Birchtech Corp.
Birchtech Corp. (BCHT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BCHT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCHT | $2.13 | +1.43% | 56M | -10.90 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| VLTO | $91.21 | +1.12% | 22.7B | 24.27 | $3.76 | +0.50% |
| ZWS | $45.19 | -1.18% | 7.6B | 40.36 | $1.12 | +0.88% |
| FSS | $106.93 | +1.43% | 6.5B | 26.66 | $4.01 | +0.53% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $57.26 | +1.22% | 4.7B | 22.89 | $2.50 | +0.38% |
| CECO | $57.06 | +4.70% | 2B | 41.65 | $1.37 | N/A |
| PCT | $5.81 | +0.87% | 1B | -4.80 | -$1.21 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $6.12 | -1.29% | 840.2M | -9.82 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ERII | $10.26 | +2.09% | 543.5M | 24.43 | $0.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BCHT vs VLTO Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while VLTO trades at $91.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check VLTO's competition here
BCHT vs ZWS Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while ZWS trades at $45.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 40.36. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check ZWS's competition here
BCHT vs FSS Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while FSS trades at $106.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check FSS's competition here
BCHT vs AQUA Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check AQUA's competition here
BCHT vs ATMU Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while ATMU trades at $57.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check ATMU's competition here
BCHT vs CECO Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while CECO trades at $57.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 41.65. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check CECO's competition here
BCHT vs PCT Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while PCT trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to PCT's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check PCT's competition here
BCHT vs PCTTU Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 840.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while PCTTU trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check PCTTU's competition here
BCHT vs ERII Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 543.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while ERII trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check ERII's competition here
BCHT vs CECE Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check CECE's competition here
BCHT vs ADES Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to ADES's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check ADES's competition here
BCHT vs PCTTW Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while PCTTW trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check PCTTW's competition here
BCHT vs ARQ Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while ARQ trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -20.89. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check ARQ's competition here
BCHT vs ZONE Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while ZONE trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -17.37. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check ZONE's competition here
BCHT vs FTEK Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while FTEK trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check FTEK's competition here
BCHT vs SCWO Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while SCWO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check SCWO's competition here
BCHT vs BHTG Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check BHTG's competition here
BCHT vs CLIR Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while CLIR trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check CLIR's competition here
BCHT vs LIQT Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while LIQT trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check LIQT's competition here
BCHT vs TOMZ Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while TOMZ trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check TOMZ's competition here
BCHT vs CLWT Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while CLWT trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is more volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check CLWT's competition here
BCHT vs DEVS Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while DEVS trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check DEVS's competition here
BCHT vs MKUL Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check MKUL's competition here
BCHT vs RAINW Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while RAINW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check RAINW's competition here
BCHT vs SPECW Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check SPECW's competition here
BCHT vs SPEC Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 3.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is more volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check SPEC's competition here
BCHT vs NEWA Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check NEWA's competition here
BCHT vs AERC Comparison March 2026
BCHT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCHT stands at 56M. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BCHT is priced at $2.13, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCHT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.90, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCHT's ROE is +6.96%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BCHT is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCHT.Check AERC's competition here