BHP Group Limited
BHP Group Limited BHP Peers
See (BHP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP | $48.62 | +0.58% | 61.7B | 10.85 | $4.48 | +5.09% |
| RIO | $58.74 | +0.27% | 95.4B | 8.31 | $7.07 | +6.86% |
| VALE | $9.74 | +2.85% | 41.6B | 7.05 | $1.38 | +8.59% |
| TECK | $40.53 | -2.29% | 19.9B | 810.60 | $0.05 | +1.79% |
| MP | $32.90 | -8.59% | 5.4B | -52.16 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMCWW | $1.55 | -9.41% | 2.6B | -2.46 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMC | $6.81 | -5.15% | 2.5B | -29.61 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| SKE | $15.18 | -3.00% | 1.7B | -13.08 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| MTRN | $80.76 | +0.09% | 1.7B | 168.43 | $0.48 | +0.68% |
| STR | $18.44 | -0.97% | 1.4B | 35.52 | $0.52 | +7.27% |
Stock Comparison
BHP vs RIO Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while RIO trades at $58.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs VALE Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while VALE trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs TECK Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while TECK trades at $40.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 810.60. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs MP Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while MP trades at $32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -52.16. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs TMCWW Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while TMCWW trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs TMC Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while TMC trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -29.61. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs SKE Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while SKE trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs MTRN Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while MTRN trades at $80.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 168.43. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs STR Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while STR trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 35.52. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs USAR Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while USAR trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to USAR's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs IPX Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 969M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while IPX trades at $30.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs CMP Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 833.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while CMP trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs NAK Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 829.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while NAK trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs VZLA Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 823.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while VZLA trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -142.00. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs GSM Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 683.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while GSM trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs NEXA Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 651.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while NEXA trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs LAC Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 610.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while LAC trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs SGML Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 514.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while SGML trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs USAS Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 511.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while USAS trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs LAAC Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs PLM Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs GRFX Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs SLI Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 379.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while SLI trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs LAR Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while LAR trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -30.43. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs LZM Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 337M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while LZM trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs CRML Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 305.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while CRML trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs UAMY Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 276.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while UAMY trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -232.50. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs EMX Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while EMX trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -82.83. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs NMG Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 249.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while NMG trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs WRN Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while WRN trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -40.83. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs TMQ Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 234.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while TMQ trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -28.60. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs CRMLW Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 226.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while CRMLW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs USARW Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 204.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while USARW trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to USARW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs IONR Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while IONR trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs NB Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 138.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while NB trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -13.05. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs ABAT Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while ABAT trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs PLL Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while PLL trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs USGO Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 107.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while USGO trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -12.31. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs AMLI Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while AMLI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs FURY Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while FURY trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs LGO Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 78.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while LGO trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs XPL Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while XPL trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs GRO Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while GRO trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs WWR Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while WWR trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs LITM Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while LITM trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs ELBM Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while ELBM trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs GTI Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while GTI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs BYU Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs STR-WT Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs GLG Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs KMCM Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BHP has daily volatility of 1.07 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.
BHP vs IFFT Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs VEDL Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs SMTS Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs EXN Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.
BHP vs BBL Comparison
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 61.7B. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $48.62, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 10.85, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.