Saul Centers, Inc.
Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS-PD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BFS-PD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFS-PD | $20.65 | +0.34% | 777.2M | 12.41 | $1.69 | +7.22% |
| SPG | $180.19 | -0.89% | 58.5B | 12.71 | $14.17 | +4.79% |
| O | $60.69 | +0.70% | 56.6B | 51.85 | $1.17 | +5.32% |
| SPG-PJ | $52.49 | -1.70% | 54B | 7.72 | $6.78 | +4.79% |
| KIM-PN | $59.43 | -0.15% | 40.1B | N/A | N/A | +4.58% |
| KIM | $22.22 | -0.18% | 15B | 27.08 | $0.82 | +4.58% |
| REG | $74.30 | -0.09% | 13.6B | 26.35 | $2.82 | +3.92% |
| KIM-PM | $20.06 | -0.20% | 13.5B | 12.19 | $1.65 | +4.58% |
| KIM-PL | $19.48 | +0.00% | 13.2B | 11.83 | $1.65 | +4.58% |
| ADC | $74.41 | +0.01% | 8.9B | 42.05 | $1.77 | +4.16% |
Stock Comparison
BFS-PD vs SPG Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while SPG trades at $180.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check SPG's competition here
BFS-PD vs O Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, O has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while O trades at $60.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas O's P/E ratio is 51.85. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check O's competition here
BFS-PD vs SPG-PJ Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while SPG-PJ trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
BFS-PD vs KIM-PN Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while KIM-PN trades at $59.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check KIM-PN's competition here
BFS-PD vs KIM Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while KIM trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check KIM's competition here
BFS-PD vs REG Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while REG trades at $74.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check REG's competition here
BFS-PD vs KIM-PM Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while KIM-PM trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check KIM-PM's competition here
BFS-PD vs KIM-PL Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while KIM-PL trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check KIM-PL's competition here
BFS-PD vs ADC Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while ADC trades at $74.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 42.05. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check ADC's competition here
BFS-PD vs FRT Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while FRT trades at $102.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check FRT's competition here
BFS-PD vs BRX Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while BRX trades at $28.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check BRX's competition here
BFS-PD vs NNN Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while NNN trades at $41.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check NNN's competition here
BFS-PD vs FRT-PC Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while FRT-PC trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check FRT-PC's competition here
BFS-PD vs KRG Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while KRG trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check KRG's competition here
BFS-PD vs MAC Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while MAC trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -23.22. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check MAC's competition here
BFS-PD vs PECO Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while PECO trades at $36.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 41.36. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check PECO's competition here
BFS-PD vs REGCP Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while REGCP trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check REGCP's competition here
BFS-PD vs REGCO Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while REGCO trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check REGCO's competition here
BFS-PD vs SKT Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while SKT trades at $33.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check SKT's competition here
BFS-PD vs CURB Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while CURB trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 69.22. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check CURB's competition here
BFS-PD vs FCPT Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while FCPT trades at $23.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check FCPT's competition here
BFS-PD vs AKR Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while AKR trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 187.70. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check AKR's competition here
BFS-PD vs IVT Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while IVT trades at $30.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check IVT's competition here
BFS-PD vs ROIC Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check ROIC's competition here
BFS-PD vs GTY Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while GTY trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check GTY's competition here
BFS-PD vs ADC-PA Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while ADC-PA trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check ADC-PA's competition here
BFS-PD vs NTST Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while NTST trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 233.38. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check NTST's competition here
BFS-PD vs ALEX Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while ALEX trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check ALEX's competition here
BFS-PD vs ALX Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while ALX trades at $236.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 42.91. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check ALX's competition here
BFS-PD vs CBL Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while CBL trades at $37.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check CBL's competition here
BFS-PD vs RPT-PD Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check RPT-PD's competition here
BFS-PD vs UBP Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check UBP's competition here
BFS-PD vs UBA Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check UBA's competition here
BFS-PD vs WSR Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 821.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while WSR trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check WSR's competition here
BFS-PD vs UBP-PK Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check UBP-PK's competition here
BFS-PD vs BFS Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 793.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while BFS trades at $32.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check BFS's competition here
BFS-PD vs UBP-PH Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check UBP-PH's competition here
BFS-PD vs BFS-PE Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 524.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while BFS-PE trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check BFS-PE's competition here
BFS-PD vs SITC-PA Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check SITC-PA's competition here
BFS-PD vs SITC Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 275.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while SITC trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check SITC's competition here
BFS-PD vs PINE Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 270.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while PINE trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -81.50. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PINE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check PINE's competition here
BFS-PD vs CDR-PB Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 270.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while CDR-PB trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check CDR-PB's competition here
BFS-PD vs CDR-PC Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 266M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while CDR-PC trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check CDR-PC's competition here
BFS-PD vs SRG-PA Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 173M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while SRG-PA trades at $24.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check SRG-PA's competition here
BFS-PD vs SRG Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 151.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while SRG trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check SRG's competition here
BFS-PD vs WHLRL Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while WHLRL trades at $80.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -42.83. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check WHLRL's competition here
BFS-PD vs WHLRP Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while WHLRP trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check WHLRP's competition here
BFS-PD vs WHLRD Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while WHLRD trades at $37.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -19.91. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check WHLRD's competition here
BFS-PD vs WHLR Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 210.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while WHLR trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check WHLR's competition here
BFS-PD vs HMG Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check HMG's competition here
BFS-PD vs PEI-PC Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check PEI-PC's competition here
BFS-PD vs NNN-PF Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check NNN-PF's competition here
BFS-PD vs CDR Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check CDR's competition here
BFS-PD vs BPYU Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check BPYU's competition here
BFS-PD vs PEI-PB Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check PEI-PB's competition here
BFS-PD vs BPYUP Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check BPYUP's competition here
BFS-PD vs RVI Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while RVI trades at $28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -33.86. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check RVI's competition here
BFS-PD vs EQY Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, EQY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while EQY trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas EQY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to EQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check EQY's competition here
BFS-PD vs WRI Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check WRI's competition here
BFS-PD vs PEI-PD Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check PEI-PD's competition here
BFS-PD vs WPG Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check WPG's competition here
BFS-PD vs PEI Comparison April 2026
BFS-PD plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BFS-PD stands at 777.2M. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFS-PD is priced at $20.65, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BFS-PD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BFS-PD's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFS-PD is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFS-PD.Check PEI's competition here