Saul Centers, Inc.
Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFS | $33.11 | +0.36% | 801.8M | 22.52 | $1.47 | +7.13% |
| SPG | $167.11 | +1.30% | 54.5B | 26.61 | $6.28 | +5.00% |
| SPG-PJ | $54.85 | -2.05% | 53B | 8.09 | $6.78 | +5.00% |
| O | $57.90 | -0.21% | 52.3B | 52.64 | $1.10 | +5.51% |
| KIM-PN | $60.00 | +1.08% | 40B | N/A | N/A | +6.11% |
| KIM-PM | $20.44 | +0.34% | 14.9B | 12.42 | $1.65 | +4.54% |
| KIM-PL | $20.12 | -0.05% | 14.9B | 12.22 | $1.65 | +4.54% |
| KIM | $21.78 | -0.91% | 14.7B | 28.67 | $0.76 | +4.54% |
| REG | $71.18 | -0.49% | 12.9B | 33.73 | $2.11 | +3.92% |
| FRT-PC | $20.33 | +0.20% | 8.3B | 6.19 | $3.29 | +4.67% |
Stock Comparison
BFS vs SPG Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while SPG trades at $167.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPG's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SPG's competition here
BFS vs SPG-PJ Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while SPG-PJ trades at $54.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
BFS vs O Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, O has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while O trades at $57.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas O's P/E ratio is 52.64. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check O's competition here
BFS vs KIM-PN Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while KIM-PN trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check KIM-PN's competition here
BFS vs KIM-PM Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while KIM-PM trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check KIM-PM's competition here
BFS vs KIM-PL Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while KIM-PL trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check KIM-PL's competition here
BFS vs KIM Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while KIM trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check KIM's competition here
BFS vs REG Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while REG trades at $71.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check REG's competition here
BFS vs FRT-PC Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while FRT-PC trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check FRT-PC's competition here
BFS vs FRT Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while FRT trades at $94.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check FRT's competition here
BFS vs ADC Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while ADC trades at $73.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 41.54. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check ADC's competition here
BFS vs NNN Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while NNN trades at $42.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check NNN's competition here
BFS vs BRX Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while BRX trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check BRX's competition here
BFS vs KRG Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while KRG trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 323.57. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check KRG's competition here
BFS vs MAC Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while MAC trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -36.08. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check MAC's competition here
BFS vs PECO Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while PECO trades at $34.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 59.59. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check PECO's competition here
BFS vs REGCP Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while REGCP trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check REGCP's competition here
BFS vs REGCO Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while REGCO trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check REGCO's competition here
BFS vs SKT Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while SKT trades at $31.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SKT's competition here
BFS vs FCPT Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while FCPT trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check FCPT's competition here
BFS vs AKR Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while AKR trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 110.38. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check AKR's competition here
BFS vs CURB Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while CURB trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 190.67. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check CURB's competition here
BFS vs ROIC Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check ROIC's competition here
BFS vs IVT Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while IVT trades at $27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 114.83. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check IVT's competition here
BFS vs ADC-PA Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while ADC-PA trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check ADC-PA's competition here
BFS vs GTY Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while GTY trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check GTY's competition here
BFS vs NTST Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while NTST trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is -229.62. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check NTST's competition here
BFS vs ALX Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while ALX trades at $258.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check ALX's competition here
BFS vs RPT-PD Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check RPT-PD's competition here
BFS vs CBL Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 846.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while CBL trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check CBL's competition here
BFS vs UBP Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check UBP's competition here
BFS vs UBA Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check UBA's competition here
BFS vs UBP-PK Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check UBP-PK's competition here
BFS vs BFS-PD Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 811.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while BFS-PD trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check BFS-PD's competition here
BFS vs UBP-PH Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check UBP-PH's competition here
BFS vs WSR Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 641M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while WSR trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WSR's competition here
BFS vs SITC Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 578.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while SITC trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SITC's competition here
BFS vs BFS-PE Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 542.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while BFS-PE trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check BFS-PE's competition here
BFS vs SITC-PA Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SITC-PA's competition here
BFS vs CDR-PB Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 236M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while CDR-PB trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check CDR-PB's competition here
BFS vs CDR-PC Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 214M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while CDR-PC trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check CDR-PC's competition here
BFS vs PINE Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 204.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while PINE trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is 179.00. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PINE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check PINE's competition here
BFS vs SRG Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 185.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while SRG trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SRG's competition here
BFS vs SRG-PA Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 184.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while SRG-PA trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check SRG-PA's competition here
BFS vs WHLRD Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while WHLRD trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -18.62. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WHLRD's competition here
BFS vs WHLRP Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while WHLRP trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WHLRP's competition here
BFS vs WHLRL Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while WHLRL trades at $148.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -79.60. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WHLRL's competition here
BFS vs WHLR Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while WHLR trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WHLR's competition here
BFS vs PEI-PD Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check PEI-PD's competition here
BFS vs BPYU Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check BPYU's competition here
BFS vs BPYUP Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check BPYUP's competition here
BFS vs RVI Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while RVI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check RVI's competition here
BFS vs WRI Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WRI's competition here
BFS vs HMG Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check HMG's competition here
BFS vs WPG Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check WPG's competition here
BFS vs NNN-PF Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check NNN-PF's competition here
BFS vs PEI Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check PEI's competition here
BFS vs PEI-PC Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check PEI-PC's competition here
BFS vs PEI-PB Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check PEI-PB's competition here
BFS vs CDR Comparison July 2025
BFS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS stands at 801.8M. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS is priced at $33.11, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, BFS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS.Check CDR's competition here