LAC trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -14.52. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs NAK Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 554.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while NAK trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -20.60. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs LAAC Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs PLM Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs USARW Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 360.11M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while USARW trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USARW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs USAS Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 357.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while USAS trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USAS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs LAR Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 338.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while LAR trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -23.22. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs NMG Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 306.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while NMG trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs UAMY Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 304.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while UAMY trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -129.25. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs LZM Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 288.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while LZM trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs SLI Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 257.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while SLI trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs WRN Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 227.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while WRN trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -37.83. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs TMQ Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 224.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while TMQ trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -27.30. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs EMX Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 223.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while EMX trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -68.33. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EMX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs TMCWW Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 211.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while TMCWW trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +7.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs PLL Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 154.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while PLL trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs CRML Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 150.86M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while CRML trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs NB Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 132.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while NB trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs USGO Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 127.49M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while USGO trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs ABAT Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 118.52M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while ABAT trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs LGO Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 99.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while LGO trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs AMLI Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 86.14M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while AMLI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs GRO Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 82.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while GRO trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs IPX Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 65.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while IPX trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -14.69. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs FURY Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 58.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while FURY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs XPL Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 49.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while XPL trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs GRFX Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 44.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs WWR Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 34.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while WWR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs LITM Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 30.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while LITM trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs CRMLW Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 18.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while CRMLW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs ELBM Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 18.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while ELBM trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs GTI Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 14.85M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while GTI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs IONR Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 5.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while IONR trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -21.54. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs STR-WT Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239189.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs GLG Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221055.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYU is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYU.
BYU vs KMCM Comparison
BYU plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYU stands at 8.94M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238.00. Regarding current trading prices, BYU is priced at $0.18, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.17, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYU's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BYU has daily volatility of 10.53 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.